The Virtual Space Weather Modelling Centre | Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate

Open Access

Issue		J. Space Weather Space Clim. Volume 10, 2020


Article Number		14
Number of page(s)		23
Section		Agora
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020012
Published online		17 April 2020

Abel B, Thorne RM. 1998. Electron scattering loss in Earth's inner magnetosphere: 1. Dominant physical processes. JGR Space Phys. 103(A2): 2385–2396. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JA02919. [Google Scholar]
Amari T, Boulmezaoud TZ, Aly JJ. 2006. Well posed reconstruction of the solar coronal magnetic field. A&A 446: 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20054076. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Eastwood JP, Biffis E, Hapgood MA, Green L, Bisi MM, Bentley RD, Wicks R, McKinnell L-A, Gibbs M, Burnett C. 2017. The economic impact of space weather: Where do we stand? Risk Anal. 37(2): 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12765. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
ESA SSA Team. 2011. Space situational awareness – space weather customer requirements document (CRD). SSA-SWE-RS-CRD-1001, issue 4.5a, 28/07/2011. Available from: http://swe.ssa.esa.int/documents. [Google Scholar]
Fuller-Rowell TJ, Rees D. 1980. A three-dimensional time-dependent global model of the thermosphere. J Atmos Sci 37: 2545–2567. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<2545:ATDTDG>2.0.CO;2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Glauert S, Horne R, Meredith N. 2014. Three dimensional electron radiation belt simulations using the BAS Radiation Belt Model with new diffusion models for chorus, plasmaspheric hiss and lightning-generated whistlers. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 119: 268–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Harvey JW, Hill F, Hubbard RP, Kennedy JR, Leibacher JW, et al. 1996. The Global Oscillation Network Group (GONG) project. Science 272(5266): 1284–1286. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5266.1284. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hosteaux S, Chané E, Decraemer B, Tălpeanu D, Poedts S. 2018. Ultra-high resolution model of a breakout CME embedded in the solar wind. A&A 620: A57. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832976. [Google Scholar]
Hosteaux S, Chané E, Poedts S. 2019. On the effect of the solar wind density on the evolution of normal and inverse Coronal Mass Ejections. A&A 632: A89. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935894. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Janhunen P, Palmroth M, Laitinen T, Honkonen I, Juusola L, Facskó G, Pulkkinen T. 2012. The GUMICS-4 global MHD magnetosphere–ionosphere coupling simulation. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 80: 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2012.03.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lakka A, Pulkkinen TI, Dimmock AP, Kilpua E, Ala-Lahti M, Honkonen I, Palmroth M, Raukunen O. 2019. GUMICS-4 analysis of interplanetary coronal mass ejection impact on Earth during low and typical Mach number solar winds. Ann Geophys 37: 561–579. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-561-2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lani A, Villedieu N, Bensassi K, Kapa L, Vymazal M, Yalim MS, Panesi M. 2013. COOLFluiD: An open computational platform for multi-physics simulation. In: Proc. 21st AIAA CFD Conference, AIAA 2013-2589, San Diego, June 2013. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-2589. [Google Scholar]
Millward GH, Moffett RJ, Quegan S, Fuller-Rowell TJ. 1996. A coupled thermosphere ionosphere plasmasphere Model (CTIP). In: STEP handbook on ionospheric models, Schunk RW (Eds.), Utah State Univ, Logan, pp. 239–279. [Google Scholar]
Newell PT, Sotirelis T, Liou K, Rich FJ. 2008. Pairs of solar wind-magnetosphere coupling functions: Combining a merging term with a viscous term works best. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 113: A04218. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012825. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
O’Brien TP, McPherron RL. 2000. An empirical phase space analysis of ring current dynamics: Solar wind control of injection and decay. J Geophys Res 105: 7707–7720. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JA000437. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pomoell J, Poedts S. 2018. EUHFORIA: EUropean Heliospheric FORecasting Information Asset. J Space Weather Space Clim 8: A35. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2018020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Scolini C, Verbeke C, Poedts S, Chané E, Pomoell J, Zuccarello FP. 2018. Effect of the initial shape of Coronal Mass Ejections on 3D MHD simulations and geoeffectiveness predictions. Space Weather 16: 754–771. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001806. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Taktakishvili A, Kuznetsova M, MacNeice P, Hesse M, Rastätter L, Pulkkinen A, Chulaki A, Odstrcil D. 2009. Validation of the coronal mass ejection predictions at the Earth orbit estimated by ENLIL heliosphere cone model. Space Weather 7: S03004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008SW000448. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Tóth G, Sokolov IV, Gombosi TI, Chesney DR, Clauer CR, De Zeeuw DL, Hansen KC, Kane KJ, Manchester WB, Oehmke RC, Powell KG, Ridley AJ, Roussev II, Stout QF, Volberg O, Wolf RA, Sazykin S, Chan A, Yu B, Kóta J. 2005. Space weather modeling framework: A new tool for the space science community. J Geophys Res 110: A12226. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Xia C, Teunissen J, El Mellah I, Chané E, Keppens R. 2018. MPI-AMRVAC 2.0 for solar and astrophysical applications. ApJ Suppl 234: 30 (26 p). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aaa6c8. [Google Scholar]
Yalim MS, Poedts S. 2014. 3D Global Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of the Solar Wind/Earth’s Magnetosphere Interaction. In: “Numerical modeling of space plasma flows, ASTRONUM-2013”, Proc. 8th International Conference on Numerical Modeling of Space Plasma Flows (Astronum 2013), July 1–5, 2013, Biarritz, France, Pogorelov NV, Audit E., Zank GP (Eds.), ASP Conference Series, 488, pp. 192–197. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.