The DTM-2013 thermosphere model
J. Space Weather Space Clim., 5 (2015) A1
Published online: 2015-02-03
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2020 Proceedings: Volume II
Wenhui Cui, Wei Qu, Haiyue Li, et al.Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2020 Proceedings: Volume II 651 36 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3711-0_4
Improved Orbit Gravity Error Covariance for Orbit Determination
Fabian Schiemenz, James Woodburn, Vincent Coppola, Jens Utzmann and Hakan KayalJournal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 43 (9) 1671 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G004918
Extended forward and inverse modeling of radiation pressure accelerations for LEO satellites
Kristin Vielberg and Jürgen KuscheJournal of Geodesy 94 (4) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01368-6
Stable extension of the unified model into the mesosphere and lower thermosphere
Matthew J. Griffith, David R. Jackson, Daniel J. Griffin and Chris J. BuddJournal of Space Weather and Space Climate 10 19 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020018
(2020)
https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10504517.1
Optimal planning for a multiple space debris removal mission using high-accuracy low-thrust transfers
Mikkel K. Jorgensen and Inna SharfActa Astronautica 172 56 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.03.031
(2020)
https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10502187.2
The Space Weather Atmosphere Models and Indices (SWAMI) project: Overview and first results
David R. Jackson, Sean Bruinsma, Sandra Negrin, et al.Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate 10 18 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020019
A simultaneous calibration and data assimilation (C/DA) to improve NRLMSISE00 using thermospheric neutral density (TND) from space-borne accelerometer measurements
E Forootan, S Farzaneh, M Kosary, M Schmidt and M SchumacherGeophysical Journal International 224 (2) 1096 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa507
Thermosphere densities derived from Swarm GPS observations
Jose van den IJssel, Eelco Doornbos, Elisabetta Iorfida, et al.Advances in Space Research 65 (7) 1758 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.01.004
Accurate estimation of relative atmospheric density error on the example of uncertain geomagnetic activity information
Fabian Schiemenz, Jens Utzmann and Hakan KayalAdvances in Space Research 65 (1) 251 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.08.023
Calibration of atmospheric density model based on Gaussian Processes
Tianyu Gao, Hao Peng and Xiaoli BaiActa Astronautica 168 273 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.12.014
Adaptive Gaussian Mixture based orbit determination with combined atmospheric density uncertainty consideration
Fabian Schiemenz, Jens Utzmann and Hakan KayalAdvances in Space Research 66 (7) 1609 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.05.042
Impact of Thermospheric Mass Density on the Orbit Prediction of LEO Satellites
Changyong He, Yang Yang, Brett Carter, Kefei Zhang, Andong Hu, Wang Li, Florent Deleflie, Robert Norman and Suqin WuSpace Weather 18 (1) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002336
Propagation of grid-scale density model uncertainty to orbital uncertainties
Fabian Schiemenz, Jens Utzmann and Hakan KayalAdvances in Space Research 65 (1) 407 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.10.013
152 219 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2020_123
APOD mission status and preliminary results
Geshi Tang, Xie Li, Jianfeng Cao, et al.Science China Earth Sciences 63 (2) 257 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-018-9362-6
Satellite Dynamics and Space Missions
Anne LemaîtreSpringer INdAM Series, Satellite Dynamics and Space Missions 34 115 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20633-8_3
Propagating EUV solar flux uncertainty to atmospheric density uncertainty
Fabian Schiemenz, Jens Utzmann and Hakan KayalAdvances in Space Research 63 (12) 3936 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.02.040
Quantifying the Storm Time Thermospheric Neutral Density Variations Using Model and Observations
E. Ceren Kalafatoglu Eyiguler, J. S. Shim, M. M. Kuznetsova, Z. Kaymaz, B. R. Bowman, M. V. Codrescu, S. C. Solomon, T. J. Fuller‐Rowell, A. J. Ridley, P. M. Mehta and E. K. SuttonSpace Weather 17 (2) 269 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW002033
Least squares orbit estimation including atmospheric density uncertainty consideration
Fabian Schiemenz, Jens Utzmann and Hakan KayalAdvances in Space Research 63 (12) 3916 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.02.039
Time-varying solar radiation pressure on Ajisai in comparison with LAGEOS satellites
Akihisa Hattori and Toshimichi OtsuboAdvances in Space Research 63 (1) 63 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.08.010
Assessment of Thermosphere Models Based on Orbit Prediction
Wei LIU, Jiancun GONG, Siqing LIU and Ronglan WANGChinese Journal of Space Science 39 (6) 757 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.11728/cjss2019.06.757
The International Community Coordinated Modeling Center Space Weather Modeling Capabilities Assessment: Overview of Ionosphere/Thermosphere Activities
L. Scherliess, I. Tsagouri, E. Yizengaw, S. Bruinsma, J. S. Shim, A. Coster and J. M. RettererSpace Weather 17 (4) 527 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW002036
Long-Term Rotational Motion Analysis and Comparison to Observations of the Inoperative Envisat
Luc B. M. Sagnières and Inna SharfJournal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 42 (2) 364 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003647
Solar cycle, seasonal, and asymmetric dependencies of thermospheric mass density disturbances due to magnetospheric forcing
Andres Calabia and Shuanggen JinAnnales Geophysicae 37 (5) 989 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-989-2019
2132 190008 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5119680
High-fidelity geometry models for improving the consistency of CHAMP, GRACE, GOCE and Swarm thermospheric density data sets
G. March, E.N. Doornbos and P.N.A.M. VisserAdvances in Space Research 63 (1) 213 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.07.009
Towards thermospheric density estimation from SLR observations of LEO satellites: a case study with ANDE-Pollux satellite
Francesca Panzetta, Mathis Bloßfeld, Eren Erdogan, et al.Journal of Geodesy 93 (3) 353 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1165-8
Review and comparison of empirical thermospheric mass density models
Changyong He, Yang Yang, Brett Carter, et al.Progress in Aerospace Sciences 103 31 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.10.003
(2018)
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-2341
A New Method to Retrieve Thermospheric Parameters From Daytime Bottom‐Side Ne(h) Observations
L. Perrone and A. V. MikhailovJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 123 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025762
Research on the impact factors of GRACE precise orbit determination by dynamic method
Nan-nan Guo, Xu-hua Zhou, Kai Li and Bin WuJournal of Applied Geodesy 12 (3) 249 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2018-0008
A deployable mechanism concept for the collection of small-to-medium-size space debris
David St-Onge, Inna Sharf, Luc Sagnières and Clément GosselinAdvances in Space Research 61 (5) 1286 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.12.026
A New Method of Physics‐Based Data Assimilation for the Quiet and Disturbed Thermosphere
Eric K. SuttonSpace Weather 16 (6) 736 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017SW001785
Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data
Kai Li, Xuhua Zhou, Wenbin Wang, Yang Gao, Gang Zhao, Enzhe Tao and Kexin XuSensors 18 (8) 2671 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082671
International Symposium on Advancing Geodesy in a Changing World
Sergei Rudenko, Michael Schmidt, Mathis Bloßfeld, Chao Xiong and Hermann LührInternational Association of Geodesy Symposia, International Symposium on Advancing Geodesy in a Changing World 149 119 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2018_40
EUV Irradiance Inputs to Thermospheric Density Models: Open Issues and Path Forward
A. Vourlidas and S. BruinsmaSpace Weather 16 (1) 5 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017SW001725
An empirical model of the thermospheric mass density derived from CHAMP satellite
Chao Xiong, Hermann Lühr, Michael Schmidt, Mathis Bloßfeld and Sergei RudenkoAnnales Geophysicae 36 (4) 1141 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1141-2018
Thermospheric Variations From GNSS and Accelerometer Measurements on Small Satellites
Shuanggen Jin, Andres Calabia and Liangliang YuanProceedings of the IEEE 106 (3) 484 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2018.2796084
Reply to Comment by Zhang et al. on the Paper “Long‐Term Variations of Exospheric Temperature Inferred From foF1 Observations: A Comparison to ISR Ti Trend Estimates” by Perrone and Mikhailov
L. Perrone and A. V. MikhailovJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 123 (10) 8895 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JA025039
Solar EUV Flux Proxy Using Multifrequency Solar Radio Flux
Yongliang Zhang and Larry J. PaxtonSpace Weather 16 (5) 434 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2017SW001763
A New Transformative Framework for Data Assimilation and Calibration of Physical Ionosphere‐Thermosphere Models
Piyush M. Mehta and Richard LinaresSpace Weather 16 (8) 1086 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001875
Seasonal variations of thermospheric mass density at dawn/dusk from GOCE observations
Libin Weng, Jiuhou Lei, Eelco Doornbos, Hanxian Fang and Xiankang DouAnnales Geophysicae 36 (2) 489 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-489-2018
The First Comparison Between Swarm‐C Accelerometer‐Derived Thermospheric Densities and Physical and Empirical Model Estimates
Timothy Kodikara, Brett Carter and Kefei ZhangJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 123 (6) 5068 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JA025118
BeiDou Geostationary Satellite Code Bias Modeling Using Fengyun-3C Onboard Measurements
Kecai Jiang, Min Li, Qile Zhao, Wenwen Li and Xiang GuoSensors 17 (11) 2460 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3390/s17112460
Comparison of precise orbit determination methods of zero-difference kinematic, dynamic and reduced-dynamic of GRACE-A satellite using SHORDE software
Kai Li, Xuhua Zhou, Nannan Guo, et al.Journal of Applied Geodesy 11 (3) 157 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2017-0004
The 30 cm radio flux as a solar proxy for thermosphere density modelling
Thierry Dudok de Wit and Sean BruinsmaJournal of Space Weather and Space Climate 7 A9 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017008
Solar radio proxies for improved satellite orbit prediction
Philippe Yaya, Louis Hecker, Thierry Dudok de Wit, Clémence Le Fèvre and Sean BruinsmaJournal of Space Weather and Space Climate 7 A35 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017032
A smooth and robust Harris-Priester atmospheric density model for low Earth orbit applications
Noble Hatten and Ryan P. RussellAdvances in Space Research 59 (2) 571 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.10.015
Propagation of atmospheric density errors to satellite orbits
J.T. Emmert, H.P. Warren, A.M. Segerman, J.M. Byers and J.M. PiconeAdvances in Space Research 59 (1) 147 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.07.036
Semi-empirical thermosphere model evaluation at low altitude with GOCE densities
Sean Bruinsma, Daniel Arnold, Adrian Jäggi and Noelia Sánchez-OrtizJournal of Space Weather and Space Climate 7 A4 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017003
Forecasting Kp from solar wind data: input parameter study using 3-hour averages and 3-hour range values
Peter Wintoft, Magnus Wik, Jürgen Matzka and Yuri ShpritsJournal of Space Weather and Space Climate 7 A29 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017027
Effect of the solar activity variation on the Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model (GITM)
Davide Masutti, Günther March, Aaron J. Ridley and Jan ThoemelAnnales Geophysicae 34 (9) 725 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-725-2016
Validation of Earth atmosphere models using solar EUV observations from the CORONAS and PROBA2 satellites in occultation mode
Vladimir Slemzin, Artyom Ulyanov, Konstantin Gaikovich, et al.Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate 6 A7 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2015045
Complexity of the Earth’s space–atmosphere interaction region (SAIR) response to the solar flux at 10.7 cm as seen through the evaluation of five solar cycle two-line element (TLE) records
Karan Molaverdikhani, Ali Ajabshirizadeh, Pantea Davoudifar and Majid LashkanpourAdvances in Space Research 58 (6) 924 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.05.035
The Space Environment and Its Effects on Space Systems, Second Edition
The Space Environment and Its Effects on Space Systems, Second Edition 525 (2016)https://doi.org/10.2514/5.9781624103537.0525.0596
The impact of the atmospheric model and of the space weather data on the dynamics of clouds of space debris
Alexis Petit and Anne LemaitreAdvances in Space Research 57 (11) 2245 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.005
Thermospheric mass density: A review
J.T. EmmertAdvances in Space Research 56 (5) 773 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.05.038