Table 1
Comparison between selected photometric sum series in Ca II K.
Series | Mean relative | Mean absolute relative | RMS | R | R 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chatzistergos et al. (2020a) SFO – Chatzistergos et al. (2020a) Rome/PSPT | 0.016 | 0.11 | 1312 | 0.98 | 0.95 |
Chapman et al. (2013) SFO – Chatzistergos et al. (2020a) SFO | 0.010 | 0.10 | 1331 | 0.97 | 0.95 |
Chapman et al. (2013) SFO – Chatzistergos et al. (2020a) SFO | 0.021 | 0.12 | 1176 | 0.98 | 0.96 |
Note. Shown are mean relative, mean absolute relative, and RMS differences [Wm−2] as well as the linear correlation coefficient, R, and R2. The differences are computed after linearly scaling the photometric sum series to match those from Rome/PSPT (shown as dashed lines in Fig. 6).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.