Technical Article

Variability in footpoint mapping of bursty bulk flows using Tsyganenko models: impact on swarm conjunctions

¹ Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Institutet för rymdfysik, Box 537, 751 21 Uppsala, Sweden
² Institute of Space Science, Bucharest, Măgurele 077125, Rumania

^* Corresponding author: vanina.lanabere@irfu.se

Received: 26 September 2024
Accepted: 21 July 2025

Abstract

Magnetospheric-ionospheric coupling studies often rely on multi-spacecraft conjunctions, which require accurate magnetic field mapping tools. For example, linking measurements from the magnetotail with those in the ionosphere involves determining when the orbital magnetic footpoint of THEMIS or Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) intersects with the footpoint of Swarm. The Tsyganenko models are commonly used for tracing magnetic field lines. In this study, we aim to analyze how the footpoint locations are impacted by the input parameters of these models, including solar wind conditions, geomagnetic activity, and the location in the magnetotail. A dataset of 2394 bursty bulk flows (BBFs) detected by MMS was mapped to Earth’s ionosphere with six different Tsyganenko models. Approximately 90% of the ionospheric footpoints are concentrated within 70° ± 5° magnetic latitude (MLAT) and ±3 h of magnetic local time (MLT) around midnight, with a pronounced peak in the pre-midnight sector. The MLT position showed a difference of approximately ±1 h MLT across the models. Footpoint locations were linked to the dawn-dusk position of the BBFs, with differences between models associated with variations in the interplanetary magnetic field clock angle. The MLAT values exhibited similar differences of approximately ±4° around the mean value, with a systematic shift toward lower latitudes in the T89 model. This position is also influenced by the input parameters of the model representing the dynamics of Earth’s magnetosphere, where stronger magnetospheric activity typically corresponds to lower latitudes. The uncertainty on the BBF footpoint location impacts the number of conjunctions with Swarm. Generally, Swarm B exhibited more conjunctions than Swarm A or C in the Northern Hemisphere. However, when considering only Swarm-BBF conjunctions where the distance between footpoints computed with T89 and TA15n is smaller than the size of the BBF footprint, the number of conjunctions is reduced to less than half of the total.