Open Access
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 9, 2019
Article Number A14
Number of page(s) 17
Published online 08 May 2019
  • Agostinelli S, Allison J, Amako KA, Apostolakis J, Araujo H, et al. 2003. GEANT4 – a simulation toolkit. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, A Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip 506 ( 3 ): 250–303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alexeev V, Bagulya A, Chernyavsky M, Gippius A, Goncharova L, et al. 2016. Charge spectrum of heavy and superheavy components of galactic cosmic rays: Results of the olimpiya experiment. Astrophys J 829 ( 2 ): 120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis J, Arce P, Asai M, et al. 2016. Recent developments in Geant4. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, A Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip 835 : 186–225. [Google Scholar]
  • Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis JEA, Araujo H, Dubois PA, et al. 2006. Geant4 developments and applications. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 53 ( 1 ): 270–278. [Google Scholar]
  • Banjac S, Herbst K, Heber B. 2019. The Atmospheric Radiation Interaction Simulator (AtRIS) – Description and validation. J Geophys Res (Space Phys) 124 ( 1 ): 50–67. DOI: 10.1029/2018JA026042. [Google Scholar]
  • Beaujean R, Kopp J, Burmeister S, Petersen F, Reitz G. 2002. Dosimetry inside MIR station using a silicon detector telescope (DOSTEL). Radiat Meas 35 ( 5 ): 433–438. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Benton E, Benton E, Frank A. 2010. Conversion between different forms of LET. Radiat Meas 45 ( 8 ): 957–959. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berger M, Inokuti M, Anderson H, Bichsel H, Dennis J, Powers D, Seltzer S, Turner J. 1984. Report 37. J Int Comm Radiat Units Meas ( 2 ). [Google Scholar]
  • Dartnell LR, Nordheim TA, Patel MR, Mason JP, Coates AJ, Jones GH. 2015. Constraints on a potential aerial biosphere on Venus: I Cosmic rays. Icarus 257 : 396–405. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dietze G, Bartlett D, Cool D, Cucinotta F, Jia X, et al. 2013. Icrp publication 123: Assessment of radiation exposure of astronauts in space. Ann ICRP 42 ( 4 ): 1–339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gieseler J, Heber B, Herbst K. 2017. An empirical modification of the force field approach to describe the modulation of galactic cosmic rays close to Earth in a broad range of rigidities. J Geophys Res (Space Phys) 122 ( 11 ): 10,964–10,979. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 60. 1991. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 21(1–3): 1–201. [Google Scholar]
  • Ivanchenko V, Apostolakis J, Bagulya A, Abdelouahed H, Black R, et al. 2010. Recent improvements in Geant4 electromagnetic physics models and interfaces. In: 3th Monte Carlo Conference MC2010 vol. 2 : 898–903. [Google Scholar]
  • Mazur J, Crain W, Looper M, Mabry D, Blake J, Case A, Golightly M, Kasper J, Spence HE. 2011. New measurements of total ionizing dose in the lunar environment. Space Weather 9 ( 7 ). [Google Scholar]
  • Mazur JE, Zeitlin C, Schwadron N, Looper MD, Townsend LW, Blake JB, Spence H. 2013. Update on radiation dose from galactic and solar protons at the moon using the LRO/CRaTER microdosimeter. Space Weather 13 ( 6 ): 363–364. DOI: 10.1002/2015SW001175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McNair A. 1980. ICRU report 33 – Radiation Quantities and Units Pub: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Washington D.C. USA issued 15 April 1980, pp.25. J Labelled Compd Radiopharm 18 ( 9 ): 1398–1398. DOI: 10.1002/jlcr.2580180918. [Google Scholar]
  • Mrigakshi AI. 2013. Galactic cosmic ray exposure of humans in space – Influence of galactic cosmic ray models and shielding on dose calculations for low-Earth orbit and near-Earth interplanetary space. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kiel, Germany. URL [Google Scholar]
  • Nordheim T, Dartnell L, Desorgher L, Coates AJ, Jones GH. 2015. Ionization of the Venusian atmosphere from solar and galactic cosmic rays. Icarus 245 : 80–86. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O’Neill PM. 2010a. Badhwar–O’Neill 2010 galactic cosmic ray flux model – revised. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 6 ( 57 ): 3148–3153. [Google Scholar]
  • O’Neill PM. 2010b. Badhwar–O’Neill 2010 galactic cosmic ray flux model–Revised. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 57 ( 6 ): 3148–3153. [Google Scholar]
  • Reitz G, Berger T. 2006. The MATROSHKA facility–Dose determination during an EVA. Radiat Protect Dosim 120(1–4): 442–445. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reitz G, Berger T, Bilski P, Facius R, Hajek M, et al. 2009. Astronaut’s organ doses inferred from measurements in a human phantom outside the International Space Station. Radiat Res 171 ( 2 ): 225–235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Simpson JA. 1983. Elemental and isotopic composition of the galactic cosmic rays. Annu Rev Nucl Part Sci 33 : 323–382. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ns.33.120183.001543. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Spence HE, Case A, Golightly M, Heine T, Larsen B, et al. 2010. CRaTER: The cosmic ray telescope for the effects of radiation experiment on the lunar reconnaissance orbiter mission. Space Sci Rev 150(1–4): 243–284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sullivan J. 1971. Geometric factor and directional response of single and multi-element particle telescopes. Nucl Instrum Methods 95 ( 1 ): 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Tanabashi M, Hagiwara K, Hikasa K, Nakamura K, Sumino Y, et al., (Particle Data Group). 2018a. Review of particle physics. Phys Rev D 98 : 030,001. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001. [Google Scholar]
  • Tanabashi M, Richardson P, Bettini A, Vogt A, Garren L, et al. 2018b. APS: Review of particle physics. Phys Rev D 98 : 030,001. [Google Scholar]
  • Usoskin IG, Bazilevskaya GA, Kovaltsov GA. 2011. Solar modulation parameter for cosmic rays since 1936 reconstructed from ground-based neutron monitors and ionization chambers. J Geophys Res (Space Phys) 116 : A02104. DOI: 10.1029/2010JA016105. [Google Scholar]
  • Zeitlin C, Hassler D, Cucinotta F, Ehresmann B, Wimmer-Schweingruber R, et al. 2013. Measurements of energetic particle radiation in transit to Mars on the Mars Science Laboratory. Science 340 ( 6136 ): 1080–1084. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.