Open Access
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 7, 2017
Article Number A12
Number of page(s) 11
Published online 05 May 2017
  • Arlt, R. Digitization of sunspot drawings by Staudacher in 1749–1796. Sol. Phys., 247, 399–410, 2008, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-007-9113-4. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Arlt, R. The solar observations at Armagh Observatory in 1795–1797. Astron. Nachr., 330, 311–316, 2009, DOI: 10.1002/asna.200911195. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Arlt, R. The sunspot observations by Samuel Heinrich Schwabe. Astron. Nachr., 332, 805–814, 2011, DOI: 10.1002/asna.201111601. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Beer, J., K.G. McCracken, and R. von Steiger. Cosmogenic radionuclides: theory and applications in the terrestrial and space environments, Springer, Berlin, ISBN: 978-3-642-14650-3, 2012.
  • Carrasco, V.M.S., J.M. Vaquero, M.C. Gallego, and R.M. Trigo. Forty two years counting spots: solar observations by D.E. Hadden during 1890–1931 revisited. New Astron., 25, 95–102, 2013, DOI: 10.1016/j.newast.2013.05.002. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Chatzistergos, T., I.G. Usoskin, G.A. Kovaltsov, N.A. Krivova, and S.K. Solanki. New reconstruction of the sunspot group number since 1739 using the direct calibration and “backbone” methods. A&A, 2017, in press.
  • Clette, F., and L. Lefèvre. The new sunspot number: assembling all corrections. Sol. Phys., 291, 2629–2651, 2016, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-016-1014-y. [CrossRef]
  • Clette, F., L. Svalgaard, J.M. Vaquero, and E.W. Cliver. Revisiting the sunspot number. A 400-year perspective on the solar cycle. Space Sci. Rev., 186, 35–103, 2014, DOI: 10.1007/s11214-014-0074-2. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Clette, F., E.W. Cliver, L. Lefèvre, L. Svalgaard, and J.M. Vaquero. Revision of the sunspot number(s). Space Weather, 13, 529–530, 2015, DOI: 10.1002/2015SW001264. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Clette, F., L. Lefèvre, M. Cagnotti, S. Cortesi, and A. Bulling. The revised Brussels-Locarno sunspot number (1981–2015). Sol. Phys., 291, 2733–2761, 2016, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-016-0875-4. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Cliver, E.W. Comparison of new and old sunspot number time series. Sol. Phys., 291, 2891–2916, 2016, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-016-0929-7. [CrossRef]
  • Cliver, E.W., and A.G. Ling. The discontinuity circa 1885 in the group sunspot number. Sol. Phys., 291, 2763–2784, 2016, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-015-0841-6. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Cliver, E.W., F. Clette, and L. Svalgaard. Recalibrating the Sunspot Number (SSN): the SSN workshops. Cent. Eur. Astrophys. Bull., 37 (2), 401–416, 2013.
  • Cliver, E.W., F. Clette, L. Svalgaard, and J.M. Vaquero. Recalibrating the Sunspot Number (SN): the 3rd and 4th SN workshops. Cent. Eur. Astrophys. Bull., 39, 1–19, 2015.
  • Diercke, A., R. Arlt, and C. Denker. Digitization of sunspot drawings by Spörer made in 1861–1894. Astron. Nachr., 336, 53–62, 2015, DOI: 10.1002/asna.201412138. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Erwin, E.H., H.E. Coffey, W.F. Denig, D.M. Willis, R. Henwood, and M.N. Wild. The Greenwich photo-heliographic results (1874–1976): initial corrections to the printed publications. Sol. Phys., 288, 157–170, 2013, DOI: 10.1007/s11207- 013-0310-z. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Hoyt, D.V., and K.H. Schatten. Group sunspot numbers: a new solar activity reconstruction. Sol. Phys., 179, 189–219, 1998a, DOI: 10.1023/A:1005007527816. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Hoyt, D.V., and K.H. Schatten. Group sunspot numbers: a new solar activity reconstruction. Sol. Phys., 181, 491–512, 1998b, DOI: 10.1023/A:1005056326158. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Hoyt, D.V., K.H. Schatten, and E. Nesmes-Ribes. The one hundredth year of Rudolf Wolf’s death: do we have the correct reconstruction of solar activity? Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2067–2070, 1994, DOI: 10.1029/94GL01698. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Kopecký, M., G.V. Kuklin, and B. Růžičková-Topolova. On the relative inhomogeneity of long-term series of sunspot indices. Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 31, 267–283, 1980.
  • Leussu, R., I.G. Usoskin, R. Arlt, and K. Mursula. Inconsistency of the Wolf sunspot number series around 1848. A&A, 559, A28, 2013, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322373, 4 pp. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Lockwood, M., M.J. Owens, and L. Barnard. Centennial variations in sunspot number, open solar flux, and streamer belt width: 1. Correction of the sunspot number record since 1874. J. Geophys. Res., 119, 5172–5182, 2014a, DOI: 10.1002/2014JA019970. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Lockwood, M., M.J. Owens, and L. Barnard. Centennial variations in sunspot number, open solar flux, and streamer belt width: 2. Comparison with the geomagnetic data. J. Geophys. Res., 119, 5183–5192, 2014b, DOI: 10.1002/2014JA019972. [CrossRef]
  • Lockwood, M., M.J. Owens, L. Barnard, and I.G. Usoskin. Tests of sunspot number sequences: 3. Effects of regression procedures on the calibration of historic sunspot data. Sol. Phys., 291, 2829–2841, 2016a, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-015-0829-2. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Lockwood, M., M.J. Owens, L. Barnard, and I.G. Usoskin. An assessment of sunspot number data composites over 1845–2014. Astrophys. J., 824, 54, 2016b, DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/54, 17 pp. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Muscheler, R., F. Adolphi, K. Herbst, and A. Nilsson. The revised sunspot record in comparison to cosmogenic radionuclide-based solar activity reconstructions. Sol. Phys., 291, 3025–3043, 2016, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-016-0969-z. [CrossRef]
  • Owens, M.J., E. Cliver, K.G. McCracken, J. Beer, L. Barnard, et al. Near-Earth heliospheric magnetic field intensity since 1750: 1. Sunspot and geomagnetic reconstructions. J. Geophys. Res., 121, 6048–6063, 2016, DOI: 10.1002/2016JA022529 [CrossRef]
  • Riley, P., R. Lionello, J.A. Linker, E. Cliver, and A. Balogh, et al. Inferring the structure of the solar corona and inner heliosphere during the maunder minimum using global thermodynamic magnetohydrodynamic simulations. Astrophys. J., 802, 105, 2015, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/105, 14 pp. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Sarychev, A.P. and E.M. Roshchina Comparison of three solar activity indices based on sunspot observations. Solar Sys. Res., 43, 151–157, 2009, DOI: 10.1134/S0038094609020087. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Steinhilber, F., J.A. Abreu, J. Beer, I. Brunner, and M. Christl, et al. 9,400 years of cosmic radiation and solar activity from ice cores and tree rings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109 (16), 5967–5971, 2012, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1118965109. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Solanki, S.K., I.G. Usoskin, B. Kromer, M. Schüssler, and J. Beer. Unusual activity of the Sun during recent decades compared to the previous 11,000 years. Nature, 431, 1084–1087, 2004, DOI: 10.1038/nature02995. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Svalgaard, L. Updating the Historical Sunspot Record. In: S.R., Cranmer, J.T. Hoeksema, and J.L. Kohl, Editors. Understanding a peculiar solar minimum, ASP Conference Series 428. San Francisco: Astron. Society Pacific, pp. 297–305, 2010.
  • Svalgaard, L. How well do we know the sunspot number? In: C.H., Mandrini, and D.F. Webb, Editors. Comparative Magnetic Minima: Characterizing Quiet Times in the Sun and Stars, IAU Symposium, vol. 286, 27–33, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, DOI: 10.1017/S1743921312004590.
  • Svalgaard, L.A. Recount of sunspot groups on Staudach’s drawings. Sol. Phys., 292, 4, 2016, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-016-1023-x, 9 pp. [CrossRef]
  • Svalgaard, L., and K.H. Schatten. Reconstruction of the sunspot group number: the backbone method. Sol. Phys., 291, 2653–2684, 2016, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-015-0815-8. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Svalgaard, L., M. Cagnotti, and S. Cortesi. The effect of sunspot weighting, Sol. Phys., 292, 34, 2017, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-016-1024-9, 19 pp. [CrossRef]
  • Usoskin, I.G. A history of solar activity over millenia. Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 10, 1, 2013, DOI: 10.12942/lrsp-2013-1. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Usoskin, I.G., S.K. Solanki, and G.A. Kovaltsov. Grand minima and maxima of solar activity: new observational constraints. A&A, 471, 301–309, 2007, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077704. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Usoskin, I.G., R. Arlt, E. Asvestar, E. Hawkins, and M. Käpylä, et al. The Maunder minimum (1645–1715) was indeed a grand minimum: a reassessment of multiple datasets. A&A, 581, A95, 2015, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526652, 19 pp. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Usoskin, I.G., G.A. Kovaltsov, M. Lockwood, K. Mursula, M. Owens, and S.K. Solanki. A new calibrated sunspot group series since 1749: statistics of active day fractions. Sol. Phys., 291, 2685–2708, 2016a, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-015-0838-1. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Usoskin, I.G., G.A. Kovaltsov, and T. Chatzistergos. Dependence of the Sunspot-group size on the level of solar activity and its influence on the calibration of solar observers. Sol. Phys., 291, 3793–3805, 2016b, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-016-0993-z. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Vaquero, J.M. Historical sunspot observations: a review. Adv. Space Res., 40, 929–9411, 2007, DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2007.01.087. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Vaquero, J.M., and M.C. Gallego. Reconstructing past solar activity using meridian solar observations: the case of the Royal Observatory of the Spanish Navy (1833–1840). Adv. Space Res., 53, 1162–1168, 2014, DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2014.01.015. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Vaquero, J.M., M.C. Gallego, I.G. Usoskin, and G.A. Kovaltsov.Revisited Sunspot data: a new scenario for the onset of the maunder minimum. Astrophys. J., 731, L24, 2011, DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/731/2/L24, 4 pp. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Vaquero, J.M., R.M. Trigo, M.C. Gallego, and F. Dominguez-Castro. Improving sunspot records: solar drawings of the late 19th Century from the Royal Astronomical Observatory of Lisbon. Observatory, 132, 376–384, 2012.
  • Vaquero, J.M., L. Svalgaard, V.M.S. Carrasco, F. Clette, L. Lefèvre, M.C. Gallego, R. Arlt, A.J.P. Aparicio, J.-G. Richard, and R.A. Howe. Revised collection of sunspot group numbers. Sol. Phys., 291, 3061–3074, 2016, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-016-0982-2. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Waldmeier, M. Chromosphärische Eruptionen. I. Zeitschrift für Astrophysik, 16, 276–290, 1938, ADS:
  • Willis, D.M., H.E. Coffey, R. Henwood, E.H. Erwin, D.V. Hoyt, M.N. Wild, and W.F. Denig. The Greenwich photo-heliographic results (1874–1976): summary of the observations, applications, datasets, definitions and errors. Sol. Phys., 288, 117–139, 2013a, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-013-0311-y. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Willis, D.M., R. Henwood, M.N. Wild, H.E. Coffey, W.F. Denig, E.H. Erwin, and D.V. Hoyt. The Greenwich photo-heliographic results (1874–1976): procedures for checking and correcting the sunspot digital datasets. Sol. Phys., 288, 141–156, 2013b, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-013-0312-x. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Willis, D.M., M.N. Wild, and J.S. Warburton. Re-examination of the daily number of sunspot groups for the royal observatory, Greenwich (1874–1885). Sol. Phys., 291, 2519–2552, 2016a, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-016-0856-7. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Willis, D.M., M.N. Wild, G.M. Appleby, and L.T. Macdonald. The Greenwich photo-heliographic results (1874–1885): observing telescopes, photographic processes and solar images. Sol. Phys., 291, 2553–2586, 2016b, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-016-0894-1. [CrossRef]
  • Wolf, R. Sonnenflecken Beobachtungen in der zweiten Hälfte des Jahres 1850. Mitt. Nat. Forsch. Ges. Bern, 207, 89–95, 1851.
  • Wolf, R. Beobachtungen der Sonnenflecken in den Jahren 1849–1855. Astron. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw. Zürich, 1, 3–13, 1856.
  • Wolf, R. Beobachtungen über die Sonnenflecken im Jahre 1856. Astron. Mitt. Zürich, 3, 31, 1857.
  • Wolfer, A. Beobachtungen der Sonnenflecken im Jahre 1894. Astron. Mitt. Zürich, 86, 190, 1895.
  • Zolotova, N.V., and D.I. Ponyavin. The Maunder minimum is not as grand as it seemed to be. Astrophys. J., 800, 14, 2015, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/42, 14 pp. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.