Table 2
Trends related to the integral estimate on the map, for each dataset and energy distribution. The estimate is considered correct to be within ±30% of the experimental integral value. This table is associated with Figures 12 and 13. More explanations can be found in Section 4.4. *The acronym q.m corresponds to a quasi-monoenergetic distribution.
| Integral | Dataset 1 – Maxw | Dataset 1 – q.m* | Dataset 2 – Maxw | Dataset 2 – q.m* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % correct estimate | 86.4% | 83.4% | 49.8% | 72.6% |
| % under estimation | 1.4% | 16.5% | 4.4% | 27.4% |
| % over estimation | 12.2% | 0.1% | 45.8% | 0% |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.