Open Access
Issue
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 4, 2014
Article Number A29
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014025
Published online 10 October 2014
  • Balch, C.C., Updated verification of the Space Weather Prediction Center’s solar energetic particle prediction model, Space Weather, 6 (1), DOI: 10.1029/2007SW000337, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • Bartels, J., N.H. Heck, and H.F. Johnston, The three-hour range index measuring geomagnetic activity, Geophys. Res., 44, 411–454, DOI: 10.1029/TE044i004p00411, 1939. [Google Scholar]
  • Berdyugina, S.V., and I.G. Usoskin, Active longitudes in sunspot activity: Century scale persistence, A&A, 405, 1121–1128, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030748, 2003. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Berghmans, D., R.A.M. Van der Linden, P. Vanlommel, R. Warnant, and A.N. Zhukov, et al., Solar activity: nowcasting and forecasting at the SIDC, First European Space Weather Week (ESTEC, Noordwijk November 2004), Ann. Geophys., 23 (9), 3115–3128, DOI: 10.5194/angeo-23-3115-2005, 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crown, M.D., Validation of the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center’s solar flare forecasting look-up table and forecaster-issued probabilities, Space Weather, 10, 6006, DOI: 10.1029/2011SW000760, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • Finley, J.P., Tornado predictions, Am. Meteorol. J., 1, 85–88, 1884. [Google Scholar]
  • Hochedez, J.-F., A. Zhukov, E. Robbrecht, R. Van der Linden, D. Berghmans, P. Vanlommel, A. Theissen, and F. Clette, Solar weather monitoring, Ann. Geophys., 23, 3149–3161, DOI: 10.5194/angeo-23-3149-2005, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • Jolliffe, I.T., and D.B. Stephenson, Forecast verification. A practitioners Guide in Atmospheric Science, 2nd edn., Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • Kruger, A., Introduction to solar radio astronomy and radio physics, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  • Odstrcil, D., V. J. Pizzo, J. A. Linker, P. Riley, R. Lionello, Z. Mikic, and J. G. Luhmann, Initial coupling of coronal and heliospheric numerical magnetohydrodynamic codes, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 66, 1311–1326, Doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2004.04.007, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • Robbrecht, E., D. Berghmans, and R.A.M. Van der Linden, Automated LASCO CME Catalog for Solar Cycle 23: Are CMEs Scale Invariant? ApJ, 691, 12–22, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/691/2/1222, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • Tapping, K.F., The 10.7 cm solar radio flux (F10.7), Space Weather, 11, 394–406, DOI: 10.1002/swe.20064, 2013. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thernisien, A.F.R., R.A. Howard, and A. Vourlidas, Modeling of flux rope coronal mass ejections, ApJ, 652 (1), 763–773, DOI: 10.1086/508254, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • Vršnak, B., T. Žic, D. Vrbanec, M. Temmer, T. Rollett, C. Möstl, A. Veronig, J. Čalogovič, M. Dumbovič, S. Lulič, Y.-J. Moon, and A. Shanmugaraju, Propagation of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections: The Drag-Based Model, Sol. Phys., 285 (1–2), 295–315, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-012-0035-4, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • Xue, X.H., C.B. Wang, and X.K. Dou, An ice-cream cone model for coronal mass ejections, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 110 (8), DOI: 10.1029/2004JA010698, 2005. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.