Issue
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 3, 2013
Space Weather and Challenges for Modern Society
Article Number A28
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2013050
Published online 23 August 2013
  • Elphinstone, R.D., K. Jankowska, J.S. Murphree, and L.L. Cogger, The configuration of the auroral distribution for interplanetary magnetic field Bz northward. I – IMF Bx and By dependencies as observed by the Viking satellite, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 5791–5804, 1990. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harang, L., The mean field of the polar earth-magnetic storm, Geofysiske Publikasjoner (Geophysica Norwegica), 16, 1–44, 1946a. [Google Scholar]
  • Harang, L., The mean field of disturbance of polar geomagnetic storms, Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity (J. Geophys. Res.), 51, 353, 1946b. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heppner, J.P., The Harang discontinuity in auroral belt ionospheric currents, Geofysiske Publikasjoner (Geophysica Norwegica), 29, 105–120, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  • Kabin, K., R. Rankin, G. Rostoker, R. Marchand, I.J. Rae, A.J. Ridley, T.I. Gombosi, C.R. Clauer, and D.L. DeZeeuw, Open-closed field line boundary position: a parametric study using an MHD model, J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.), 109, A05222, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kisabeth, J.L., and G. Rostoker, Development of the polar electrojet during polar magnetic substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 6815, 1971. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Machol, J.L., J.C. Green, R.J. Redmon, R.A. Viereck, and P.T. Newell, Evaluation of OVATION Prime as a forecast model for visible aurorae, Space Weather, 10, S03005, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Milan, S.E., M. Lester, S.W.H. Cowley, K. Oksavik, M. Brittnacher, R.A. Greenwald, G. Sofko, and J.-P. Villain, Variations in the polar cap area during two substorm cycles, Ann. Geophys., 21, 1121–1140, 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Milan, S.E., G. Provan, and B. Hubert, Magnetic flux transport in the Dungey cycle: a survey of dayside and nightside reconnection rates, J. Geophys. Res., 112, A01209, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Newell, P.T., T. Sotirelis, J.M. Ruohoniemi, J.F. Carbary, K. Liou, J.P. Skura, C.-I. Meng, C. Deehr, D. Wilkinson, and F.J. Rich, OVATION: oval variation, assessment, tracking, intensity, and online nowcasting, Ann. Geophys., 20, 1039–1047, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Newell, P.T., T. Sotirelis, K. Liou, A.R. Lee, S. Wing, J. Green, and R. Redmon, Predictive ability of four auroral precipitation models as evaluated using Polar UVI global images, Space Weather, 8, S12004, 2010a. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Newell, P.T., T. Sotirelis, and S. Wing, Seasonal variations in diffuse, monoenergetic, and broadband aurora, J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.), 115, A03216, 2010b. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rae, I.J., K. Kabin, J.Y. Lu, R. Rankin, S.E. Milan, F.R. Fenrich, C.E.J. Watt, J.-C. Zhang, A.J. Ridley, T.I. Gombosi, C.R. Clauer, G. Tóth, and D.L. DeZeeuw, Comparison of the open-closed separatrix in a global magnetospheric simulation with observations: the role of the ring current, J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.), 115, A08216, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rostoker, G., and J.L. Kisabeth, Response of the polar electrojets in the evening sector to polar magnetic substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 5559, 1973. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rostoker, G., K. Kawasaki, T.J. Hughes, J.D. Winningham, and J.R. Burrows, Energetic particle precipitation into the high-latitude ionosphere and the auroral electrojets. II – Eastward electrojet and field-aligned current flow at the dusk meridian, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 2006–2018, 1979. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sigernes, F., M. Dyrland, P. Brekke, S. Chernouss, D.A. Lorentzen, K. Oksavik, and C. Sterling Deehr, Two methods to forecast auroral displays, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 1, A03, 2011. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Starkov, G., Mathematical model of the auroral boundaries, Geomag. Aeron., 34, 331–336, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • Vennerstrom, S., E. Friis-Christensen, T.S. Jorgensen, O. Rasmussen, C.R. Clauer, and V.B. Wickwar, Ionospheric currents and F-region plasma boundaries near the dayside cusp, Geophys. Res. Lett., 11, 903906, 1984. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Walker, J.K., Space-time associations of the aurora and magnetic disturbance, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 26, 951–954, 1964. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wallis, D.D., G. Rostoker, and C.D. Anger, The spatial relationship of auroral electrojets and visible aurora in the evening sector, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 2857–2869, 1976. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weimer, D.R., Improved ionospheric electrodynamic models and application to calculating Joule heating rates, J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.), 110, A05306, 2005a. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weimer, D.R., Predicting surface geomagnetic variations using ionospheric electrodynamic models, J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.), 110, A12307, 2005b. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Winningham, J.D., K. Kawasaki, and G. Rostoker, Energetic particle precipitation into the high-latitude ionosphere and the auroral electrojets. I – Definition of electrojet boundaries using energetic electron spectra and ground-based magnetometer data, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 1993–2005, 1979. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang, Y., and L.J. Paxton, An empirical Kp-dependent global auroral model based on TIMED/GUVIFUV data, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 70, 1231–1242, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.