EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 2 (2012) J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2 (2012) A04 References
Issue
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 2, 2012
EU-FP7 funded space weather projects
Article Number A04
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2012005
Published online 06 June 2012
  • Aikin, A.C., A.E. Hedin, D.J. Kendig, and S. Drake, Thermospheric molecular oxygen measurements using the ultraviolet spectrometer on the Solar Maximum Mission spacecraft, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 17607–17613, 1993. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barlier, F., C. Berger, J.L. Falin, G. Kockarts, and G. Thuillier, A thermospheric model based on satellite drag data, Ann. Geophys., 34, 9–24, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  • Berger, C., R. Biancale, M. Ill, and F. Barlier, Improvement of the empirical thermospheric model DTM: DTM-94 – a comparative review on various temporal variations and prospects in space geodesy applications, J. Geodesy., 72, 161–178, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • Bowman, B.R., F.A. Marcos, and M.J. Kendra, A method for computing accurate daily atmospheric density values from satellite drag data, AAS 04-173, 14th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Conference, Maui, Hawaii, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • Bowman, B.R., W.K. Tobiska, F. Marcos, C.S. Lin, and W.J. Burke, A new empirical thermospheric density model JB2008 using new solar and geomagnetic indices, AIAA 2008-6438, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • Bruinsma, S.L., and J.M Forbes, Medium to large-scale density variability as observed by CHAMP, Space Weather, 6, S08002, DOI: 10.1029/2008SW000411, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bruinsma, S.L., and J.M Forbes, Anomalous behavior of the thermosphere during solar minimum observed by CHAMP and GRACE, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A11323, DOI: 10.1029/2010JA015605, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bruinsma, S., D. Tamagnan, and R. Biancale, Atmospheric densities derived from CHAMP/STAR accelerometer observations, Planet. Space Sci., 52, 297–312, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • Bruinsma, S., G. Thuillier, and F. Barlier, The DTM-2000 empirical thermosphere model with new data assimilation and constraints, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 65, 1053–1070, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • Doornbos, E., Thermospheric density and wind determination from satellite dynamics, Springer Theses Series, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • Dudok de Wit, T., and S. Bruinsma, Determination of the most pertinent EUV proxy for use in thermosphere modeling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L19102, DOI: 10.1029/2011GL049028, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • ESA, GOCE mission report, SP-1233(1), European Space Agency, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • Heath, D.F., and B.M. Schlesinger, The Mg 280 nm doublet as a monitor of changes in solar ultraviolet irradiance, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 8672–8682, 1986. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacchia, L.G., and J. Slowey, Accurate drag determinations for eight artificial satellites; atmospheric densities and temperatures, Smithson. Astrophys. Obs. Spec. Rep., 100, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  • Keating, G.M., and E.J. Prior, The winter helium bulge, Space Res., 8, 982–992, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  • Marcos, F.A., B.R. Bowman, and R.E. Sheehan, Accuracy of Earth’s thermospheric neutral density models, AIAA 2006-6167, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Keystone, Colorado, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • Marty, J.C., S. Loyer, F. Perosanz, F. Mercier, G. Bracher, B. Legresy, L. Portier, H. Capdeville, F. Fund, J.M. Lemoine, and R. Biancale, GINS: the CNES/GRGS GNSS scientific software, 3rd International Colloquium Scientific and Fundamental Aspects of the Galileo Programme, ESA Proceedings WPP326, 31 August–2 September 2011, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • Menviele, M., and A. Berthelier, The K-derived planetary indices: description and availability, Rev. Geophys., 29, 415–432, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearlman, M.R., J.J. Degnan, and J.M. Bosworth, The international laser ranging service, Adv. Space Res., 30, 135–143, DOI: 10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00277-6, 2002. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Picone, J.M., J.T. Emmert, and J.L. Lean, Thermospheric densities derived from spacecraft orbits: Accurate processing of two-line element sets, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A03301, DOI: 10.1029/2004JA010585, 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Picone, J.M., A.E. Hedin, D.P. Drob, and A.C. Aikin, NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparisons and scientific issues, J. Geophys. Res., 107, (A12), 1468, DOI: 10.1029/2002JA009430, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • Reigber, Ch., R. Bock, Ch. Förste, L. Grunwaldt, N. Jakowski, H. Lühr, P. Schwintzer, and C. Tilgner, CHAMP Phase B Executive Summary, Scientific Technical Report STR96/13, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Germany, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • Sentman, L.H., Free molecule flow theory and its application to the determination of aerodynamic forces, LMSC-448514, Lockheed Missiles Space Company, 1961. [Google Scholar]
  • Solomon, S.C., T.N. Woods, L.V. Didkovsky, J.T. Emmert, and L. Qian, Anomalously low solar extreme‐ultraviolet irradiance and thermospheric density during solar minimum, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L16103, DOI: 10.1029/2010GL044468, 2010. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Storz, M.F., B.R. Bowman, M.J.I. Branson, S.J. Casali, and W.K. Tobiska, High accuracy satellite drag model (HASDM), Adv. Space Res., 36, 2497–2505, DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2004.02.020, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • Tapley, B.D., S. Bettadpur, M. Watkins, and C. Reigber, The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L09607, DOI: 10.1029/2004GL019920, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • Thuillier, G., and S. Bruinsma, The Mg II index for upper atmosphere modelling, Ann. Geophys., 19, 219–228, 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.