Issue 
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 7, 2017



Article Number  A5  
Number of page(s)  13  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017004  
Published online  27 February 2017 
Research Article
Recurrence quantification analysis of two solar cycle indices
^{1}
INAFOsservatorio Astronomico di Roma, 00078
Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy
^{2}
INAFIstituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, 00133
Roma, Italy
^{*} Corressponding author: marco.stangalini@oaroma.inaf.it
Received:
26
November
2015
Accepted:
24
January
2017
Solar activity affects the whole heliosphere and nearEarth space environment. It has been reported in the literature that the mechanism responsible for the solar activity modulation behaves like a lowdimensional chaotic system. Studying these kind of physical systems and, in particular, their temporal evolution requires nonlinear analysis methods. To this regard, in this work we apply the recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) to the study of two of the most commonly used solar cycle indicators; i.e. the series of the sunspot number (SSN), and the radio flux 10.7 cm, with the aim of identifying possible dynamical transitions in the system; a task which is particularly suited to the RQA. The outcome of this analysis reveals the presence of large fluctuations of two RQA measures: namely the determinism and the laminarity. In addition, large differences are also seen between the evolution of the RQA measures of the SSN and the radio flux. That suggests the presence of transitions in the dynamics underlying the solar activity. Besides it also shows and quantifies the different nature of these two solar indices. Furthermore, in order to check whether our results are affected by dataartefacts, we have also applied the RQA to both the recently recalibrated SSN series and the previous one, unveiling the main differences between the two data sets. The results are discussed in light of the recent literature on the subject.
Key words: Sun: activity / Sun: sunspot / Sun: solar cycle / Sun: radio flux
© M. Stangalini et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2017
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
The impact of solar magnetism and its activity cycle on the heliosphere and nearEarth space is nowadays well recognized. Magnetic fields generated by dynamo processes in the interior of the Sun (Charbonneau 2014; Karak et al. 2014), and emerging to the solar atmosphere, modulate the flux of particles, radiation and magnetic field in the heliosphere. In our current technologydependent society, the impact of heliospheric changes driven by the solar activity is becoming increasingly important (Baker & Kanekal 2008; Hathaway & Wilson 2004; Jones et al. 2012), as well as the need for accurate forecasting of the conditions in the heliosphere (Hapgood 2012; Schrijver 2015).
Solar activity clearly shows a mean period of about 11 years, and variations in amplitude occurring on timescales longer than the main period.
Nonlinear analysis methods applied to different solar indices have shown that the solar activity cycle behaves as a lowdimensional chaotic and complex system (Consolini et al. 2009; Hanslmeier & Brajša 2010; Hanslmeier et al. 2013; Zhou et al. 2014). Hence, linear data analysis techniques, such as Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) or wavelet, applied to solar indices time series, can fail to give a complete description of the process represented by the investigated data. This is because in such techniques, nonlinearities are not preserved, meaning that a fundamental property of the system (i.e. its nonlinear behavior) cannot be studied at all. For a complete description and analysis of the shortcomings of applying linear techniques to nonlinear systems, we refer the reader to Huang et al. (1998).
To this regard, the analysis of the solar cycle indices in the phase space allowed a significant step forward in the understanding of the solar activity and its underlying dynamics (see for instance Consolini et al. 2009; Hanslmeier et al. 2013). Although, studying dynamical processes and gathering physical information from their phase space embedding is generally not straightforward, robust nonlinear techniques are available nowadays. In particular, over the last 30 years, a method of nonlinear data analysis has been developed to quantify the information contained in the phase space representation of a dynamical system. This method, which is called Recurrence Quantification Analysis (RQA; Marwan 2003), is based on the analysis of the recurrence plots (RPs; Eckmann et al. 1987) derived from the phase portraits of data series. Recurrence plots are diagrams representing in a 2D plot the distance between couples of states in the phase space, thus representing the recurrences of a system, a general property of dynamical systems already noticed by Poincaré (1890).
Many authors have already studied RPs of different solar indices (e.g. Sparavigna 2008; Deng 2015; Ghosh & Chatterjee 2015) or used them to investigate periodicities and hemispheric phase relationships of the indices themselves (see for instance Zolotova & Ponyavin 2007; Li 2008; Zolotova et al. 2010; Deng et al. 2013).
RQA was also successfully employed in the analysis of nonlinear systems in many different research fields (see e.g. Marwan et al. 2007, for a complete review of the topic) and, in particular, to uncover their dynamical transitions. However, as far as the authors know, in solar physics and heliophysics, this technique was only applied to study the temporal evolution of the deterministic states of the solar activity (Pastorek & Vörös 2002). In particular, the latter authors have applied the RQA to the sunspot number (SSN), with the aim of studying the intermittent nature of the solar activity cycle. The most interesting finding of their study was that, during the increasing phases of solar activity cycles, the determinism of the system is reduced, and this correlates with the highfrequency fluctuations of the SSN data. This is evidence for an increase of the intermittency of the analysed system, a feature which is easily uncovered by the RQA.
In this study, we extend the application of the RQA technique to solar data, by also investigating the laminarity of the solar cycle as represented by the most commonly used time series of solar indices, namely the SSN and the radio flux at 10.7 cm (hereafter also F10.7). Our primary goal is the study of the RQA measures in time and highlight possible differences between the two solar indicators. In addition, the results of this analysis may also advance our understanding of the underlying dynamics of the solar cycle and provide useful information to be incorporated in numerical models and simulations. Our investigation can also be regarded as a timely examination of solar activity data available nowadays. Indeed, very recently, the complete sequence of the SSN has been revised to account for several calibration issues that were identified in recent years (Clette et al. 2014; Clette & Lefèvre 2015). In this work we applied the RQA on both the previous and the new SSN data series, hereafter also SSN1 and SSN2, respectively. While this is done in order to test the sensitivity of our results to the impact of data inaccuracies and artefacts, this analysis is of more general interest, serving as a nonlinear comparison of the two SSN solar series.
2. Data set
Several indices have been introduced in order to represent the many different observables modulated by the solar cycle (Hathaway 2010; Ermolli et al. 2014).
The data analysed in our study consist of two time series, which are by far the most widely employed in the literature, the SSN (see e.g. Clette et al. 2014) and the solar radio emission at 10.7 cm (Tapping 2013, and references therein).
The SSN is defined accordingly to the formula introduced by Wolf (1851) as SSN = k(10G + N) where G is the number of sunspot groups, N is the number of individual sunspots in all groups visible on the solar disk from visual inspection of the solar photosphere in whitelight integrated radiation, and k denotes a correction factor that compensates for differences in observational techniques and instruments used by the observers in time.
SSN constitutes one of the longest continuous measurement programmes in the history of science. It is available since 1749 and although the series suffers discontinuities and uncertainties, it continues to be used as the most common index to describe and study solar cycle properties. As already mentioned, very recently, the SSN has been scrutinized and the series has been significantly revised (Cliver et al. 2013; Clette et al. 2014; Lefèvre & Clette 2014; Clette & Lefèvre 2015; Cliver et al. 2015) to account for discontinuities due to instrumental and observational practices. This led to the recent release (1st July 2015) of a new SSN data series. The revised sequence is available at SILSO.^{1} For detailed information on this series we refer the reader to the review of Clette et al. (2014). In this work we use this new data series, as well as the previous one for comparison, to test our results against the effects of the data revision. We restrict our attention to the analysis to the longest uninterrupted SSN record spanning the last 167 years from 1849 to 2015 (SILSO World Data Center 1949–2015). This is done in order to avoid gaps that are not suited to the RQA. Indeed, the presence of gaps would inject disruptions in the RPs that might be difficult to handle. In this regard, the use of gapfilling numerical techniques (see for instance Dudok de Wit 2011) may allow the extension of the RQA to earlier epochs of the sunspot record, where the analysis of dynamical transitions may offer interesting insights. However, in order to apply the RQA on such data series, a detailed analysis of the effects of gapfilling methods on the RPs and RQA measures themselves is needed.
It is important to remark that SSN is not a physical quantity, for this reason we complemented this data with uninterrupted weeklyaveraged measurements of the solar radio flux from 1958 to 2015 (Benz 2009; Tapping & Valdés 2011). These measurements result from the synoptic observations of the solar radio emission made at the various observatories since 1945 (Sullivan 2005) at different frequencies, ranging from 0.1 to 15 GHz.
Among the various radio measurements, we analysed those pertaining to the flux in the wavelength range of 2.8 GHz or, equivalently, 10.7 cm, near the peak of the observed solar radio emission, made by the National Research Council (NRC) of Canada from 1947 to 1991 in Ottawa and thereafter in Penticton. These measurements constitute the longest, most stable and wellcalibrated, almost uninterrupted record of direct physical data of the solar activity available to date (Svalgaard & Hudson 2010). The solar radio flux is measured using the Solar Flux Unit (SFU; 10^{−22} Wm^{−2} Hz^{−1}). A preliminary analysis of the effect of the averaging temporal window (not shown here) demonstrated that, as far as localization of the dynamical transitions is concerned, the choice of a weekly average of the data represented a good tradeoff between the signaltonoise ratio and the number of samples used. Although the F10.7 record is available since 1947, we noted that before 1958 a number of null samples were present. For this reason, and in order to be safe, we focused on the data starting from 1958 where the number of unavailable measurements was much more limited.
Figure 1 shows the weekly SSN2 and F10.7 values analysed in our study. Specifically the weekly averages were obtained with a sevenday average of the daily values. The SSN (both SSN1 and SSN2) and F10.7 data analysed derive from the archives at the Sunspot Index and Longterm Solar Observation Centre at the Royal Observatory of Belgium and Canadian Space Weather Forecast Centre,^{2} respectively. The series analysed in this study were retrieved in September 2015.
Fig. 1.
Time series of the weekly averaged values of SSN2 and F10.7 analysed in our study. 
3. Methods
The starting point of our analysis is the evaluation and study of the RPs from the phase reconstruction of the SSN2 and F10.7 series. Introduced by Eckmann et al. (1987), RPs are diagrams that visualize the trajectory of the system, represented by the analysed data series, in a 2D domain (Iwanski & Bradley 1998). In RPs, each point (i, j) of the diagram is shaded according to the distance between two points X_{i} and X_{j} on the trajectory in the phase space. The closeness of the states of the system at different times (recurrences) determines specific features and cluster of points in the plot, which describe the nature of the dynamical system. Indeed, recurrences are a characterizing property of any dynamical system (Kac 1947).
Figure 2 shows the thresholded RPs derived from the SSN2 (Fig. 2a) and F10.7 (Fig. 2b). For the sake of simplicity, the embedding parameter is m = 1 (no embedding), while the time delay parameter used to produce the phase portrait, from which the RP are obtained, is τ = 1. Indeed, Iwanski & Bradley (1998) have shown that, qualitatively, features of RPs generated from high embedding dimensions are also seen when using small embedding dimensions. This point will be further discussed in the next sections. The threshold used to construct the RPs is 15. In Figure 3 we show for comparison the RP of the unfiltered SSN1. The convention adopted throughout the manuscript is such that a recurrence state is marked by a black dot in the RPs. It is worth mentioning that transition markers in the RQA measures are rather insensitive to the exact choice of the embedding parameters, as demonstrated by Iwanski & Bradley (1998). The main features of plots of Figure 2 are discussed in Section 4.
Fig. 2.
(a) RP of the weekly unfiltered SSN2. (b) RP of the weekly unfiltered F10.7. The red box in the RP of the SSN identifies the period associated with the RP of the F10.7. (c) RP of the lowfrequency part of SSN2. (d) RP of the highfrequency part of SSN2. 
Fig. 3.
RP of of the weekly unfiltered SSN1 (no embedding). 
In order to extract quantitative information from RPs, we applied the RQA technique (see e.g. Zbilut & Webber 1992; Trulla et al. 1996; Thiel et al. 2004; Webber & Zbilut, 2005). This method is based on the analysis of the distributions of recurrence points in the vertical lines and the diagonal lines of RPs (for a review see e.g. Marwan 2003; Marwan et al. 2007). Indeed, diagonal lines in RPs identify trajectories that regularly visit the same region of the phase space at different times. This is a characteristic feature of deterministic systems. For this reason, the length of the diagonal lines in RPs represents a measure of determinism (DET). In contrast to this, vertical lines in RPs mark states which are trapped for some time. Thus the length of vertical lines in RPs can be regarded as a measure of the laminarity of the system (LAM).
The RQA also allows the study of other complexity indicators of dynamical systems, although these are not relevant to our aim (for a review see e.g. Zbilut & Webber 2006; Marwan et al. 2007). In this work, we restricted our attention to DET and LAM. These two measures have been successfully used several times to identify dynamical transitions (e.g. Marwan et al. 2013).
In order to estimate DET and LAM from RPs, in this work we used the welltested commandline recurrence plots code, which is part of the TOCSY (Toolboxes for Complex Systems) toolbox^{3} and, more in particular, its RQA utility and the timedelay embedding of the time series. For more information about the algorithms and methods employed in the toolbox (timedelay embedding, generation of RPs, and RQA application) we refer the reader to Marwan et al. (2007). In this code the embedding is performed through a timedelay technique. Given a timediscrete measurement of an observable u_{i} = u(iΔt), where i = 1,…N and Δt is the sampling time, the phase space can be reconstructed as follows:(1)where m is the embedding dimension, τ is the time delay, and e_{i} are unit vectors spanning an orthogonal coordinate system.
We applied the commandline recurrence plots code to the aforementioned solar indices with a moving window of 100 weeks and a step of 1 week. This was done to study the evolution of the RQA measures in time.
In order to quantify the effects of the new recalibration of SSN2, we also made use of Joint Recurrence Plots (JRPs; Marwan & Kurths 2004) that are suited for studying the similarities between two data series in the phase space, and specifically identifying times at which they share the same recurrences. A JRP is a plot showing all the times at which a recurrence in one dynamical system occurs simultaneously with a recurrence in another dynamical system. Indeed, a JRP is the Hadamard product of two RPs representing two dynamical systems.
In Figures 2a and 2b it is clear that RPs of the time series of such two indices are almost completely dominated by the lowfrequency modulation of the solar activity cycle (11 years). In order not to make the RQA measures biased by this modulation, both the SSN2 and F10.7 were highpass filtered. This was done, at first, by FFT filtering the data with a filter whose cutoff was set at 2 × 10^{−3} days^{−1} (see Fig. 4). Figures 2c and 2d we show the RP of the lowfrequency and highfrequency parts, respectively. However, we note that, in contrast to the RQA, the FFT technique is a linear method, thus it might not represent a suitable preconditioning technique to be used on the data. For this reason, and in order to independently check the reliability of the results, we also used the empirical mode decomposition (EMD; Huang et al. 1998) to filter out the lowfrequency dynamics. This was done only on the SSN2 to check the consistency of the results obtained from the FFT filtering. Indeed, the EMD technique preserves the nonlinearities of the signal, thus represents a more safe option for the preprocessing of the data examined in this work. The EMD analysis was already applied to decompose the solar cycle (to the SSN) in a series of intrinsic mode functions (IMFs; Gao 2016). It consists of an iterative process that, starting from the envelopes of maxima and minima estimates each IMF as the mean value of these two envelopes. The signal is therefore decomposed in a sequence of IMFs which are locally defined from the signal, without making use of any predefined decomposition basis or assumption, and that offer a datadriven decomposition of the signal. In Figure 5 we show the EMD decomposition of the SSN2 data series. By coadding the lowfrequency IMFs and the highfrequency IMFs, one can decouple the 11year longterm periodicity from the rest. In Figure 6 we show the result of that, where the highfrequency part of the signal (the one used in this work) is obtained by coadding the first seven IMFs (see blue box in Fig. 5). The highfrequency part of the data sequences is then studied with the RQA.
Fig. 4.
Power spectrum of SSN2 and highpass filter (a). Reconstructed lowfrequency (b) and highfrequency (c) parts of SSN2. 
Fig. 5.
EMD decomposition of the SSN2 data sequence. The first seven IMFs (blue box) are used as a representation of the highfrequency part of the signal. 
Fig. 6.
EMD reconstruction of the low (a) and highfrequency (b) parts of the SSN2. The highfrequency part of the signal is computed by coadding the first seven IMFs, while the lowfrequency part, not used in the RQA, by adding the remaining ones. 
As pointed out by many authors (see for instance Schinkel et al. 2008), the choice of the optimal embedding may have some impact on the exact value of RQA measures, but only a negligible effect on the position of the markers of dynamical transitions (Iwanski & Bradley 1998). Indeed, (Iwanski & Bradley 1998), by analysing the RPs of wellunderstood physical systems, have shown a good structural stability of RPs for different values of the embedding parameter. This means that, qualitatively, features in RPs are rather independent of the exact choice of the embedding. This is the case at least for those recurrence points that do not vanish in the RPs due to the change of the embedding itself. This property of RQA is recognized by the same authors as “counterintuitive”. In fact, since the embedding process is employed to unfold the dynamics, one would expect a dramatic change of the RP for different embeddings, but this is not the case. The same authors have also shown that, while the position of the dynamical markers in the RPs is insensitive to the choice of the embedding, a gradual fading of the main features of RPs is observed as the embedding dimension increases.
Formally, the optimal minimum embedding dimension is linked to the dimension of the chaotic system d, so that m ≥ 2d + 1 (see for instance Ma & Han 2006, and references therein). This implies that the dynamical system should be perfectly known before performing a phase space reconstruction. But this obviously makes a contradiction. In this regard, several methods were proposed to estimate the optimal embedding dimension m (see e.g. Fredkin & Rice 1995; Rhodes & Morari 1997). In particular, Sello (2001), using the false neighbor method (see for instance Kennel et al. 1992; Abarbanel et al. 1993), found that the minimum embedding dimension for the sunspot number is m = 5. This result indicates that the sunspot sequence is consistent to a lowdimensional system, in agreement with other independent works on the subject (e.g. Zhang 1996).
4. Results
4.1. Analysis of the RQA measures DET and LAM
Figure 2 shows the RPs derived from the SSN2 and F10.7 with no embedding (m = 1 and τ = 1). These RPs display the density of the recurrence states of the dynamical system represented by the two analysed series as a function of time. The RPs show a varying density of recurrences and, although most of the dynamics appears to be deterministic (see the large presence of diagonally aligned features), sudden interruptions can also be seen, as for example between 1955 and 1960. It is worth noting here that this period was identified as an unusual solar cycle (Wilson 1990; Temmer et al. 2006). The RP of the SSN2 also shows an interval affected by an increase in the density of recurrence points, which is located roughly between 1875 and 1940. While over long timescales, an almost constant 11year periodicity is evident as a repeating pattern of diagonal states, some modulation of this period can be found, for example, around 1900 as a small distortion of the diagonal features. All these elements are even more evident in the RP obtained from the lowfrequency part of SSN2 (Fig. 2c) and reflect the nonstationary nature of the process represented by the analysed series. Another interesting aspect of the RPs is the overdensity of recurrence points between ~2007 and 2010.
Figure 7 shows that the evolution of DET (Figs. 7a and 7b) and LAM (Figs. 7c and 7d) obtained by applying the RQA on the highpass filtered SSN2 time series, for both the FFT (Figs. 7a and 7c) and EMD (Figs. 7b and 7d) filtering. The embedding parameters are m = 5 and τ = 1. In the same plots we also display a nottoscale version of the SSN2 (orange curve) to help the reader in the comparison of the evolution of LAM and DET with the solar activity cycle. Following Marwan et al. (2013), we used an adaptive threshold in the sliding window employed to estimate the temporal variation of the RQA measures. This is done to maintain an optimal constant recurrence rate of the order of a few percent (10% in our case), and to keep the statistical sample constant within the sliding window. The adaptive threshold guarantees the stability of the recurrences over the temporal window considered. This is needed in order for the RQA measures not to reflect the intrinsic variations of the density of the recurrent points. Indeed, in the presence of a modulating recurrence rate, this modulation can enter the other RQA measures, preventing the analysis of the true fluctuations of DET and LAM. Since the RQA measures are statistical values estimated from the distribution of points in the moving temporal window, it is of paramount importance to dynamically adapt the threshold in such a way that the density of recurrent points in different temporal windows in the RP remains constant. In our case, the standard deviation of the recurrence rate is reduced at 0.7% by the adaptive threshold.
Fig. 7.
Evolution of DET (a, b) and LAM (c, d) obtained from the SSN2 for both filtering strategies (grey dots): FFT (a, c) and EMD (b, d). The continuous line represents a smoothed version of both DET and LAM. The shaded areas highlight the times at which significant mismatches in the evolution of DET and LAM are observed. The orange curve represents a rescaled version of the SSN2 to help the reader identifying the solar cycles. The horizontal blue lines represent the 95% confidence level. 
The 10% is chosen in such a way that the RQA measures do not show saturation or clipping. However, Marwan (2011) has shown that the selection of the threshold is not critical.
As already mentioned, the size of the sliding window used in the RQA (~2 years) is chosen to accurately sample the underlying periodicity of the solar cycle, while maintaining the computational load at a reasonable level.
The results obtained by using the two filtering techniques (i.e. FFT and EMD) are rather similar, and both show large fluctuations of DET and LAM. Some of these fluctuations appear in correspondence of the minima of SSN2 (see e.g. the peak within 1970–1980), however this is not always the case. More important, there exist specific times where LAM and DET show a different behaviour. This is the case, for instance, around ≃1900 and during the last minimum (2005–2008). In these two periods, in fact, LAM appears more pronounced than DET, suggesting a possible increase of the laminarity of the system.
In the same plots, we also show with horizontal continuous lines the 95% confidence levels as obtained from a significance test as in Marwan et al. (2013). More in depth, the significance test is based upon a randomization (random permutation) of the SSN2 to get rid of any temporal correlation in the signal. After the randomization of the time series, the RQA is applied in order to estimate the 95% confidence level of each RQA measure. Since the resulting RQA measures obtained from the randomized signal show a nongaussian distribution, we used the cumulative distribution function (CDF) to select the threshold corresponding to the 95% confidence level. This analysis reveals that most of the peaks of DET and LAM are statistically significant, as they exceed the upper confidence level. In contrast, none of the “negative fluctuations” (minima) exceed the lower confidence level and can be considered statistically not significant.
In Figure 8 we compared the DET and LAM of the SSN2, with those of the F10.7 data sequence, in the time window where both measures are available (since 1958). It is interesting to note here that, while the filtering technique has a little effect on the RQA measures, the DET and LAM of the F10.7 present large differences with respect to the SSN2 sequence. This can be noted, for example, during the last minima where the F10.7 shows a sharper peak of both LAM and DET with respect to the SSN2. In addition, it is interesting to note that most of the pronounced peaks of DET and LAM obtained from F10.7 are located in proximity of the solar minima, although some is not (see e.g. the peak around 1980).
Fig. 8.
(a) Comparison of DET obtained from SSN2 (both filtering strategies) and F10.7 (FFT filtering). (b) Comparison of LAM obtained from SSN2 (both filtering strategies) and F10.7 (FFT filtering). The dotdashed vertical lines mark the position of the solar minima. The different data sequences have been shifted by a constant value for graphical reasons. 
4.2. Analysis of the fluctuations of the RQA measures
In order to investigate the oscillations seen in the RQA measures, here we study the power spectra of DET and LAM obtained from SSN2 (both filtering techniques) and F10.7 (see Fig. 9). Interestingly, the power spectra highlight differences between SSN2 and F10.7, and between DET and LAM. Indeed, while the power spectrum of DET parameter from the SSN2 shows three different peaks around 1 − 3 × 10^{−4} days^{−1} (11year period), 8 − 10 × 10^{−4} days^{−1} (threeyear period), and 16 − 3 × 10^{−4} days^{−1} (twoyear period), the last two peaks are absent in the power spectra of both LAM and DET from F10.7. In addition, restricting our attention to the power spectrum of the RQA measures from the SSN2, we note that the last peak aforementioned is much less pronounced in the spectrum of DET with respect to that of LAM. This suggest a different dynamical behaviour of the RQA measures and, more important, of the investigated solar indices. These differences will be further investigated in a future work.
Fig. 9.
Power spectrum of the DET obtained from SSN2 with FFT filtering (a), from SSN2 with EMD filtering (b), and from F10.7 with FFT filtering (c). 
4.3. Comparison between the new SSN data series and the previous one
Most of the works in the literature on largescale solar magnetism derive from the analysis, with different techniques, of the previous SSN1 series. In order to point out differences in the SSN1 and SSN2 that may be ascribed to the different calibration, we applied the RQA on both SSN1 and SSN2 series. Since we are interested in comparing the two data series, in this analysis we make use of unfiltered data. This is done in order to keep the recurrences of the system unchanged and allow the comparison of the two time series. In Figure 10a, we show the evolution of DET obtained from the RQA of both SSN1 and SSN2 with no embedding (i.e. embedding parameters m = 1 and τ = 1) and constant threshold ε = 5. The determinism of the SSN2 appears larger than that of SSN1. This is the case in correspondence of both minima and maxima of the solar cycle. In Figure 10b we also show the relative variation of DET of SSN2 with respect to DET of SSN1. The increase of DET is larger at the turning points of the solar cycle. In other words, the SSN2 data series shows a level of determinism significantly larger than the determinism of the previous SSN1 series; this is found at all times, but especially during the maxima of the solar cycle. In addition, this plot also shows a period of decreased DET variability between ~1947 and 1980 (see Fig. 10b). We note that this period corresponds with the wellknown “Waldmeier” jump, an issue that was previously identified through a comparison with the Sunspot Group Number, and finally corrected in the SSN2 release (Clette & Lefèvre 2015).
Fig. 10.
(a) Evolution of DET from SSN1 (black) and DET from SSN2 (red). (b) Relative increase of the determinism of SSN2 with respect to SSN1. 
However, we note that in general the recalibration of the SSN series has the only effect of changing the level of determinism of the system represented by the data, keeping the transition markers unchanged.
In order to better visualize the differences between the two SSN series, we made use of a JRP.
In Figure 11 we show the JRP of SSN2 and SSN1 without embedding, as in Figure 2. A first look at the JRP (Fig. 11) and the RPs in Figure 2 does reveal a remarkable similarity between SSN1 and SSN2.
Fig. 11.
JRP between SSN1 and SSN2 data series (no embedding). 
In the following we compare the two time series SSN1 and SSN2 with the F10.7 time series by using JRPs. Indeed, the comparison of the JRP obtained from SSN1 and F10.7, and the JRP obtained from SSN2 with F10.7, can reveal the presence of discrepancies between the two SSN time series much better than what the single JRP between SSN1 and SSN2 can.
4.4. Comparison between the two SSN data series, and F10.7
With the aim of singling intrinsic variations of the system out of data artefacts, in Figure 12 we also show the JRPs obtained from F10.7 and the previous SSN1 data series (Fig. 12a), and from the F10.7 and the new SSN2 (Fig. 12b). It is important to note that the two JRPs show some difference at specific epochs. More in particular, in the figure we highlight two specific regions (blue and red boxes, respectively) where the JRP of SSN1 and F10.7 shows a smaller number of simultaneous recurrences between the two time series. In comparison, the JRP of SSN2 and F10.7 (Fig. 12b) does show a more homogeneous distribution of simultaneous recurrence points in the same regions selected. This quantifies the effect of the recent recalibration of the SSN sequence as seen into the phase space.
Fig. 12.
JRPs of the SSN1 and F10.7 (a), and SSN2 and F10.7 (b). The boxes highlight different epochs in the JRPs where a clear difference between the two versions of SSN are observed (see text for more details). 
5. Discussions
The results derived from our RQA of the two solar cycle indices show that the determinism of the system represented by these two data series undergoes rapid fluctuations in time. This behaviour is consistent with previous findings by Pastorek & Vörös (2002), who explained this fact in terms of variation of the intermittency in the ascending and descending phases of the solar activity. In our study we have also extended this analysis to the laminarity of the system. After filtering out the lowfrequency solar cycle modulation (11year period), both LAM and DET show a modulation. While there exists some degree of correlation between LAM and DET, we have identified periods at which these two RQA measures present a different behaviour. Interestingly, one of them corresponds with last solar minimum, which has been longer than the previous ones. More in detail, during this times, the increase of LAM (increase level of disorder) is not accompanied by a similar increase of DET, suggesting an overall increase of the laminarity of the system.
Besides, a randomization test of the data sequences has shown that most of the peaks of DET and LAM, including those appearing during the last minimum, are statistically significant, with a confidence level exceeding 95%. These large fluctuations may suggest the presence of dynamical transitions Marwan et al. (2013). However, Schinkel et al. (2008) noted that determinism does not relate exactly to the mathematical notion of the term, but rather underlines that deterministic processes have usually a larger number of diagonal lines in RPs, if compared to purely stochastic processes. This may also explain the periods at which the increase of DET and LAM is synchronous. In this regard, Marwan et al. (2013) have also argued that, in some physical systems, the increase of the measure of DET together with that of LAM can be understood as a slowing down of the dynamics, typical of tipping points. These two facts together solve the apparent contradiction of the simultaneous increase of LAM and DET.
It is worth stressing that these results are obtained independently of the filtering technique (either FFT or EMD) adopted to remove the lowfrequency modulation of the solar cycle indices.
However, the results of the RQA include much more information than mentioned. Indeed, one of the most clear indications emerging from them is represented by the different dynamical behaviour of the two solar cycle indices investigated (SSN and F10.7). This is emerging not only from the temporal behaviour of the RQA measures of F10.7, whose peaks appear sharper than those obtained from SSN2, but also from the power spectra of DET and LAM fluctuations. In fact, while the power spectrum of the RQA measures of SSN2 presents power up to frequency of 1.7 − 2 × 10^{−3} days^{−1} (or equivalently periods in the range 1–2 years), the power spectrum of both LAM and DET of F10.7 appear limited to frequencies smaller than ~5 × 10^{−4} days^{−1}. These differences between the two indicators are not surprising. As already mentioned before, among the two, only F10.7 represents a physical quantity, SSN being the weighted count of the sunspots appearing on the solar disk over time. However, it is worth noting that the RQA provides a quantification of these differences, which in our opinion is helpful for uncovering the intrinsic meaning of the SSN.
In addition to this, in this work we also tested our results against the impact of the new SSN calibration. Although the above dynamical transitions occurring at the minima of the solar cycle are not sensitive to calibration issues, the JRP also reveals a significant number of discrepancies between the two data series which are, according to us, valueadded results with respect to the main scope of this work, providing information that can be of more general interest to the community. Indeed, since our analysis preserves the nonlinearities of the process, this comparison provides useful insight into the relationships between the SSN1 and SSN2, which are the most used solar index so far, and the one that will likely be the most commonly used in the future, respectively.
In more detail, although on average the new data series appears more deterministic, there exist specific times at which the SSN1 is characterized by less simultaneous recurrences with the F10.7 than the SSN2. This witness the improvements made by the SSN2 over the former SSN1 Clette & Lefèvre (2015), although the residual differences between the F10.7 and SSN2 may offer good reasons for further working on the revision of available series. However, it is useful to remark once again that our analysis method is appropriate for the analysis of the properties of nonlinear systems that might be particularly difficult to unveil with other techniques. For this reason the identification of differences between the SSN1, SSN2, and F10.7 in terms of recurrence states may provide useful complementary information with respect to other techniques. We also note that this topic deserves more attention and a more complete comparative analysis of other solar indices, which is beyond the scope here. This will be addressed in a future work.
6. Summary and conclusions
In this work we have shown the results of the application of the RQA on two indices of the solar cycle, namely the SSN and the F10.7. The RQA is nowadays a widely used technique to investigate nonlinear dynamical systems and their transitions, yet not fully exploited to investigate the solar activity cycle. The RPs, as well as the RQA measures demonstrate the nonstationarity of the system governing the activity cycle itself, with a strong modulation of the RQA measures, and fluctuations that may be linked to dynamical phase transition. Besides, the RQA unveils significant differences in the dynamics of SSN and F10.7, which reflects their different physical nature.
Furthermore, our application of the RQA to both SSN1 and SSN2 provides a timely nonlinear comparison between the newly recalibrated SSN data series and the previous one. Indeed, we found that SSN2, the new series, shows a larger degree of determinism with respect to the SSN1. Although this analysis was mainly performed to test our findings and the reliability of the transition markers of the dynamics, the results of the comparative study appear of more general validity and interest, providing a key reading for reconsidering the past literature based upon the SSN1 data series, in light of its recalibration.
Acknowledgments
This study received funding from the European Unions Seventh Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration, under the Grant Agreements of the eHEROES (n 284461, www.eheroes.eu), SOLARNET (n 312495, www.solarneteast.eu), and SOLID (n 313188, projects.pmodwrc.ch/solid/) projects. It was also supported by COST Action ES1005 TOSCA (www.toscacost.eu), by the Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, and the MIURPRIN Grant 2012P2HRCR on “The active Sun and its effects on Space and Earth climate”. Sunspot data from the World Data Center SILSO, Royal Observatory of Belgium, Brussels. The editor thanks four anonymous referees for their assistance in evaluating this paper.
The commandline recurrence plot code is freely available at the following link: http://tocsy.pikpotsdam.de/
References
 Abarbanel, H.D., R. Brown, J.J. Sidorowich, and L.S. Tsimring. The analysis of observed chaotic data in physical systems. Rev. Mod. Phys., 65 (4), 1331, 1993. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Baker, D., and S. Kanekal. Solar cycle changes, geomagnetic variations, and energetic particle properties in the inner magnetosphere. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 70 (2), 195–206, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Benz, A.O. 4.1. 1.6 Radio emission of the quiet Sun. In: Solar system, 103–115, Springer, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Charbonneau, P. Solar dynamo theory. Ann. Rev. Astr. Astrophys., 52, 251–290, 2014, DOI: 10.1146/annurevastro081913040012. [Google Scholar]
 Clette, F., and L. Lefèvre. The new Sunspot Number: assembling all corrections. Sol. Phys., 291, 2629–2651, 2015, DOI: 10.1007/s112070161014y. [Google Scholar]
 Clette, F., L. Svalgaard, J.M. Vaquero, and E.W. Cliver. Revisiting the Sunspot Number. A 400year perspective on the solar cycle. Space Sci. Rev., 186, 35–103, 2014, DOI: 10.1007/s1121401400742. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Cliver, E., F. Clette, and L. Svalgaard. Recalibrating the sunspot number (SSN): the SSN workshops. Cent. Eur. Astrophys. Bull., 37 (2), 401–416, 2013. [Google Scholar]
 Cliver, E., F. Clette, L. Svalgaard, and J. Vaquero. Recalibrating the Sunspot Number (SN): the 3rd and 4th SN workshops. Cent. Eur. Astrophys. Bull., 39, 1–19, 2015. [Google Scholar]
 Consolini, G., R. Tozzi, and P. de Michelis. Complexity in the sunspot cycle. A&A, 506, 1381–1391, 2009, DOI: 10.1051/00046361/200811074. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Deng, L. Nonlinear dynamics recognition in solar time series based on recurrence plot techniques. In: Information Science and Control Engineering (ICISCE), 2015 2nd International Conference on, IEEE, 843–847, 2015. [Google Scholar]
 Deng, L., B. Li, Y. Zheng, and X. Cheng. Relative phase analyses of 10.7 cm solar radio flux with sunspot numbers. New Astron., 23, 1–5, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Dudok de Wit, T. A method for filling gaps in solar irradiance and solar proxy data. A&A, 533, A29, 2011. [Google Scholar]
 Eckmann, J.P., S.O. Kamphorst, and D. Ruelle. Recurrence plots of dynamical systems. Europhys. Lett., 4 (9), 973, 1987. [Google Scholar]
 Ermolli, I., K. Shibasaki, A. Tlatov, and L. van DrielGesztelyi. Solar Cycle Indices from the photosphere to the corona: measurements and underlying physics. Space Sci. Rev., 186, 105–135, 2014. [Google Scholar]
 Fredkin, D.R., and J.A. Rice. Method of false nearest neighbors. A cautionary note. Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, 51 (4), 2950, 1995. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Gao, P.X. Longterm trend of sunspot numbers. Astrophys. J., 830 (2), 140, 2016, URL http://stacks.iop.org/0004637X/830/i=2/a=140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Ghosh, O., and T. Chatterjee. On the signature of chaotic dynamics in 10.7 cm daily solar radio flux. Sol. Phys., 290 (11), 3319–3330, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Hanslmeier, A., and R. Brajša. The chaotic solar cycle. I. Analysis of cosmogenic ^{14}C data. 509, A5, 2010, DOI: 10.1051/00046361/200913095. [Google Scholar]
 Hanslmeier, A., R. Brajša, J. Čalogović, B. Vršnak, D. Ruždjak, F. Steinhilber, C.L. MacLeod, Ž. Ivezić, and I. Skokić. The chaotic solar cycle. II. Analysis of cosmogenic ^{10}Be data. A&A, 550, A6, 2013, DOI: 10.1051/00046361/201015215. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Hapgood, M. Astrophysics: prepare for the coming space weather storm. Nature, 484 (7394), 311–313, 2012. [Google Scholar]
 Hathaway, D.H. The solar cycle. Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 7, 1, 2010, DOI: 10.12942/lrsp20101. [Google Scholar]
 Hathaway, D.H., and R.M. Wilson. What the sunspot record tells us about space climate. Sol. Phys., 224, 5–19, 2004. [Google Scholar]
 Huang, N.E., Z. Shen, S.R. Long, M.C. Wu, H.H. Shih, Q. Zheng, N.C. Yen, C.C. Tung, and H.H. Liu. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis. Proc. R. Soc. of Lon. A, 454 (1971), 903–995, 1998, DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1998.0193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Iwanski, J.S., and E. Bradley. Recurrence plots of experimental data: to embed or not to embed? Chaos, 8 (4), 861–871, 1998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Jones, G.S., M. Lockwood, and P.A. Stott. What influence will future solar activity changes over the 21st century have on projected global nearsurface temperature changes? J. Geophys. Res. [Atmos.] (1984–2012), 117, D5, 2012, DOI: 10.1029/2011JD017013. [Google Scholar]
 Kac, M. On the notion of recurrence in discrete stochastic processes. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 53 (10), 1002–1010, 1947. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
 Karak, B.B., J. Jiang, M.S. Miesch, P. Charbonneau, and A.R. Choudhuri. Flux transport dynamos: from kinematics to dynamics. Space Sci. Rev., 186, 561–602, 2014, DOI: 10.1007/s1121401400996. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Kennel, M.B., R. Brown, and H.D. Abarbanel. Determining embedding dimension for phasespace reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Phys. Rev. A: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 45, 3403, 1992. [Google Scholar]
 Lefèvre, L., and F. Clette. Survey and merging of sunspot catalogs. Sol. Phys., 289 (2), 545–561, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Li, Q. Periodicity and hemispheric phase relationship in highlatitude solar activity. Sol. Phys., 249 (1), 135–145, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Ma, H.G., and C.Z. Han. Selection of embedding dimension and delay time in phase space reconstruction. Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. Chin., 1 (1), 111–114, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Marwan, N. Encounters with neighbours: current developments of concepts based on recurrence plots and their applications, University of Potsdam, 2003. [Google Scholar]
 Marwan, N. How to avoid potential pitfalls in recurrence plot based data analysis. Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos, 21 (04), 1003–1017, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Marwan, N., M. CarmenRomano, M. Thiel, and J. Kurths. Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems. Phys. Rep., 438 (5), 237–329, 2007. [Google Scholar]
 Marwan, N., and J. Kurths. Cross recurrence plots and their applications. In: C.V. Benton, Editor. Mathematical physics research at the cutting edge, , Nova Science Publisher, Inc., 101–139, ISBN 1590339398, 2004. [Google Scholar]
 Marwan, N., S. Schinkel, and J. Kurths. Recurrence plots 25 years later gaining confidence in dynamical transitions. Europhys. Lett., 101 (2), 20007, 2013. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Pastorek, L., and Z. Vörös. Nonlinear analysis of solar cycle variability. In: A. Wilson, Editor. Solar variability: from core to outer frontiers, vol. 506, ESA Special Publication, Noordwijk 197–200, 2002. [Google Scholar]
 Poincaré, H. Sur le probleme des trois corps et les équations de la dynamique. Acta Math., 13 (1), A3–A270, 1890. [Google Scholar]
 Rhodes, C., and M. Morari. Falsenearestneighbors algorithm and noisecorrupted time series. Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, 55 (5), 6162, 1997. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Schinkel, S., O. Dimigen, and N. Marwan. Selection of recurrence threshold for signal detection. Euro. Phys. J. Special Top., 164 (1), 45–53, 2008. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Schrijver, C.J. Socioeconomic hazards and impacts of space weather: the important range between mild and extreme. Space Weather, 13, 524–528, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Sello, S. Solar cycle forecasting: a nonlinear dynamics approach. A&A, 377 (1), 312–320, 2001. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 SILSO World Data Center. The international sunspot number. International Sunspot Number Monthly Bulletin and Online Catalogue, 1949–2015. [Google Scholar]
 Sparavigna, A. Recurrence plots of sunspots, solar flux and irradiance. 2008, arXiv preprint arXiv:0804.1941. [Google Scholar]
 Sullivan, W.T. The early years of radio astronomy: reflections fifty years after Jansky’s discovery. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005. [Google Scholar]
 Svalgaard, L., and H.S. Hudson. The solar microwave flux and the sunspot number. In: SOHO23: Understanding a Peculiar Solar Minimum, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, S.R., Cranmer, J.T. Hoeksema, and J.L. Kohl, 428, 325, 2010, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ASPC.428.325S. [Google Scholar]
 Tapping, K. The 10.7 cm solar radio flux (F10. 7). Space Weather, 11 (7), 394–406, 2013. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Tapping, K.F., and J.J. Valdés. Did the sun change its behaviour during the decline of cycle 23 and into cycle 24? Sol. Phys., 272, 337–350, 2011, DOI: 10.1007/s1120701198271. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Temmer, M., J. Rybák, P. Bendk, A. Veronig, F. Vogler, W. Otruba, W. Pötzi, and A. Hanslmeier. Hemispheric sunspot numbers {R_{n}} and {R_{s}} from 1945–2004: catalogue and NS asymmetry analysis for solar cycles 18–23. A&A, 447, 735–743, 2006, DOI: 10.1051/00046361:20054060. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Thiel, M., M.C. Romano, and J. Kurths. How much information is contained in a recurrence plot? Phys. Lett. A, 330 (5), 343–349, 2004. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
 Trulla, L., A. Giuliani, J. Zbilut, and C. Webber Jr. Recurrence quantification analysis of the logistic equation with transients. Phys. Lett. A, 223 (4), 255–260, 1996. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Webber Jr., C.L., and J.P. Zbilut. Recurrence quantification analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems. In: M.A., Riley, and G. Van Orden. Editors, Tutorials in Contemporary Nonlinear Methods for the Behavioral Sciences, 26–94, 2005, Retrieved December 1, 2004 http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/bcs/pac/nmbs/nmbs.pdf. [Google Scholar]
 Wilson, R.M. On the level of skill in predicting maximum sunspot number – a comparative study of single variate and bivariate precursor techniques. Sol. Phys., 125, 143–155, 1990, DOI: 10.1007/BF00154784. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Wolf, R. Universal sunspot numbers: sunspot observations in the second part of the year 1850. Mitt. Nat. Ges. Bern, 1, 89–95, 1851. [Google Scholar]
 Zbilut, J.P., and C.L. Webber Jr. Recurrence quantification analysis. In: R., Wolf. Editor, Wiley encyclopedia of biomedical engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2006, DOI: 10.1002/9780471740360.edb1355 [Google Scholar]
 Zbilut, J. P, and C. L. Webber Jr. Embeddings and delays as derived from quantification of recurrence plots. Phys. Lett. A, 171 (3), 199–203, 1992. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Zhang, Q. A nonlinear prediction of the smoothed monthly sunspot numbers. A&A, 310, 646–650, 1996. [Google Scholar]
 Zhou, S., Y. Feng, W.Y. Wu, Y. Li, and J. Liu. Lowdimensional chaos and fractal properties of longterm sunspot activity. Res. Astron. Astrophys., 14 (1), 104, 2014. [Google Scholar]
 Zolotova, N., and D. Ponyavin. Synchronization in sunspot indices in the two hemispheres. Sol. Phys., 243 (2), 193–203, 2007. [Google Scholar]
 Zolotova, N., D. Ponyavin, R. Arlt, and I. Tuominen. Secular variation of hemispheric phase differences in the solar cycle. Astron. Nachr., 331 (8), 765–771, 2010. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cite this article as: Stangalini M, Ermolli I, Consolini G & Giorgi F. Recurrence quantification analysis of two solar cycle indices. J. Space Weather Space Clim., 7, A5, 2017, DOI: 10.1051/swsc/2017004.
All Figures
Fig. 1.
Time series of the weekly averaged values of SSN2 and F10.7 analysed in our study. 

In the text 
Fig. 2.
(a) RP of the weekly unfiltered SSN2. (b) RP of the weekly unfiltered F10.7. The red box in the RP of the SSN identifies the period associated with the RP of the F10.7. (c) RP of the lowfrequency part of SSN2. (d) RP of the highfrequency part of SSN2. 

In the text 
Fig. 3.
RP of of the weekly unfiltered SSN1 (no embedding). 

In the text 
Fig. 4.
Power spectrum of SSN2 and highpass filter (a). Reconstructed lowfrequency (b) and highfrequency (c) parts of SSN2. 

In the text 
Fig. 5.
EMD decomposition of the SSN2 data sequence. The first seven IMFs (blue box) are used as a representation of the highfrequency part of the signal. 

In the text 
Fig. 6.
EMD reconstruction of the low (a) and highfrequency (b) parts of the SSN2. The highfrequency part of the signal is computed by coadding the first seven IMFs, while the lowfrequency part, not used in the RQA, by adding the remaining ones. 

In the text 
Fig. 7.
Evolution of DET (a, b) and LAM (c, d) obtained from the SSN2 for both filtering strategies (grey dots): FFT (a, c) and EMD (b, d). The continuous line represents a smoothed version of both DET and LAM. The shaded areas highlight the times at which significant mismatches in the evolution of DET and LAM are observed. The orange curve represents a rescaled version of the SSN2 to help the reader identifying the solar cycles. The horizontal blue lines represent the 95% confidence level. 

In the text 
Fig. 8.
(a) Comparison of DET obtained from SSN2 (both filtering strategies) and F10.7 (FFT filtering). (b) Comparison of LAM obtained from SSN2 (both filtering strategies) and F10.7 (FFT filtering). The dotdashed vertical lines mark the position of the solar minima. The different data sequences have been shifted by a constant value for graphical reasons. 

In the text 
Fig. 9.
Power spectrum of the DET obtained from SSN2 with FFT filtering (a), from SSN2 with EMD filtering (b), and from F10.7 with FFT filtering (c). 

In the text 
Fig. 10.
(a) Evolution of DET from SSN1 (black) and DET from SSN2 (red). (b) Relative increase of the determinism of SSN2 with respect to SSN1. 

In the text 
Fig. 11.
JRP between SSN1 and SSN2 data series (no embedding). 

In the text 
Fig. 12.
JRPs of the SSN1 and F10.7 (a), and SSN2 and F10.7 (b). The boxes highlight different epochs in the JRPs where a clear difference between the two versions of SSN are observed (see text for more details). 

In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.