Sun-to-Mud observations of the May and October storms of 2024: impacts on Ireland’s Space Weather | Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate

Topical Issue - Severe space weather events of May 2024 and their impacts

Open Access

Issue		J. Space Weather Space Clim. Volume 16, 2026 Topical Issue - Severe space weather events of May 2024 and their impacts


Article Number		2
Number of page(s)		22
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2025044
Published online		15 January 2026

Aa, E, Zhang S-R, Lei J, Huang F, Erickson PJ, Coster AJ, Luo B, Kerr RB. 2024. Significant midlatitude plasma density peaks and dual-hemisphere SED during the 10–11 May 2024 Super Geomagnetic Storm. J Geophys Res Space Phys 129 (11): e2024JA033360. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033360. [Google Scholar]
Ambili, KM, Choudhary RK, Ashok A, Potdar A, Vineeth C, Pant TK. 2025. The impact of 11 May 2024 great geomagnetic storm on the plasma distribution over the indian equatorial/low latitude ionospheric region. J Geophys Res Space Phys 130 (4): e2024JA033368. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033368. [Google Scholar]
Ang, DJ, Buhari SM, Abdullah M, Bahari SA. 2025. The effects of solar flares and geomagnetic storm on the upper and lower ionosphere across the Malay archipelago between 8th and 15th May 2024. J Geophys Res Space Phys 130 (4): e2024JA033601. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033601. [Google Scholar]
Araki, T. 1994. A physical model of the geomagnetic sudden commencement. Geophys Monogr 81: 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1029/GM081p0183. [Google Scholar]
Astafyeva, E, Maletckii B, Förster M, Ouar ID, Huba JD, Hairston MR, Coley WR. 2025. Electrodynamic and Ionospheric Puzzles of the 10–11 May 2024 geomagnetic superstorm. J Geophys Res Space Phys 130 (5): e2024JA033284. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033284. [Google Scholar]
Baruah, Y, Roy S, Sinha S, Palmerio E, Pal S, Oliveira DM, Nandy D. 2024. The loss of Starlink satellites in February 2022: How moderate geomagnetic storms can adversely affect assets in low-earth orbit. Space Weather 22 (4): e2023SW003716. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003716. [Google Scholar]
Bergin, A, Chapman SC, Gjerloev JW. 2020. AE, Dst, and their SuperMAG counterparts: The effect of improved spatial resolution in geomagnetic indices. J Geophys Res Space Phys 125: e2020JA027828. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA027828. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Billings, SA. 2013. Nonlinear system identification: NARMAX methods in the time, frequency, and spatio-temporal domains. Wiley. ISBN 9781118535561. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118535561. [Google Scholar]
Blake, SP, Gallagher PT, Campanyà J, Hogg C, Beggan C, Thomson AWP, Richardson GS, Bell D. 2018. A detailed model of the Irish high voltage power network for simulating GICs. Space Weather 16: 1770–1783. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001926. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Blake, SP, Gallagher PT, McCauley J, Jones AG, Hogg C, Campanya J, Beggan C, Thomson AWP, Kelly GS, Bell D. 2016. Geomagnetically induced currents in the Irish power network during geomagnetic storms. Space Weather 14: 1136–1154. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016SW001534. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bolduc, L. 2002. GIC observations and studies in the Hydro-Québec power system. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 64: 1793–1802. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00128-1. [Google Scholar]
Boynton, R, Balikhin H-L, Wei M, Lang Z-Q. 2018. Chapter 8 – Applications of NARMAX in Space Weather. In: Machine Learning Techniques for Space Weather, E, Camporeale, Wing S, Johnson JR (Eds.), Elsevier, pp. 203–236. ISBN 978-0-12-811788-0. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811788-0.00008-1. [Google Scholar]
Boynton, RJ, Balikhin MA, Billings SA, Sharma AS, Amariutei OA. 2011. Data derived NARMAX Dst model. Ann Geophys 29 (6): 965–971. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-965-2011. [Google Scholar]
Brueckner, GE, Howard RA, Koomen MJ, Korendyke CM, Michels DJ, et al. 1995. The Large Angle Spectroscopic Coronagraph (LASCO). Solar Phys 162 (1–2): 357–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733434. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Campanyà, J, Gallagher PT, Blake SP, Gibbs M, Jackson D, Beggan CD, Richardson GS, Hogg C. 2019. Modeling geoelectric fields in Ireland and the UK for space weather. Space Weather 17: 216–237. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001999. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Carmo, CS, Dai L, Wrasse CM, Barros D, Takahashi H, Figueiredo CAOB, Wang C, Li H, Liu Z. 2024. Ionospheric response to the extreme 2024 Mother’s Day geomagnetic storm over the Latin American sector. Space Weather 22 (12): e2024SW004054. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW004054. [Google Scholar]
Coco, I, Amata E, Marcucci MF, Ambrosino D, Shepherd SG. 2011. Effects of abrupt variations of solar wind dynamic pressure on the high-latitude ionosphere. Int J Geophys 2011: 207514. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/207514. [Google Scholar]
Coco, I, Amata E, Marcucci MF, Ambrosino D, Villain JP, Hanuise C. 2008. The effects of an interplanetary shock on the high-latitude ionospheric convection during an IMF By-dominated period. Ann Geophys 26 (9): 2937–2951. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-26-2937-2008. [Google Scholar]
Coco, I, Amata E, Marcucci MF, De Laurentis M, Villain JP, Hanuise C, Candidi M. 2005. Effects on SuperDARN HF radar echoes on sudden impulses of solar wind dynamic pressure. Ann Geophys 23 (5): 1771–1783. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-1771-2005. [Google Scholar]
Cowley, SWH, Lockwood M. 1992. Excitation and decay of solar wind-driven flows in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system. Ann Geophys 10 (1–2): 103–115. [Google Scholar]
De Michelis, P, Consolini G. 2025. Unveiling the Gannon storm: How ground-based magnetometers mapped its global impact. Space Weather 23 (6): e2025SW004350. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025SW004350. [Google Scholar]
Domingo, V, Fleck B, Poland AI. 1995. The SOHO mission: An overview. Sol Phys 162 (1–2): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Elvidge, S. 2025. Space weather can affect our daily lives – we need a better warning system. Nature 630: 271. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01715-z. [Google Scholar]
Elvidge, S, Themens DR. 2025. The probability of the May 2024 geomagnetic superstorm. Space Weather 23 (1): e2024SW004113. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW004113. [Google Scholar]
Evans, JS, Correira J, Lumpe JD, Eastes RW, Gan Q, et al.. 2024. GOLD observations of the thermospheric response to the 10–12 May 2024 Gannon superstorm. Geophys Res Lett 51: e2024GL110506. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110506 [Google Scholar]
Fang, T-W, Kubaryk A, Goldstein D, Li Z, Fuller-Rowell T, Millward G, Singer HJ, Steenburgh R, Westerman S, Babcock E. 2022. Space weather environment during the SpaceX Starlink satellite loss in February 2022. Space Weather 20: e2022SW003193. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003193. [Google Scholar]
Fogg, AR, Healy D, Jackman CM, Parnell AC, Rutala MJ, McEntee SC, Walker SJ, Gallagher PT, Bowers CF. 2025. Bivariate extreme value analysis for space weather risk assessment: Solar wind – magnetosphere driving in the terrestrial system. Space Weather 23 (5): e2024SW004176. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW004176. [Google Scholar]
Fogg, AR, Jackman CM, Coco I, Douglas Rooney L, Weigt DM, Lester M. 2023a. Why are some solar wind pressure pulses followed by geomagnetic storms? J Geophys Res Space Phys 128, e2022JA031259. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA031259. [Google Scholar]
Fogg, AR, Jackman CM, Malone-Leigh J, Gallagher PT, Smith AW, Lester M, Walach MT, Waters JE. 2023b. Extreme value analysis of ground magnetometer observations at Valentia observatory, Ireland. Space Weather 21: e2023SW003565. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003565. [Google Scholar]
Fogg, AR, Lester M, Yeoman TK, Carter JA, Milan SE, et al. 2023c. Multi-instrument observations of the effects of a solar wind pressure pulse on the high latitude ionosphere: A detailed case study of a geomagnetic sudden impulse. J Geophys Res Space Phys 128: e2022JA031136. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA031136. [Google Scholar]
Fu, WD, Fu HS, Zhang WZ, Yu Y, Cao JB. 2025. Compression of Earth’s magnetopause down to 5 RE during the superstorm on 10 May 2024. Geophys Res Lett 52 (5): e2024GL114040. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL114040. [Google Scholar]
Grandin, M, Bruus E, Ledvina VE, Partamies N, Barthelemy M, et al. 2024. The Gannon storm: Citizen science observations during the geomagnetic superstorm of 10 May 2024. Geosci Commun 7 (4): 297–316. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-297-2024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Greshko, M. 2024. Extreme solar storm generated aurorae–and “surprise” [Science Insider, Accessed on 22/04/2025], https://doi.org/10.1126/science.zoakd5z. https://www.science.org/content/article/extreme-solar-storm-generated-auroras-and-surprise. [Google Scholar]
Griffin T, Knipp D, Janelle SMulligan Skov T, McIntosh S, Leamon R. 2025. Impact of the Gannon Storm on corn production across the Midwestern USA [Zenodo]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14976490. [Google Scholar]
Groenewegen GLM, van Rooij ACM. 2016. The Stone-Weierstrass theorem. ISBN 978-94-6239-201-4. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-201-4_3. [Google Scholar]
Guo, X, Zhao B, Yu T, Hao H, Sun W, Wang G, He M, Mao T, Li G, Ren Z. 2024. East–West difference in the ionospheric response during the recovery phase of May 2024 super geomagnetic storm over the East Asian. J Geophys Res Space Phys 129 (9): e2024JA033170. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033170. [Google Scholar]
Hale, GE, Ellerman F, Nicholson SB, Joy AH. 1919. The magnetic polarity of sun-spots. Astrophys J 49: 153. https://doi.org/10.1086/142452. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hapgood, M, Liu H, Lugaz N. 2022. SpaceX–sailing close to the space weather? Space Weather 20 (3): e2022SW003074. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003074. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hayakawa, H, Ebihara Y, Mishev A, Koldobskiy S, Kusano K, et al. 2025. The solar and geomagnetic storms in 2024 May: A flash data report. Astrophys J 979 (1): 49. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9335. [Google Scholar]
Herlingshaw K, Lach D, Dayton-Oxland R, Bruus E, Karvinen E, et al. 2024. ARCTICS Aurora field guide and handbook for citizen science. [Zenodo]. 10.5281/zenodo.13932081. [Google Scholar]
Hori, T, Shinbori A, Fujita S, Nishitani N. 2015. IMF-By dependence of transient ionospheric flow perturbation associated with sudden impulses: SuperDARN observations. Earth Planets Space 67: 190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0360-6. [Google Scholar]
Huang, F, Lei J, Zhang S-R, Wang Y, Li Z, Zhong J, Yan R, Aa E, Zhima Z, Luan X. 2024. Peculiar nighttime ionospheric enhancements over the Asian sector during the May 2024 superstorm. J Geophys Res Space Phys 129 (11): https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033350. [Google Scholar]
Iyemori, T. 1990. Storm-time magnetospheric currents inferred from mid-latitude geomagnetic field variations. J Geomag Geoelectr 42 (11): 1249–1265. https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.42.1249. [Google Scholar]
Jin, Y, Kotova D, Clausen LBN, Miloch WJ. 2025. Significant plasma density depletion from high- to mid-latitude ionosphere during the super storm in May 2024. Geophys Res Lett 52 (5): e2024GL113997. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL113997. [Google Scholar]
Jun, C-W, Miyoshi Y, Hori T, Kitamura N, Kim K-H, et al. 2025. Arase in situ observations of high-frequency electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves in regions close to the earth during the May 2024 storm. Geophys Res Lett 52 (7): e2024GL112489. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL112489. [Google Scholar]
Karan, DK, Martinis CR, Daniell RE, Eastes RW, Wang W, McClintock WE, Michell RG, England S. 2024. GOLD observations of the merging of the southern crest of the equatorial ionization anomaly and aurora during the 10 and 11 May 2024 Mother’s Day super geomagnetic storm. Geophys Res Lett 51 (15): e2024GL110632. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110632. [Google Scholar]
Kataoka, R, Nakano S, Uchino S, Reddy SA. 2025. Extended red aurora associated with super substorm igniting the October 10, 2024 magnetic storm as revealed by citizen science. Earth, Planets Space 77: 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-025-02178-w. [Google Scholar]
Kataoka, R, Reddy SA, Nakano S, Pettit J, Nakamura Y. 2024. Extended magenta aurora as revealed by citizen science. Nat Sci Rep 14: 25849. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75184-9. [Google Scholar]
Khuntia, S, Mishra W, Agarwal A. 2025. Evolution of the interacting coronal mass ejections that drove the great geomagnetic storm of 10 May 2024. Astron Astrophys 698: A79. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452866. [Google Scholar]
King, JH, Papitashvili NE. 2005. Solar wind spatial scales in and comparisons of hourly Wind and ACE plasma and magnetic field data. J Geophys Res Space Phys 110: A2. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010649. [Google Scholar]
Kruparova, O, Krupar V, Szabo A, Lario D, Nieves-Chinchilla T, Martinez Oliveros JC. 2024. Unveiling the interplanetary solar radio bursts of the 2024 Mother’s Day solar storm. Astrophys J Lett 970 (1), L13. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad5da6. [Google Scholar]
Kwak, Y-S, Kim J-H, Kim S, Miyashita Y, Yang T, et al. 2024. Observational overview of the May 2024 G5-level geomagnetic storm: From solar eruptions to terrestrial consequences. J Astron Space Sci 41 (3): 171–194. https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2024.41.3.171. [Google Scholar]
Lazzús, JA, Salfate I. 2024. Report on the effects of the May 2024 Mother’s day geomagnetic storm observed from Chile. J Atmos Sol-Terr Physics 261: 106304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106304. [Google Scholar]
Lazzús, JA, Vega-Jorquera P, Palma-Chilla L, Stepanova MV, Romanova NV. 2019. Dst index forecast based on ground-level data aided by bio-inspired algorithms. Space Weather 17 (10): 1487–1506. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002215. [Google Scholar]
Lockwood M, Cowley SWH. 1992. Ionospheric convection and the substorm cycle. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Substorms (ICS-1), 23–27 March 1992, Kiruna, Sweden, pp. 99–109. [Google Scholar]
Ludwig, G, Johnson D. 1981. Geostationary operational environmental satellite system performance. Adv Space Res 1 (4): 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(81)90047-8. [Google Scholar]
Malone-Leigh J. 2024. Monitoring and modelling geomagnetic and geoelectric fields in Ireland, Ph.D. Thesis, Trinity College Dublin. http://hdl.handle.net/2262/108568. [Google Scholar]
Malone-Leigh, J, Campanyà J, Gallagher PT, Hodgson J, Hogg C. 2024. Mapping geoelectric field hazards in Ireland. Space Weather 22 (2): e2023SW003638. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003638. [Google Scholar]
Malone-Leigh, J, Campanyà J, Gallagher PT, Neukirch M, Hogg C, Hoggson J. 2023. Nowcasting geoelectric fields in Ireland using magnetotelluric transfer functions. J Space Weather Space Clim 13: 6. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2023004. [Google Scholar]
Matzka J, Bronkalla O, da Silva MV, Kervalishvili G, Rauberg J, Korte M, Yamazaki Y. 2024. Geomagnetic Hpo index (V3.0). [Dataset, v3.0]. https://doi.org/10.5880/Hpo.0003. [Google Scholar]
Matzka, J, Stolle C, Yamazaki Y, Bronkalla O, Morschhauser A. 2021. The geomagnetic Kp index and derived indices of geomagnetic activity. Space Weather 19: e2020SW002641. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002641. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mavromichalaki, H, Papailiou M-C, Livada M, Gerontidou M, Paschalis P, et al. 2024. Unusual forbush decreases and geomagnetic storms on 24 March, 2024 and 11 May, 2024. Atmosphere 15 (9): 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15091033. [Google Scholar]
McIntosh, PS. 1990. The classification of sunspot groups. Sol Phys 125: 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Milan, SE, Gosling JS, Hubert B. 2012. Relationship between interplanetary parameters and the magnetopause reconnection rate quantified from observations of the expanding polar cap. J Geophys Res 117: A03226. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017082. [Google Scholar]
Milan, SE, Lester M, Cowley SWH, Oksavik K, Brittnacher M, Greenwald RA, Sofko G, Villain JP. 2003. Variations in the polar cap area during two substorm cycles. Ann Geophys 21 (5): 1121–1140. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-21-1121-2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Milan, SE, Provan G, Hubert B. 2007. Magnetic flux transport in the Dungey cycle: A survey of dayside and nightside reconnection rates. J Geophys Res Space Phys 112: A1. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011642. [Google Scholar]
Mlynczak, MG, Hunt LA, Nowak N, Marshall BT, Mertens CJ. 2024. Global thermospheric infrared response to the Mother’s Day weekend extreme storm of 2024. Geophys Res Lett 51 (15): e2024GL110701. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110701. [Google Scholar]
Nanjo, S, Shiokawa K. 2024. Spatial structures of blue low-latitude aurora observed from Japan during the extreme geomagnetic storm of May 2024. Earth Planets Space 76: 156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-024-02090-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Nayak, C, Buchert S, Yiğit E, Ankita M, Singh S, Tulasi Ram S, Dimri AP. 2025. Topside low-latitude ionospheric response to the 10–11 May 2024 super geomagnetic storm as observed by swarm: The strongest storm-time super-fountain during the swarm era? J Geophys Res Space Phys 130 (3): e2024JA033340. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033340. [Google Scholar]
Newell, PT, Gjerloev JW. 2011. Evaluation of SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices as indicators of substorms and auroral power. J Geophys Res Space Phys 116: A12211. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016779. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Newell, PT, Gjerloev JW. 2012. SuperMAG-based partial ring current indices. J Geophys Res Space Phys 117: A05215. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017586. [Google Scholar]
NOAA-SWPC. 2024a. Severe and extreme (G4–G5) geomagnetic storms likely on 12 May 2024. [NOAA SWPC, Accessed on 22/04/2025]. https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/news/severe-and-extreme-g4-g5-geomagnetic-storms-likely-12-may-2024. [Google Scholar]
NOAA-SWPC. 2024b. SWPC issues its first G4 watch since 2005. [NOAA SWPC, Accessed on 22/04/2025]. https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/news/swpc-issues-its-first-g4-watch-2005. [Google Scholar]
Ohtani, S, Zou Y, Merkin VG, Wiltberger M, Pham KH, Raptis S, Friel M, Gjerloev JW. 2025. Ground magnetic response to an extraordinary IMF by flip during the May 2024 storm: Travel time from the magnetosheath to dayside high latitudes. J Geophys Res Space Phys 130 (5), e2024JA033691. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033691. [Google Scholar]
Olifer, L, Manavalan P, Headrick D, Palmers S, Harbarenko B, Cai J, Fourie J, Bauer O, Mann IR. 2025. Low-cost monitoring of energetic particle precipitation: Weather Balloon–Borne timepix measurements during the May 2024 superstorm. J Geophys Res Space Phys 130 (4): e2024JA033626. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033626. [Google Scholar]
Oliveira, DM, Zesta E, Nandy D. 2025. The 10 October 2024 geomagnetic storm may have caused the premature reentry of a Starlink satellite. Front Astron Space Sci 11: 2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2024.1522139. [Google Scholar]
Papitashvili, N. 2023. OMNIWeb Plus. [Dataset]. https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/hw.html. [Google Scholar]
Papitashvili, NE, King JH. 2020. OMNI Hourly Data. [Dataset], Accessed on 13/02/2024. https://doi.org/10.48322/1shr-ht18 [Google Scholar]
Parker, WE, and Linares R. 2024. Satellite drag analysis during the May 2024 Gannon geomagnetic storm. J Spacecr Rockets 61 (5): 1412–1416. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A36164. [Google Scholar]
Parkinson, WD, Jones FW. 1979. The geomagnetic coast effect. Rev Geophys 17 (8): 1999–2015. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG017i008p01999. [Google Scholar]
Patterson, CJ, Wild JA, Beggan CD, Richardson GS, Boteler DH. 2024. Modelling electrified railway signalling misoperations during extreme space weather events in the UK. Nat Sci Rep 14: 1583. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51390-3. [Google Scholar]
Paul, KS, Haralambous H, Moses M, Tripathi SC. 2025. Effects of the October 2024 storm over the global ionosphere. Remote Sens 17 (13): 2329. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17132329. [Google Scholar]
Pesnell, WD, Thompson BJ, Chamberlin PC. 2012. The solar dynamics observatory (SDO). Sol Phys 275 (1–2): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9841-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pierrard, V, Verhulst TGW, Chevalier J-M, Bergeot N, Winant A. 2025. Effects of the geomagnetic superstorms of 10–11 May 2024 and 7–11 October 2024 on the ionosphere and plasmasphere. Atmosphere 16 (3): 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16030299. [Google Scholar]
Ranjan, AK, Nailwal D, Sunil Krishna MV, Kumar A, Sarkhel S. 2024. Evidence of potential thermospheric overcooling during the May 2024 geomagnetic superstorm. J Geophys Res Space Phys 129 (12): e2024JA033148. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033148. [Google Scholar]
Rout, D, Kumar A, Singh R, Patra S, Karan DK, Chakraborty S, Scipion D, Chakrabarty D, Riccobono J. 2025. Evidence of unusually strong equatorial ionization anomaly at three local time sectors during the Mother’s Day geomagnetic storm on 10–11 May 2024. Geophys Res Lett 52 (2): e2024GL111269. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL111269. [Google Scholar]
Scherrer, PH, Schou J, Bush RI, Kosovichev AG, Bogart RS, et al. 2012. The helioseismic and magnetic imager (HMI) investigation for the solar dynamics observatory (SDO). Sol Phys 275 (1–2): 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9834-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Shue, JH, Song P. 2002. The location and shape of the magnetopause. Planet Space Sci 50 (5): 549–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(02)00034-X. [Google Scholar]
Siegel AF. 2012. Chapter 12 – multiple regression: Predicting one variable from several others. In Practical Business Statistics (6th edn)Academic Press, pp. 347–416. ISBN 978-0-12-385208-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385208-3.00012-2. [Google Scholar]
Sierra-Porta, D, Petro-Ramos JD, Ruiz-Morales DJ, Herrera-Acevedo D, García-Teheran A, Tarazona Alvarado M. 2024. Machine learning models for predicting geomagnetic storms across five solar cycles using Dst index and heliospheric variables. Adv Space Res 74 (8): 3483–3495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.08.031. [Google Scholar]
Singh, R, Scipión DE, Kuyeng K, Condor P, De La Jara C, Velasquez JP, Flores R, Ivan E, Souza JR, Migliozzi M. 2024. Ionospheric disturbances observed over the Peruvian sector during the Mother’s Day storm (G5-Level). J Geophys Res Space Phys 129 (11): e2024JA033003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033003. [Google Scholar]
Song, Q, Ye Q, Zhang X, Mao T. 2025. Thermospheric disturbance observed by triple ionosphere photometer onboard the Chinese meteorological satellite FY3E during 10–11 May 2024 storm. J Geophys Res Space Phys 130 (5): e2024JA033386. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033386. [Google Scholar]
Spogli, L, Alberti T, Bagiacchi P, Cafarella L, Cesaroni C, et al. 2024. The effects of the May 2024 Mother’s Day superstorm over the Mediterranean sector: From data to public communication. Ann Geophys 67 (2): PA218. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-9117. [Google Scholar]
St-Louis B, Intermagnet Executive Council and Intermagnet Operations Committee. 2024. INTERMAGNET Technical Reference Manual, Version 5.1. 1. GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.48440/INTERMAGNET.2024.001. https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/rest/items/item_5029649_1/component/file_5029650/content. [Google Scholar]
Sun, W, Li G, Zhang S-R, Zhao B, Li Y, et al. 2024. Complex ionospheric fluctuations over East and Southeast Asia during the May 2024 super geomagnetic storm. J Geophys Res Space Phys 129 (12): e2024JA033096. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033096. [Google Scholar]
Sun, W, Li G, Zhao B, Zhang S-R, Otsuka Y, et al. 2024. Midlatitude plasma blob-like structures along with super equatorial plasma bubbles during the May 2024 great geomagnetic storm. Geophys Res Lett 51 (21): e2024GL111638. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL111638. [Google Scholar]
Taylor, JR, Lester M, Yeoman TK. 1994. A superposed epoch analysis of geomagnetic storms. Ann Geophys 12 (7): 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-994-0612-4. [Google Scholar]
Temerin, M, Li X. 2002. A new model for the prediction of Dst on the basis of the solar wind. J Geophys Res Space Phys 107: A12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA007532. [Google Scholar]
Temerin, M, Li X. 2006. Dst model for 1995–2002. J Geophys Res Space Phys 111: A4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011257. [Google Scholar]
Themens, DR, Elvidge S, McCaffrey A, Jayachandran PT, Coster A, et al. 2024. The high latitude ionospheric response to the major May 2024 geomagnetic storm: A synoptic view. Geophys Res Lett 51 (19): e2024GL111677. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL111677. [Google Scholar]
Toriumi, S, Wang H. 2019. Flare-productive active regions. Living Rev Sol Phys 16 (3): 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-019-0019-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Tulasi Ram, S, Veenadhari B, Dimri AP, Bulusu J, Bagiya M, et al. 2024. Super-intense geomagnetic storm on 10–11 May 2024: Possible mechanisms and impacts. Space Weather 22 (12): e2024SW004126. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW004126. [Google Scholar]
Vichare, G, Bagiya MS. 2024. Manifestations of strong IMF-By on the equatorial ionospheric electrodynamics during 10 May 2024 geomagnetic storm. Geophys Res Lett 51 (23): e2024GL112569. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL112569. [Google Scholar]
Wan, Q, Ma G, Zhou G, Li J, Fan J. 2025. The ionospheric response during the super geomagnetic storm on May 10–11, 2024. J Geophys Res Space Phys 130 (4): e2024JA033627. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033627. [Google Scholar]
Wang, X, Aa E, Chen Y, Zhang J, Zhu Y, et al. 2025. Midlatitude neutral wind response during the Mother’s Day super-intense geomagnetic storm in 2024 using observations from the Chinese Meridian project. J Geophys Res Space Phys 130 (4): e2024JA033574. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033574. [Google Scholar]
Weimer, DR, King JH. 2008. Improved calculations of interplanetary magnetic field phase front angles and propagation time delays. J Geophys Res Space Phys 113 (A1): A01105. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012452. [Google Scholar]
Weimer, DR, Ober DM, Maynard NC, Burke WJ, Collier MR, McComas DJ, Ness NF, Smith CW. 2002. Variable time delays in the propagation of the interplanetary magnetic field. J Geophys Res Space Phys 107: A8. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA009102. [Google Scholar]
Weimer, DR, Ober DM, Maynard NC, Collier MR, McComas DJ, Ness NF, Smith CW, Watermann J. 2003. Predicting interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) propagation delay times using the minimum variance technique. J Geophys Res Space Phys 108: A1. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009405. [Google Scholar]
Witze, A. 2024. Dazzling auroras are just a warm-up as more solar storms are likely, scientists say. Nature 629: 736–737. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01432-7. [Google Scholar]
Xia, H, Wang H, Zhang K. 2024. Extreme responses of the ionospheric radial currents to the main phase of the super geomagnetic storm on 10 May 2024. J Geophys Res Space Phys 129 (12): e2024JA033126. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033126. [Google Scholar]
Xia, X, Hu X, Wang H, Zhang K. 2025. Correlation study of auroral currents with external parameters during 10–12 October 2024 superstorm. Remote Sens 17 (3): 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17030394. [Google Scholar]
Xu, X, Ma Y, Zhang L, Yu T, Wang J, He M, Wang C, Li H. 2025. Dynamics of proton flux in the South Atlantic Anomaly during the Super Geomagnetic Storm in May 2024, J Geophys Res Space Phys 130 (4): e2024JA033536. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033536. [Google Scholar]
Yamazaki, Y, Matzka J, da Silva MVS, Kervalishvili GN, Korte M, Rauberg J. 2024. Assessment of Kp=9 geomagnetic storms including the May 2024 “Gannon Storm” based on version 3.0 Hpo Indices. Submitted Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.171838396.68563140/v2. [Google Scholar]
Yatsenko, VO, Ivanov SM, Parnowski A, Vlasov D. 2019. Guaranteed NARMAX model for the prediction of geomagnetic Dst index. J Phys Stud 23 (1): 1901. https://doi.org/10.30970/jps.23.1901. [Google Scholar]
Younas, W, Nishimura Y, Liao W, Semeter JL, Mrak S, Morton YJ, Groves KM. 2025. Spatio-temporal evolution of mid-latitude GPS scintillation and position errors during the May 2024 solar storm. J Geophys Res Space Phys 130 (6): e2025JA033839. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JA033839. [Google Scholar]
Zhang, R, Liu L, Yang Y, Li W, Zhao X, Yoshikawa A, Tariq MA, Chen Y, Le H. 2024. Ionosphere responses over Asian-Australian and American sectors to the 10–12 May 2024 superstorm. J Geophys Res Space Phys 129 (12): 2024JA033071. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033071. [Google Scholar]
Zhang, Y, Paxton LJ, Schaefer R, Swartz WH. 2022. Thermospheric conditions associated with the loss of 40 Starlink satellites. Space Weather 20 (10): e2022SW003168. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.