J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 6, 2016
Statistical Challenges in Solar Information Processing
Article Number A2
Number of page(s) 13
Published online 25 January 2016
  • Abramenko, V.I. Multifractal analysis of solar magnetograms. Sol. Phys., 228, 29–42, 2005, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-005-3525-9. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Bloomfield, D.S., P.A. Higgins, R.T.J. McAteer, and P.T. Gallagher. Toward reliable benchmarking of solar flare forecasting methods. Astrophys. J. Lett., 747, L41, 2012, DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/747/2/L41. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Bornmann, P.L., and D. Shaw. Flare rates and the McIntosh active-region classifications. Sol. Phys., 150, 127–146, 1994, DOI: 10.1007/BF00712882. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Borovsky, J.E. Canonical correlation analysis of the combined solar wind and geomagnetic index data sets. J. Geophys. Res. [Space Phys.], 119, 5364–5381, 2014, DOI: 10.1002/2013JA019607. [CrossRef]
  • Bühlmann, P., and S. Van De Geer. Statistics for high-dimensional data: methods, theory and applications. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany, 2011. [CrossRef]
  • Cadavid, A.C., J.K. Lawrence, and A. Ruzmaikin. Principal components and independent component analysis of solar and space data. Sol. Phys., 248, 247–261, 2008, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-007-9026-2. [CrossRef]
  • Carter, K.M., R. Raich, and A.O. Hero. On local intrinsic dimension estimation and its applications. IEEE Trans. Sign. Process., 58 (2), 650–663, 2010. [CrossRef]
  • Colak, T., and R. Qahwaji. Automated Mcintosh-based classification of sunspot groups using MDI images. Sol. Phys., 248, 277–296, 2008, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-007-9094-3. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Colak, T., and R. Qahwaji. Automated solar activity prediction: a hybrid computer platform using machine learning and solar imaging for automated prediction of solar flares. Space Weather, 7, S06001, 2009, DOI: 10.1029/2008SW000401. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Conlon, P.A., P.T. Gallagher, R.T.J. McAteer, J. Ireland, C.A. Young, P. Kestener, R.J. Hewett, and K. Maguire. Multifractal properties of evolving active regions. Sol. Phys., 248, 297–309, 2008, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-007-9074-7. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Conlon, P.A., R.T.J. McAteer, P.T. Gallagher, and L. Fennell. Quantifying the evolving magnetic structure of active regions. Astrophys. J., 722, 577–585, 2010, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/577. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Costa, J.A., and A.O. Hero III. Determining intrinsic dimension and entropy of high-dimensional shape spaces. Statistics and Analysis of Shapes, Springer, 231–252, 2006. [CrossRef]
  • Dobigeon, N., J.-Y. Tourneret, C. Richard, J. Bermudez, S. Mclaughlin, and A.O. Hero. Nonlinear unmixing of hyperspectral images: Models and algorithms. IEEE Signal Process Mag., 31 (1), 82–94, 2014. [CrossRef]
  • Dudok de Wit, T., S. Moussaoui, C. Guennou, F. Auchère, G. Cessateur, M. Kretzschmar, L.A. Vieira, and F.F. Goryaev. Coronal temperature maps from solar EUV images: a blind source separation approach. Sol. Phys., 283, 31–47, 2013, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-012-0142-2. [CrossRef]
  • Dudok de Wit, T., and F. Auchère. Multispectral analysis of solar EUV images: linking temperature to morphology. A&A, 466, 347–355, 2007, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066764. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Efron, B., and R. Tibshirani. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, Florida, 1994.
  • Elad, M., and M. Aharon. Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 15 (12), 3736–3745, 2006, DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2006.881969. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Gallagher, P.T., Y.-J. Moon, and H. Wang. Active-region monitoring and flare forecasting I. Data processing and first results. Sol. Phys., 209, 171–183, 2002, DOI: 10.1023/A:1020950221179. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Georgoulis, M.K. Turbulence in the solar atmosphere: Manifestations and diagnostics via solar image processing. Sol. Phys., 228, 5–27, 2005, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-005-2513-4. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Hale, G.E., F. Ellerman, S.B. Nicholson, and A.H. Joy. The magnetic polarity of sun-spots. Astrophys. J., 49, 153–153, 1919, DOI: 10.1086/142452. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Härdle, W., and L. Simar. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007.
  • Hero, A., and B. Rajaratnam. Large-scale correlation screening. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 106 (496), 1540–1552, 2011. [CrossRef]
  • Hewett, R.J., P.T. Gallagher, R.T.J. McAteer, C.A. Young, J. Ireland, P.A. Conlon, and K. Maguire. Multiscale analysis of active region evolution. Sol. Phys., 248, 311–322, 2008, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-007-9028-0. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Higgins, P.A., P.T. Gallagher, R. McAteer, and D.S. Bloomfield. Solar magnetic feature detection and tracking for space weather monitoring. Adv. Space Res., 47 (12), 2105–2117, 2011. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Holappa, L., K. Mursula, T. Asikainen, and I.G. Richardson. Annual fractions of high-speed streams from principal component analysis of local geomagnetic activity. J. Geophys. Res. [Space Phys.], 119, 4544–4555, 2014, DOI: 10.1002/2014JA019958. [CrossRef]
  • Ireland, J., C.A. Young, R.T.J. McAteer, C. Whelan, R.J. Hewett, and P.T. Gallagher. Multiresolution analysis of active region magnetic structure and its correlation with the mount wilson classification and flaring activity. Sol. Phys., 252, 121–137, 2008, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-008-9233-5. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Jolliffe, I.T. Principal component analysis. 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, 2002.
  • Kestener, P., P.A. Conlon, A. Khalil, L. Fennell, R.T.J. McAteer, P.T. Gallagher, and A. Arneodo. Characterizing complexity in solar magnetogram data using a wavelet-based segmentation method. Astrophys. J., 717, 995–1005, 2010, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/717/2/995. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Kullback, S., and R.A. Leibler. On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Stat., 79–86, 1951. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Lauritzen, S. Graphical models. Clarendon Press, Oxford, ISBN: 9780191591228, 1996.
  • Lawrence, J.K., A. Cadavid, and A. Ruzmaikin. Principal component analysis of the solar magnetic field I: the axisymmetric field at the photosphere. Sol. Phys., 225, 1–19, 2004, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-004-3257-2. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Levina, E., and P.J. Bickel. Maximum likelihood estimation of intrinsic dimension. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 17, 777–784, 2004.
  • Mallat, S., and Z. Zhang. Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 41 (12), 3397–3415, 1993, DOI: 10.1109/78.258082. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Mayfield, E.B., and J.K. Lawrence. The correlation of solar flare production with magnetic energy in active regions. Sol. Phys., 96, 293–305, 1985, DOI: 10.1007/BF00149685. [CrossRef]
  • McAteer, R.T.J., P.T. Gallagher, and P.A. Conlon. Turbulence complexity, and solar flares. Adv. Space Res., 45, 1067–1074, 2010, DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2009.08.026. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • McAteer, R.T.J., P.T. Gallagher, and J. Ireland. Statistics of active region complexity: a large-scale fractal dimension survey. Astrophys. J., 631, 628–635, 2005, DOI: 10.1086/432412. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • McIntosh, P.S. The classification of sunspot groups. Sol. Phys., 125, 251–267, 1990, DOI: 10.1007/BF00158405. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Moon, K.R., V. Delouille, J.J. Li, R. De Visscher, F. Watson, and A.O. HeroIII. Image patch analysis of sunspots and active regions. II. Clustering via matrix factorization. J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2015.
  • Moon, K.R., and A.O. HeroIII. Ensemble estimation of multivariate f-divergence. Ensemble estimation of multivariate f-divergence. In Information Theory (ISIT), 2014 IEEE International Symposium on, IEEE, Honolulu, USA, pp. 356–360, 2014a.
  • Moon, K.R., and A.O. HeroIII. Multivariate f-divergence estimation with confidence. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27, 2420–2428, 2014b.
  • Moon, K.R., J.J. Li, V. Delouille, F. Watson, and A.O. HeroIII. Image patch analysis and clustering of sunspots: A dimensionality reduction approach. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), IEEE, Paris, France, 1623–1627, 2014.
  • Muller, K.E. Understanding canonical correlation through the general linear model and principal components. Am. Stat., 36, 342–354, 1982.
  • Nimon, K., R. Henson, and M. Gates. Revisiting interpretation of canonical correlation analysis: A tutorial and demonstration of canonical commonality analysis. Multivar. Behav. Res., 45, 702–724, 2010. [CrossRef]
  • Phillips, K.J.H. Solar flares – a review. Vistas in Astron., 34, 353–365, 1991, DOI: 10.1016/0083-6656(91)90014-J [CrossRef]
  • Rast, M.P. The scales of granulation, mesogranulation, and supergranulation. Astrophys. J., 597 (2), 1200, 2003. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Rieutord, M., T. Roudier, J. Malherbe, and F. Rincon. On mesogranulation, network formation and supergranulation. A&A, 357, 1063–1072, 2000.
  • Sammis, I., F. Tang, and H. Zirin. The dependence of large flare occurrence on the magnetic structure of sunspots. Astrophys. J., 540, 583–587, 2000, DOI: 10.1086/309303. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Scherrer, P.H., R.S. Bogart, R.I. Bush, J.T. Hoeksema, A.G. Kosovichev, et al. The solar oscillations investigation - Michelson doppler imager. Sol. Phys., 162, 129–188, 1995, DOI: 10.1007/BF00733429. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Stenning, D.C., T.C.M. Lee, D.A. van Dyk, V. Kashyap, J. Sandell, and C.A. Young. Morphological feature extraction for statistical learning with applications to solar image data. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining, 6 (4), 329–345, 2013, DOI: 10.1002/sam.11200 [CrossRef]
  • Tiwari, S.K., M. van Noort, A. Lagg, and S.K. Solanki. Structure of sunspot penumbral filaments: a remarkable uniformity of properties. A&A, 557, A25, 2013. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Watson, F.T., L. Fletcher, and S. Marshall. Evolution of sunspot properties during solar cycle 23. A&A, 533, A14, 2011, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116655. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Zharkova, V.V., S.J. Shepherd, and S.I. Zharkov. Principal component analysis of background and sunspot magnetic field variations during solar cycles 21–23. Monthly Notices of the RAS, 424, 2943–2953, 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21436.x [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.