Open Access
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 9, 2019
Article Number A11
Number of page(s) 9
Section Agora
Published online 07 May 2019
  • Airy GB, Glaisher J, Nash WC. 1874. Results of the magnetical and meteorological observations made at the royal observatory, greenwich, 1872. Royal Observatory, Greenwich, UK. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  • Akasofu S-I, Chapman S. 1964. On the asymmetric development of magnetic storm field in low and middle latitudes. Planet Space Sci 12(6): 607–626. DOI: 10.1016/0032-0633(64)90008-X. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carrington RC. 1860. Description of a singular appearance seen in the Sun on September 1, 1859. Mon Not Roy Astron Soc 20: 13–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chapman S. 1953. Polar and tropical auroræ: And the isoauroral diagram. Proc Indian Acad Sci 37(2): 175–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cid C, Saiz E, Guerrero A, Palacios J, Cerrato Y. 2015. A Carrington-like geomagnetic storm observed in the 21st century. J Space Weather Space Clim 5: A16, 1–6. DOI: 10.1051/swsc/2015017. [Google Scholar]
  • Garland GD. 1979. The contributions of Carl Friedrich Gauss to geomagnetism. Hist Math 6(1): 5–29. DOI: 10.1016/0315-0860(79)90100-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gauss CF. 1838. Bemerkungen über die Einrichtung und den Gebrauch des Bifilar-Magnetometers. In: Resultate aus den Beobachtungen des Magnetischen Vereins im Jahre 1837. Gauss CF, Weber W (Eds.), Verlage der Dieterichschen Buchhandlung, Göttingen, pp. 20–37. [Google Scholar]
  • Green JL, Boardsen S. 2006. Duration and extent of the great auroral storm of 1859. Adv Space Res 38(2): 130–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2005.08.054. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hayakawa H, Ebihara Y, Willis DM, Hattori K, Giunta AS, Wild MN, Hayakawa S, Toriumi S, Mitsuma Y, MacDonald LT, Shibata K, Silverman SM. 2018. The great space weather event during 1872 February recorded in East Asia. Astrophys J 862: 1. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaca40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hodgson R. 1860. On a curious appearance seen in the Sun. Mon Not Roy Astron Soc 20: 15. [Google Scholar]
  • Keika K, Ebihara Y, Kataoka R. 2015. What caused the rapid recovery of the Carrington storm? Earth Planets Space 61(1): art. no. 65. DOI: 10.1186/s40623-015-0234-y. [Google Scholar]
  • Kreil K, Jelinek K. 1850. Magnetische und meteorologische Beobachtungen zu Prag [Magnetic and meteorological observations in Prague]. Druck der k. k. Hofbuchdruckerei von Gottlieb Haase Söhne, Prag (Prague), Czech Republic. (In German). [Google Scholar]
  • Montbriand LE. 1970. A simple method for calculating the local time of corrected geomagnetic midnight. J Geophys Res Space Phys 75(28): 5634–5636. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moss NAF. 1910. Magnetic observations made at the Government Observatory, Bombay, for the period 1846 to 1905 and their discussion, Part II. The Phenomenon and its Discussion. Bombay Government Central Press, Bombay (present-day Mumbai), Maharashtra. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  • Moreno Cárdenas F, Cristancho Sánchez S, Vargas Domínguez S. 2016. The grand aurorae borealis seen in Colombia in 1859. Adv Space Res 57(1): 257–267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nevanlinna H. 1997. Gauss’ H-variometer at the Helsinki Magnetic Observatory 1844–1912. J Geomag Geoelectr 49: 1209–1215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Odenwald S. 2015. Solar storms: 2000 years of human calamity! CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, San Bernardino, CA, USA. ISBN-10: 1505941466, ISBN-13: 978-1505941463. [Google Scholar]
  • Shi Y, Zesta E, Lyons LR. 2008. Modeling magnetospheric current response to solar wind dynamic pressure enhancements during magnetic storms: 1. Methodology and results of the 25 September 1998 peak main phase case. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 113(10): A10218, 1–13. DOI: 10.1029/2008JA013111. [Google Scholar]
  • Silverman SM. 2008. Low-latitude auroras: The great aurora of 4 February 1872. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 70(10): 1301–1308. DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2008.03.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tanskanen EI, Pulkkinen TI, Koskinen HEJ, Slavin JA. 2002. Substorm energy budget during low and high solar activity: 1997 and 1999 compared. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 107(A6). DOI: 10.1029/2001JA900153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tanskanen EI, Slavin JA, Fairfield DH, Sibeck DG, Gjerloev J, Mukai T, Ieda A, Nagai T. 2005. Magnetotail response to prolonged southward IMF bz intervals: Loading, unloading, and continuous magnetospheric dissipation. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 110(A3). DOI: 10.1029/2004JA010561. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tsyganenko NA, Sitnov MI. 2005. Modeling the dynamics of the inner magnetosphere during strong geomagnetic storms. J Geophys Res 110: A03208. DOI: 10.1029/2004JA010798. [Google Scholar]
  • Tsurutani BT, Gonzalez WD, Lakhina GS, Alex S. 2003. The extreme magnetic storm of 1–2 September 1859. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 108(A7): art. no. 1268. DOI: 10.1029/2002JA009504. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Baak DA. 2013. Re-creating Gauss’s method for non-electrical absolute measurements of magnetic fields and moments. Am J Phys 81(10): 738–744. DOI: 10.1119/1.4816806. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.