Assessing VBz variations during CME propagation: a preparatory study for the HENON mission using EUHFORIA | Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate

Open Access

Issue		J. Space Weather Space Clim. Volume 16, 2026


Article Number		14
Number of page(s)		20
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2026013
Published online		07 May 2026

Acuña MH, Ogilvie KW, Baker DN, Curtis SA, Fairfield DH, et al. 1995. The global geospace science program and its investigations. Space Sci Rev 71(1–4): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751323. [Google Scholar]
Altschuler MD, Newkirk G. 1969. Magnetic fields and the structure of the solar corona. I: Methods of calculating coronal fields. Sol Phys 9(1): 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145734. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Antonucci E, Romoli M, Andretta V, Fineschi S, Heinzel P, et al. 2020. Metis: the Solar Orbiter visible light and ultraviolet coronal imager. Astron Astrophys 642: A10. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935338. [Google Scholar]
Arge CN, Odstrcil D, Pizzo VJ, Mayer LR. 2003. Improved method for specifying solar wind speed near the Sun. In: Solar Wind Ten. American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Velli M, Bruno R, Malara F, Bucci B (Eds.), AIP, Vol. 679, pp. 190–193. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1618574. [Google Scholar]
Borovsky JE, Birn J. 2014. The solar wind electric field does not control the dayside reconnection rate. J Geophys Res (Space Phys) 119(2): 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019193. [Google Scholar]
Brueckner G, Howard R, Koomen M, Korendyke C, Michels D, et al. 1995. The large angle spectroscopic coronagraph (LASCO) visible light coronal imaging and spectroscopy. Sol Phys 162(1): 357–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733434. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bruno R, Carbone V. 2013. The solar wind as a turbulence laboratory. Liv Rev Sol Phys 10(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2013-2. [Google Scholar]
Chandrasekhar S, Kendall PC. 1957. On force-free magnetic fields. Astrophys J 126: 457. https://doi.org/10.1086/146413. [Google Scholar]
Cicalò S, Alessi EM, Provinciali L, Amabili P, Saita G, et al. 2025. Mission analysis for the HENON CubeSat mission to a large Sun-Earth distant retrograde orbit. Astrophys Space Sci 370(8): 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-025-04473-0. [Google Scholar]
Cuesta ME, Chhiber R, Roy S, Goodwill J, Pecora F, et al. 2022. Isotropization and evolution of energy-containing eddies in solar wind turbulence: Parker solar probe, helios 1, ace, wind, and voyager 1. Astrophys J Lett 932(1): L11. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac73fd. [Google Scholar]
Davies EE, Forsyth RJ, Winslow RM, Möstl C, Lugaz N. 2021. A catalog of interplanetary coronal mass ejections observed by Juno between 1 and 5.4 au. Astrophys J 923(2): 136. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac2ccb. [Google Scholar]
DeForest CE, Gibson SE, Killough R, Waltham NR, Beasley MN, et al. 2026. Polarimeter to Unify the Corona and Heliosphere (PUNCH). Sol Phys 301(1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-026-02608-2. [Google Scholar]
Domingo V, Fleck B, Poland AI. 1995. The SOHO mission: an overview. Sol Phys 162(1–2): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Eastwood JP, Brown P, Magnes W, Carr CM, Agu M, et al. 2024. The vigil magnetometer for operational Space Weather services from the Sun-Earth L5 point. Space Weather 22(6): e2024SW003867. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW003867. [Google Scholar]
Echer E, Gonzalez W, Guarnieri F, Dal Lago A, Vieira L. 2005. Introduction to space weather. Adv Space Res 35(5): 855–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.098. [Google Scholar]
Fox NJ, Velli MC, Bale SD, Decker R, Driesman A, et al. 2016. The solar probe plus mission: humanity’s first visit to our star. Space Sci Rev 204(1–4): 7–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0211-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Fry EK. 2012. The risks and impacts of space weather: policy recommendations and initiatives. Space Policy 28(3): 180–184. Highlight: Assuring the sustainability of space activities. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265964612000616. [Google Scholar]
Gonzalez WD, Tsurutani, BT. 1987. Criteria of interplanetary parameters causing intense magnetic storms (Dst < −100 nT). Planet Space Sci 35(9): 1101–1109. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0032063387900158. [Google Scholar]
Gonzalez WD, Tsurutani BT, Gonzalez ALC, Smith EJ, Tang F, et al. 1989. Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling during intense magnetic storms (1978–1979). J Geophys Res 94(A7): 8835–8851. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA094iA07p08835. [Google Scholar]
Gonzalez WD, Joselyn JA, Kamide Y, Kroehl HW, Rostoker G. 1994. What is a geomagnetic storm? J Geophys Res 99(A4): 5771–5792. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA02867. [Google Scholar]
Gopalswamy N. 2022. The Sun and space weather. Atmosphere 13(11): 1781. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13111781. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gopalswamy N, Davila JM, Cyr OS, Sittler EC, Auchère F, et al. 2011. Earth-Affecting Solar Causes Observatory (EASCO): A potential international living with a star mission from Sun–Earth L5. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 73(5–6): 658–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.01.013. [Google Scholar]
Gopalswamy N, Yashiro S, Akiyama S, Xie H, Mäkelä P, et al. 2022. What is unusual about the third largest geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 24? J Geophys Res (Space Phys) 127(8): e30404. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030404. [Google Scholar]
Gosling JT. 1990. Coronal mass ejections and magnetic flux ropes in interplanetary space, American Geophysical Union (AGU), pp. 343–364. ISBN 9781118663868. https://doi.org/10.1029/GM058p0343. [Google Scholar]
Henon M. 1969. Numerical exploration of the restricted problem, V. Astron Astrophys 1: 223–238. [Google Scholar]
Henon M. 1970. Numerical exploration of the restricted problem. VI. Hill’s case: Non-periodic orbits. Astron Astrophys 9: 24–36. [Google Scholar]
Hill S, Pizzo VJ. 2003. Advanced solar imaging from the GOES R spacecraft. In: Innovative Telescopes and Instrumentation for Solar Astrophysics, Keil SL, Avakyan SV (Eds.), International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, Vol. 4853, pp. 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.460385. [Google Scholar]
Isavnin A. 2016. FRiED: A novel three-dimensional model of coronal mass ejections. Astrophys J 833(2): 267. https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Iyer KN, Jadav RM, Jadeja AK, Manoharan PK, Sharma S, et al. 2006. Space Weather effects of coronal mass ejection. J Astrophys Astron 27(2–3): 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02702524. [Google Scholar]
Kaiser ML. 2005. The STEREO mission: An overview. Adv Space Res 36(8): 1483–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2004.12.066. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kaiser ML, Kucera T, Davila J, St Cyr O, Guhathakurta M, et al. 2008. The STEREO mission: An introduction. Space Sci Rev 136(1): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-007-9277-0. [Google Scholar]
Kataoka R, Ebisuzaki T, Kusano K, Shiota D, Inoue S, et al. 2009. Three-dimensional MHD modeling of the solar wind structures associated with 13 December 2006 coronal mass ejection. J Geophys Res (Space Phys) 114(A10): A10102. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014167. [Google Scholar]
Laker R, Horbury TS, O’Brien H, Fauchon-Jones EJ, Angelini V, et al. 2024. Using Solar Orbiter as an upstream solar wind monitor for real time Space Weather predictions. Space Weather 22(2): e2023SW003628. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003628. [Google Scholar]
Latiff ZIA, Hairuddin MA, Zainuddin A, Ashar NDK, Jusoh MH. 2024. Analytical approach to SYM-H based geomagnetic storm classifications using statistical features extraction. J Phys Conf Ser 2915: 012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2915/1/012010. [Google Scholar]
Lemen JR, Title AM, Akin DJ, Boerner PF, Chou C, et al. 2012. The atmospheric imaging assembly (AIA) on the solar dynamics observatory (SDO). Sol Phys 275(1): 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9776-81. [Google Scholar]
Liu YD, Luhmann JG, Kajdič P, Kilpua EKJ, Lugaz N, et al. 2014. Observations of an extreme storm in interplanetary space caused by successive coronal mass ejections. Nat Commun 5: 3481. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4481. [Google Scholar]
Long DM, Green LM, Pecora F, Brooks DH, Strecker H, et al. 2023. The eruption of a magnetic flux rope observed by Solar Orbiter and parker solar probe. Astrophys J 955(2): 152. https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acefd5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Loto’aniu PTM, Davis A, Jarvis A, Grotenhuis M, Rich FJ, et al. 2023. Initial on-orbit results from the GOES-18 spacecraft science magnetometer. Space Sci Rev 219(8): 84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-023-01032-3. [Google Scholar]
Lugaz N, Farrugia CJ, Winslow RM, Al-Haddad N, Galvin AB, et al. 2018. On the spatial coherence of magnetic ejecta: Measurements of coronal mass ejections by multiple spacecraft longitudinally separated by 0.01 au. Astrophys J Lett 864(1): L7. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aad9f4. [Google Scholar]
Lugaz N, Lee CO, Al-Haddad N, Lillis RJ, Jian LK, et al. 2024a. The need for near-Earth multi-spacecraft heliospheric measurements and an explorer mission to investigate interplanetary structures and transients in the near-Earth heliosphere. Space Sci Rev 220(7): 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-024-01108-8. [Google Scholar]
Lugaz N, Zhuang B, Scolini C, Al-Haddad N, Farrugia CJ, et al. 2024b. The width of magnetic ejecta measured near 1 au: Lessons from STEREO-A measurements in 2021–2022. Astrophys J 962(2): 193. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad17b9. [Google Scholar]
Lugaz N, Al-Haddad N, Zhuang B, Möstl C, Davies EE, et al. 2025. The need for a Sub-L1 space weather research mission: Current knowledge gaps on coronal mass ejections. Space Weather 23(2): 2024SW004189. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW004189. [Google Scholar]
Lundquist S. 1950. Magnetohydrostatic fields. Ark Fys 2: 361–365. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1570009749193268480. [Google Scholar]
MacAlester MH, Murtagh W. 2014. Extreme space weather impact: An emergency management perspective. Space Weather 12(8): 530–537. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014SW001095. [Google Scholar]
Maharana A, Isavnin A, Scolini C, Wijsen N, Rodriguez L, et al. 2022. Implementation and validation of the FRi3D flux rope model in EUHFORIA. Adv Space Res 70(6): 1641–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.05.056. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Maruca B, Qudsi RA, Alterman B, Walsh B, Korreck KE, et al. 2022. Radial trends in plasma parameters across the heliosphere. In: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2022, SH35D–1837. [Google Scholar]
Maruca BA, Qudsi RA, Alterman BL, Walsh BM, Korreck KE, et al. 2023. The trans-heliospheric survey. Radial trends in plasma parameters across the heliosphere. Astron Astrophys 675: A196. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202345951. [Google Scholar]
Matthaeus WH, Wan M, Servidio S, Greco A, Osman KT, et al. 2015. Intermittency, nonlinear dynamics and dissipation in the solar wind and astrophysical plasmas. Philos Trans Roy Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci 373(2041): 20140154. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rsta.2014.0154. [Google Scholar]
Mayank P, Lotz S, Vaidya B, Mishra W, Chakrabarty D. 2024. Study of evolution and geo-effectiveness of coronal mass ejection–coronal mass ejection interactions using magnetohydrodynamic simulations with SWASTi framework. Astrophys J 976(1): 126. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8084. [Google Scholar]
Mayaud PN. 1980. Derivation, meaning, and use of geomagnetic indices. Geophys Monogr Ser 22: 607. https://doi.org/10.1029/GM022. [Google Scholar]
Müller D, St Cyr OC, Zouganelis I, Gilbert HR, Marsden R, et al. 2020. The Solar Orbiter mission. Science overview. Astron Astrophys 642: A1. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038467. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Odstrcil D. 2003. Modeling 3-D solar wind structure. Adv Space Res 32(4): 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00332-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Palmerio E. 2025. Monitoring the solar wind before it reaches L1. Space Weather 23(11): e2025SW004452. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025SW004452. [Google Scholar]
Perozzi E, Ceccaroni M, Valsecchi GB, Rossi A. 2017. Distant retrograde orbits and the asteroid hazard. Eur Phys J Plus 132(8): 367. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2017-11644-0. [Google Scholar]
Pomoell J, Poedts S. 2018. EUHFORIA: European heliospheric forecasting information asset. J Space Weather Space Clim 8: A35. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2018020. [Google Scholar]
Posner A, Arge CN, Staub J, StCyr OC, Folta D, et al. 2021. A multi-purpose heliophysics L4 mission. Space Weather 19(9): e2021SW002777. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10506845.1. [Google Scholar]
Provinciali L, Calcagno D, Amabili P, Saita G, Riccobono D, et al. 2024. HENON – main challenges of a space weather alerts CubeSat mission. In: 2024 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO58975.2024.10521299. [Google Scholar]
Ravishankar A, Michałek G. 2019. Estimation of arrival time of coronal mass ejections in the vicinity of the Earth using SOlar and Heliospheric Observatory and Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory observations. Sol Phys 294(9): 125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1470-2. [Google Scholar]
Rodriguez L, Scolini C, Mierla M, Zhukov A, West M. 2020. Space weather monitor at the L5 point: A case study of a CME observed with STEREO B. Space Weather 18(10): e2020SW002533. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002533. [Google Scholar]
Ruiz ME, Dasso S, Matthaeus W, Weygand J. 2014. Characterization of the turbulent magnetic integral length in the solar wind: From 0.3 to 5 astronomical units. Sol Phys 289(10): 3917–3933. [Google Scholar]
Sangalli M, Verdini A, Landi S, Papini E. 2025. The effects of expansion and turbulence on the interplanetary evolution of a magnetic cloud. Astron Astrophys 699: A258. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202554559. [Google Scholar]
Schatten KH, Wilcox JM, Ness NF. 1969. A model of interplanetary and coronal magnetic fields. Sol Phys 6(3): 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146478. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Scolini C, Rodriguez L, Mierla M, Pomoell J, Poedts S. 2019. Observation-based modelling of magnetised coronal mass ejections with EUHFORIA. Astron Astrophys 626: A122. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935053. [Google Scholar]
Scolini C, Lugaz N, Winslow RM, Farrugia CJ, Magyar N, et al. 2024. On the role of Alfvénic fluctuations as mediators of coherence within interplanetary coronal mass ejections: Investigation of multi-spacecraft measurements at 1 au. Astrophys J 961(1): 135. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad0ed1. [Google Scholar]
Shen C, Wang Y, Pan Z, Miao B, Ye P, et al. 2014. Full-halo coronal mass ejections: Arrival at the Earth. J Geophys Res (Space Phys) 119(7): 5107–5116. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020001. [Google Scholar]
Shiota D, Kataoka R. 2016. Magnetohydrodynamic simulation of interplanetary propagation of multiple coronal mass ejections with internal magnetic flux rope (SUSANOO-CME). Space Weather 14(2): 56–75. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2015SW001308. [Google Scholar]
Smith CW, L’Heureux J, Ness NF, Acuña MH, Burlaga LF, et al. 1998. The ACE magnetic fields experiment. Space Sci Rev 86: 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005092216668. [Google Scholar]
Spencer E, Kasturi P, Patra S, Horton W, Mays ML. 2011. Influence of solar wind-magnetosphere coupling functions on the Dst index. J Geophys Res (Space Phys) 116(A12): A12235. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016780. [Google Scholar]
St Cyr OC, Mesarch MA, Maldonado HM, Folta DC, Harper AD, et al. 2000. Space Weather Diamond: A four spacecraft monitoring system. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 62(14): 1251–1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(00)00069-9. [Google Scholar]
Stiefel MZ, Kuhar M, Limousin O, Dickson ECM, Volpara A, et al. 2025. Using the STIX background detector as a proxy for GOES. Astron Astrophys 694: A138. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452574. [Google Scholar]
Temmer M, Nitta NV. 2015. Interplanetary propagation behavior of the fast coronal mass ejection on 23 July 2012. Sol Phys 290(3): 919–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0642-3. [Google Scholar]
Thernisien A. 2011. Implementation of the graduated cylindrical shell model for the three-dimensional reconstruction of coronal mass ejections. Astrophys J Suppl 194(2): 33. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Thernisien AFR, Howard RA, Vourlidas A. 2006. Modeling of flux rope coronal mass ejections. Astrophys J 652(1): 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1086/508254. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Verbanac G, Živković S, Vršnak B, Bandić M, Hojsak T. 2013. Comparison of geoeffectiveness of coronal mass ejections and corotating interaction regions. Astron Astrophys 558: A85. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220417. [Google Scholar]
Verbeke C, Pomoell J, Poedts S. 2019. The evolution of coronal mass ejections in the inner heliosphere: Implementing the spheromak model with EUHFORIA. Astron Astrophys 627: A111. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834702. [Google Scholar]
Vourlidas A, Howard RA, Plunkett SP, Korendyke CM, Thernisien AF, et al. 2016. The wide-field imager for solar probe plus (WISPR). Space Sci Rev 204(1): 83–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0114-y. [Google Scholar]
Vourlidas A, Patsourakos S, Savani NP. 2019. Predicting the geoeffective properties of coronal mass ejections: Current status, open issues and path forward. Philos Trans Roy Soc London Ser A 377(2148): 20180096. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0096. [Google Scholar]
Wang Y, Shen CL, Wang S, Ye PZ. 2003. An empirical formula relating the geomagnetic storm’s intensity to the interplanetary parameters: −V B_z and Δ t. Geophys Res Lett 30(20): 2039. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017901. [Google Scholar]
Wang Y, Shen C, Wang S, Ye P. 2004. Deflection of coronal mass ejection in the interplanetary medium. Sol Phys 222(2): 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOLA.0000043576.21942.aa. [Google Scholar]
Wang Y, Wang B, Shen C, Shen F, Lugaz N. 2014. Deflected propagation of a coronal mass ejection from the corona to interplanetary space. J Geophys Res (Space Phys) 119(7): 5117–5132. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019537. [Google Scholar]
Webb D, Biesecker D, Gopalswamy N, Cyr OS, Davila J, et al. 2010. Using STEREO-B as an L5 space weather pathfinder mission. Space Res Today 178: 10–16. [Google Scholar]
Weiler E, Möstl C, Davies EE, Veronig AM, Amerstorfer UV, et al. 2025. First observations of a geomagnetic superstorm with a sub-L1 monitor. Space Weather 23(3): 2024SW004260. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW004260. [Google Scholar]
Xie H, Ofman L, Lawrence G. 2004. Cone model for halo CMEs: Application to space weather forecasting. J Geophys Res (Space Phys) 109(A3) A03109. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010226. [Google Scholar]
Zhuang B, Wang Y, Hu Y, Shen C, Liu R, et al. 2019. Numerical simulations on the deflection of coronal mass ejections in the interplanetary space. Astrophys J 876(1): 73. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab139e. [Google Scholar]
Zimbardo G, Ying B, Nisticò G, Feng L, Rodríguez-García L, et al. 2023. A high-latitude coronal mass ejection observed by a constellation of coronagraphs: Solar Orbiter/Metis, STEREO-A/COR2, and SOHO/LASCO. Astron Astrophys 676: A48. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346011. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.