Open Access
| Issue |
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 7, 2017
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A20 | |
| Number of page(s) | 16 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017018 | |
| Published online | 24 August 2017 | |
- Agresti, A., and B.A. Coull. Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions. Amer. Stat., 52, 1, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Bloomfield, D.S., P.A. Higgins, R.T. James McAteer, and P. Gallagher. Toward reliable benchmarking of solar flare forecasting methods. Astrophys. J., 747, L41, 2012, DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/747/L41. [Google Scholar]
- Crown, M.D. Validation of the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center’s solar flare forecasting look-up table and forecaster-issued probabilities. Space Weather, 10, S06006, 2012, DOI: 10.1029/2011SW000760. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Démoulin, P., C.H. Mandrini, L. van Driel-Gesztelyi, B.J. Thompson, S. Plunkett, Z. Kövári, G. Aulanier, and A. Young. What is the source of the magnetic helicity shed by CMEs? The long-term helicity budget of AR 7978. A&A, 382, 650, 2002. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011634. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Devos, A., C. Verbeeck, and E. Robbrecht. Verification of space weather forecasting at the Regional Warning Center in Belgium. J. Space Weather Space Clim., 4, A29, 2014, DOI: 10.1051/swsc/2014025. [Google Scholar]
- DiCiccio, T.J., and B. Efron. Bootstrap confidence intervals. Stat. Sci., 11, 189, 1996. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Efron, B., and R.J. Tibshirani. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1993. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ferro, C.A.T., and D.B. Stephenson. Extremal dependence indices: improved verification measures for deterministic forecasts of rare binary events. Wea. Forecasting, 26, 699, 2011, DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-10-05030.1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Finley, J.P.. Tornado predictions. Amer. Meteor. J., 1, 85, 1884. [Google Scholar]
- Gandin, L.S., and A.H. Murphy. Equitable skill score for categorical forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 361, 1992. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gerrity, J.P. A note on Gandin and Murphy’s equitable skill score. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 2709, 1992. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Green, L.M., M.C. López Fuentes, C.H. Mandrini, P. Démoulin, L. van Driel-Gesztelyi, and J.L. Culhane. The magnetic helicity budget of a CME-prolific active region. Sol. Phys., 208, 43, 2002. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hamill, T.M., and J. Juras. Measuring forecast skill: is it real skill or is it the varying climatology? Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 132, 2905, 2006. DOI: 10.1256/qj.06.25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jolliffe, I.T. Uncertainty and inference for verification measures. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 637, 2007, DOI: 10.1175/WAF989.1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jolliffe, I.T., and D.B. Stephenson. Forecast verification: a practitioner’s guide in atmospheric science. 1st edn., John Wiley and Sons Ltd, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Kubo, Y. Statistical models for the solar flare interval distribution in individual active regions. Sol. Phys., 248, 85, 2008, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-008-9135-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- McCloskey, A.E., P.T. Gallagher, and D.S. Bloomfield. Flaring rates and the evolution of sunspot group mcintosh classifications. Sol. Phys., 291, 1711, 2016, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-016-0933-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy, A.H. Forecast verification: its complexity and dimensionality. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119, 1590, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Murphy, A.H. The Finley affair: a signal event in the history of forecast verification. Wea. Forecasting, 11, 3, 1996. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy, A.H., and R.L. Winkler. A general framework for forecast verification. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 1330, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Stephenson, D.B. Use of the “odds ratio” for diagnosing forecast skill. Wea. Forecasting, 15, 221, 2000. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Stephenson, D.B., B. Casati, C.A.T. Ferro, and C.A. Wilson. The extreme dependency score: a non-vanishing measure for forecast of rare events. Meteorol. Appl., 15, 41, 2008, DOI: 10.1002/met.53. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Wilks, D.S. Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. 2nd edn., Elsevier, Oxford, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, E.B. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 22, 209, 1927. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- WMO. Recommendation for the Verification and Intercomparison of QPFs and PQPFs from Operational NWP Models, WWRP 2009-1. 2009, available at https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/wwrp/new/documents/WWRP2009-1_web_CD.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- WMO. Verification Methods for Tropical Cyclone Forecasts, WWRP 2013-7. 2014, available at https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/wwrp/new/documents/WWRP_2013_7_TC_verification_15_Nov_en.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.