J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 3, 2013
Space Weather and Challenges for Modern Society
Article Number A19
Number of page(s) 7
Published online 07 May 2013
  • Andreeova, K., T.I. Pulkkinen, M. Palmroth, and R. McPherron, Geoefficiency of solar wind discontinuities, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 73, 112–122, DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2010.03.006, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Béland, J., and K. Small, Space weather effects on power transmission systems: the cases of Hydro-Québec and Transpower New Zealand Ltd, in Effects of space weather on technological infrastructure, edited by I.A., Daglis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 287–299, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • Boteler, D.H., Space weather effects on power systems, in: Space Weather, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., 125, edited by P., Song, H.J. Singer, and G.L. Siscoe. AGU, Washington, DC, pp. 347–352, 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boteler, D.H., and G. Jansen van Beek, August 4, 1972 revisited: a new look at the geomagnetic disturbance that caused the L4 cable system outage, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 577–580, 1999. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boteler, D.H., R.J. Pirjola, and H. Nevanlinna, The effects of geomagnetic disturbances on electrical systems at Earth’s surface, Adv. Space Res., 22, 17–27, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • Carreras, B., V. Lynch, D. Newman, and I. Dobson, Blackout mitigation assessment in power transmission lines, Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1173911, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • FEMA, M., Managing critical disasters in the transatlantic domain – the case of a geomagnetic storm. NOAA, FEMA, Washington, DC, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • Forbes, K.F., and O.C. St. Cyr, Space weather and the electricity market: an initial assessment, Space Weather, 2, S10003, DOI: 10.1029/2003SW000005, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Forbes, K.F., and O.C. St. Cyr, Solar activity and economic fundamentals: evidence from 12 geographically disparate power grids, Space Weather, 6, S10003, DOI: 10.1029/2007SW000350, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • Forbes, K.F., and O.C. St. Cyr, An anatomy of space weather’s electricity market impact: case of the PJM power grid and the performance of its 500 kV transformers, Space Weather, 8, S09004, DOI: 10.1029/2009SW000498, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gaunt, C.T., and G. Coetzee, Transformer failures in regions incorrectly considered to have low GIC-risk. IEEE PowerTech, IEEE, Lausanne, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • Grimes, D.A., and K.F. Schulz, Compared to what? Finding controls for case-control studies, The Lancet, 365, 1429–1433, 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hapgood, M., Lloyd’s 360° risk insight: Space Weather: Its impacts on Earth and the implications for business. Lloyd’s, London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • Hapgood, M., Prepare for the coming space weather storm, Nature, 484, 311–313, DOI: 10.1038/484311a, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • JASON, Impacts of severe space weather on the electric grid (JSR-11-320). The MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • Kappenman, J., Geomagnetic storms and their impacts on the US power grid (Tech. Rep. Meta-R-319), Metatech Corp, Goleta, CA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • Kappenman, J.G., An overview of the impulsive geomagnetic field disturbances, power grid impacts associated with the violent Sun-Earth connection events of 2931 October 2003 and a comparative evaluation with other contemporary storms, Space Weather, 3, DOI: 10.1029/2004SW000128, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • Kappenman, J.G., L.J. Zanetti, and W.A. Radasky, Geomagnetic storm forecasts and the power industry, Eos Trans. AGU, 78, 37, 1997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Morris, J.A., and M.J. Gardner, Calculating confidence intervals for relative risks (odds ratios) and standardized ratios and rates. British Med. J., 296, 1313–1316, 1988. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Newell, P., T. Sotirelis, K. Liou, C.I. Meng, and F.J. Rich, A nearly universal solar wind-magnetosphere coupling function inferred from 10 magnetospheric state variables, J. Geophys. Res., 112, A21026, DOI: 10.1029/2006JA012015, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • PJM State and Member Training Dept, Weather and environmental emergencies. PJM,, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • Pulkkinen, T., Space weather: terrestrial perspective, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 4, 1, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • Russell, C.T., and R.L. McPherron, Semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 92–108, DOI: 10.1029/JA078i001p00092, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  • Schrijver, C., and G. Siscoe, Heliophysics. Space storms, radiation, causes and effects, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • Schrijver, C.J., Driving major solar flares and eruptions: a review, Adv. Space Res., 43, 739–755, DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2008.11.004, 2009. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schulz, K.F., and D.A. Grimes, Case-control studies research in reverse, The Lancet, 359, 431–434, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Space Studies Board, Severe space weather events – understanding societal and economic impacts. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • Talukdar, S., J. Apt, M. Ilic, L. Lave, and M. Morgan, Cascading failures: survival vs. prevention, The Electricity Journal, 16 (9), 25–31, 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Veronig, A., M. Temmer, A. Hanslmeier, W. Otruba, and M. Messerotti, Temporal aspects and frequency distributions of solar soft X-ray flares, A&A, 382, 1070–1080, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011694, 2002. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Wacholder, S., D.T. Silverman, J.K. McLaughlin, and J.S. Mandel, Selection controls in case-control studies, American Journal of Epidemiology, 135, 1042–1050, 1992. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.