Open Access
Issue |
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 11, 2021
Topical Issue - 10 years of JSWSC
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 27 | |
Number of page(s) | 5 | |
Section | Agora | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2021008 | |
Published online | 31 March 2021 |
- Dunlop MW, Taylor MGG, Davis JA, Pu ZY, Fazakeley AN, et al. 2005. Comparative Cluster/Double Star observations of the high and low latitude dayside magnetopause. Ann Geophys 2867–2875. https://doi.org/10.1.1.694.8654. [Google Scholar]
- Escoubet CP, Fehringer M, Goldstein M. 2001. The Cluster Mission. Ann Geophys 19: 1197–1200. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-19-1197-2001. [Google Scholar]
- Gan WQ, Geng YY, Li H, Wu J, Zhang HY, et al. 2015. ASO-S: Advanced Space-based Solar Observatory. Proc SPIE – Int Soc Opt Eng 9604: 96040T. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2189062. [Google Scholar]
- Haerendel G, Torbert RB, Höfner H. 1999. The Equator-S Mission. Ann Geophys 17: 1499–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-999-1499-x. [Google Scholar]
- Liu ZX, Escoubet P, Cao JB. 2005. A Chinese-European Multiscale Mission: The Double Star Program. Multiscale Coupling of Sun-Earth Processes, pp. 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451881-1/50037-X. [Google Scholar]
- Lu L, McKenna-Lawlor S, Barabash S. 2007. Plasma sheet stretching accompanied by field aligned energetic ion fluxes observed by the NUADU instrument aboard TC-2. Chin Sci Bull 52: 1719–1723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0238-5. [Google Scholar]
- Millan RM, Steiger VR, Ariel M, Bartalev S, Borgeaud M, et al. 2019. Small satellites for space science A COSPAR scientific roadmap. Adv Space Res 64: 1466–1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.07.035. [Google Scholar]
- Ping JS, Qian ZH, Hong XY, Zheng WM, Fung LW, et al. 2010. Brief introduction about Chinese Martian Mission Yinghuo-1. In: 41st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1060 p. [Google Scholar]
- Pu ZY, Xiao CJ, Zhang XG, Huang ZY, Fu SY, et al. 2005. Double Star TC-1 observations of component reconnection at the dayside magnetopause: A preliminary study. Ann Geophys 23: 2889–2895. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-2889-2005. [Google Scholar]
- Ratovsky KG, Shi JK, Oinats AV. 2014a. Comparative study of high-latitude, mid-latitude and low-latitude ionosphere on basis of local empirical models. Adv Space Res 54: 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.02.019. [Google Scholar]
- Ratovsky KG, Shi JK, Oinats AV. 2014b. Comparison of diurnal, seasonal and solar cycle variations of high-latitude, mid-latitude and low-latitude ionosphere. Chin J Space Sci 34: 143–153. https://doi.org/10.11728/cjss.2014.02.143. [Google Scholar]
- Romanova EB, Zherebtsov GA, Ratovsky KG. 2013. Response of the ionospheric F2-region over Irkutsk and Hainan to strong geomagnetic storms. Chin J Space Sci 33: 494–500. https://doi.org/10.11728/cjss2013.05.494. [Google Scholar]
- Shi JK, Wang GJ, Reinisch BW. 2011. The relationship between strong range spread F and ionospheric scintillations observed in Hainan from 2003 to 2007. J Geophys Res 116: A08306. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016806. [Google Scholar]
- Shi JK, Wang Z, Tao W. 2014. Investigation of total absorption of radio waves in high latitude ionosphere. Plasma Sci Technol 16: 833–836. https://doi.org/10.1088/1009-0630/16/9/05. [Google Scholar]
- Takada T, Nakamura R, Juusola L, Amm O, Baumjohann W, et al. 2008. Local field-aligned currents in the magnetotail and ionosphere as observed by a Cluster, Double Star, and MIRACLE conjunction. J Geophys Res 113: A07S20. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012759. [Google Scholar]
- Wang C, Branduardi-Raymont G. 2020. Update on the ESA-CAS Joint Solar Wind Magnetosphere Ionosphere Link Explorer (SMILE) Mission. Chin J Space Sci 40: 700–703. https://doi.org/10.11728/cjss2020.05.700. [Google Scholar]
- Wang GJ, Shi JK, Wang X. 2010. The statistical properties of spread F observed at Hainan station during the declining period of the 23rd solar cycle. Ann Geophys 28: 1263–1271. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-28-1263-2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wang GJ, Shi JK, Wang Z. 2017a. Solar cycle variation of ionospheric parameters over the low latitude station Hainan, China, during 2002–2012 and its comparison with IRI -2012 model. Adv Space Res 60: 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.12.013. [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z, Shi JK, Wang GJ. 2017b. Diurnal, seasonal, annual, and semi-annual variations of ionospheric parameters at different latitudes in East Asian sector during ascending phase of solar activity. Sol-Terr Phys 3: 43–50. https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-3220177. [Google Scholar]
- Wu J, Zhu GW, Zhao H. 2010. Scientific objectives of China-Russia Joint Mars exploration program YH-1. Chin Astron Astrophys 34: 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chinastron.2010.04.009. [Google Scholar]
- Yao L, Liu SL, Jin SP. 2005. A study of orientation and motion of flux transfer events observed on the high-latitude dayside magnetopause. Chin J Geophys 48: 1217–1225. [Google Scholar]
- Yao L, Liu SL, Liu K. 2007. Joint Study on Transfer Events Using the Data Observed by TC-1 and Cluster Near Dayside Magetospause. Chin J Space Sci 27: 13–18. https://doi.org/10.11728/cjss2007.01.013. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang LQ, Liu ZX, Ma ZW. 2010. X Line distribution determined from Earthward and tailward convective bursty flows in the central plasma sheet. J Geophys Res 115: A06218. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014429. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang HZ, Pu ZY, Cao X, Fu SY, Liu ZX, et al. 2007. TC-1 observations of flux pileup and dipolarization-associated expansion in the near-Earth magnetotail during substorms. Geophys Res Lett 34: L03104. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028326s. [Google Scholar]
- Zong QG, Zhou XZ, Li X, Song P, Fu SY, et al. 2007. Ultralow frequency modulation of energetic particles in the dayside magnetosphere. Geophys Res Lett 34: L12105. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029915. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.