Open Access
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 5, 2015
Article Number A13
Number of page(s) 15
Published online 16 June 2015
  • Adams, W.G. Comparison of simultaneous magnetic disturbances at several observatories. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser., 183, 131–140, 1892. [CrossRef]
  • Akasofu, S.I., and S. Chapman. The sudden commencements of geomagnetic storms. URANIA, 44 (250), 321–358, 1959.
  • Araki, T. Global structure of geomagnetic sudden commencements, Planet. Space Sci., 25, 373–384, 1977. [CrossRef]
  • Araki, T. A physical model of the geomagnetic sudden commencement. In: M.J., Engebretson, K. Takahashi, and M. Scholer, Editors. Solar Wind Sources of Magnetospheric Ultra-Low-Frequency Waves, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 81, AGU, Washington DC, 183, 1994. [CrossRef]
  • Araki, T., T. Takeuchi, and Y. Araki. Rise time of geomagnetic sudden commencements – statistical analysis of ground geomagnetic data. Earth Planets Space, 56, 289–293, 2004. [CrossRef]
  • Araki, T., K. Keika, T. Kamei, H. Yang, and S. Alex. Nighttime enhancement of the amplitude of geomagnetic sudden commencements and its dependence on IMF-Bz. Earth Planets Space, 58, 45–50, 2006. [CrossRef]
  • Auster, H.U., K.H. Glassmeier, W. Magnes, O. Aydogar, W. Baumjohann, et al. The THEMIS fluxgate magnetometer. Space Sci. Rev., 141, 235–264, 2008, DOI: 10.1007/s11214-008-9365-9. [CrossRef]
  • Balogh, A., M.W. Dunlop, S.W.H. Cowley, D.J. Southwood, J.G. Thomlinson, et al. The cluster magnetic field investigation. Space Sci. Rev., 79, 65–92, 1997. [CrossRef]
  • Belian, R.D., G.R. Gisler, T. Cayton, and R. Christensen. High-z energetic particles at geostationary orbit during the great solar proton event series of October 1989. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 16897, 1992. [CrossRef]
  • Carpenter, D.L., and R.R. Anderson. An ISEE/whistler model of equatorial electron-density in the magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 1097–1108, 1992, DOI: 10.1097/91JA01549. [CrossRef]
  • Colburn, D.S., and C.P. Sonett. Discontinuities in the solar wind. Space Sci. Rev., 5, 43, 1966. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Curto, J.J., T. Araki, and L.F. Alberca. Evolution of the concept of Sudden Storm Commencements and their operative identification. Earth Planets Space, 59, i–xii, 2007. [CrossRef]
  • Davis, T.N., and M. Sugiura. Auroral electrojet activity index AE and its universal time variations. J. Geophys. Res., 71 (3), 785–801, 1966, DOI: 10.1029/JZ071i003p00785. [CrossRef]
  • Ellis, W. On the simultaneity of magnetic variations at different places on occasions of magnetic disturbance, and on the relation between magnetic and earth current phenomena. Proc. Roy. Soc., 102, 191, 1892. [CrossRef]
  • Frank, L.A., K.L. Ackerson, W.R. Paterson, J.A. Lee, M.R. English, and G.L. Pickett. The Comprehensive Plasma Instrumentation (CPI) for the Geotail spacecraft. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 46, 23–37, 1994. [CrossRef]
  • Iyemori, T. Storm-time magnetospheric currents inferred from mid-latitude geomagnetic field variations. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 42, 1249–1265, 1990. [CrossRef]
  • Keika, K., R. Nakamura, W. Baumjohann, A. Runov, T. Takada, et al. Response of the inner magnetosphere and the plasma sheet to a sudden impulse. J. Geophys. Res., 113, A07S35, 2008, DOI: 10.1029/2007JA012763.
  • Keika, K., R. Nakamura, W. Baumjohann, V. Angelopoulos, P.J. Chi, et al. Substorm expansion triggered by a sudden impulse front propagating from the dayside magnetopause. J. Geophys. Res., 114, A00C24, 2009, DOI: 10.1029/2008JA013445.
  • Kokubun, S. Characteristics of storm sudden commencement at geostationary orbit. J. Geophys. Res., 88, 10025–10033, 1983. [CrossRef]
  • Kokubun, S., T. Yamamoto, M.H. Acuña, K. Hayashi, K. Shiokawa, and H. Kawano. The Geotail magnetic-field experiment. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 46, 7–21, 1994. [CrossRef]
  • Lepping, R.P., M.H. Acuña, L.F. Burlaga, W.M. Farrell, J.A. Slavin, et al. The Wind magnetic field investigation. Space Sci. Rev., 71, 207–299, 1995, DOI: 10.1007/BF00751330. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Lin, R.P., K.A. Anderson, S. Ashford, C. Carlson, D. Curtis, et al. A three-dimensional plasma and energetic particle investigation for the Wind spacecraft, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 125–153, 1995, DOI: 10.1007/BF00751328. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Matsushita, S. Studies on sudden commencements of geomagnetic storms using IGY data from United States stations. J. Geophys. Res., 65, 1423–1435, 1960. [CrossRef]
  • Rodés, L. On the non-simultaneity of magnetic storms. Terr. Mag. Atmos. Electr., 27 (4), 161–166, 1922. [CrossRef]
  • Samsonov, A.A., D.G. Sibeck, N.V. Zolotova, H.K. Biernat, S.H. Chen, et al. Propagation of a sudden impulse through the magnetosphere initiating magnetospheric Pc5 pulsations. J. Geophys. Res., 116, A10216, 2011, DOI: 10.1029/2011JA016706. [CrossRef]
  • Shue, J.H., P. Song, C.T. Russell, J.T. Steinberg, J.K. Chao, et al. Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 17691–17700, 1998. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Siscoe, G.L., V. Formisano, A.J. Lazarus. Relation between geomagnetic sudden impulses and solar wind pressure changes – an experimental investigation. J. Geophys. Res., 73, 15, 1968.
  • Smith, C.W., J. L’Heureux, N.F. Ness, M.H. Acuña, L.F. Burgala, and J. Scheifele. The ACE magnetic fields experiment. Space Sci. Rev., 86, 613–632, 1998, DOI: 10.1023/A:1005092216668. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Sugiura, M., and D.J. Poros. Hourly values of equatorial Dst for years 1957 to 1970, Rep. X-645-71-278, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 1971.
  • Tanakade, A. Short preliminary report on three sudden commencements of geomagnetic storms. Comptes Rendues Assemblée de Lisbone, 1933, UGGI, Assoc. Magnetism Electr. Bull., 9, 149–157, 1934.
  • Tsunomura, S., and T. Araki. Numerical analysis of equatorial enhancement of geomagnetic sudden commencement. Planet. Space Sci., 32 (5), 599–604, 1984. [CrossRef]
  • Tsurutani, B.T., and R.P. Lin. Acceleration of >47 keV ions and >2 keV electrons by interplanetary shocks at 1 AU, J. Geophys. Res., 90 (A1), 1–11, 1985. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Tsurutani, B.T., E. Echer, F.L. Guarnieri, and J.U. Kozyra. CAWSES November 7–8, 2004, superstorm: complex solar and interplanetary features in the post-solar maximum phase. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L06S05, 2008, DOI: 10.1029/2007GL031473. [CrossRef]
  • Tsurutani, B.T., G.S. Lakhina, O.P. Verkhoglyadova, W.D. Gonzalez, E. Echer, et al. A review of interplanetary discontinuities and their geomagnetic effects. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 73, 5, 2011, DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2010.04.001. [CrossRef]
  • Tsurutani, B.T., E. Echer, K. Shibata, O.P. Verkhoglyadova, A.J. Mannucci, et al. The interplanetary causes of geomagnetic activity during the 7–17 March 2012 interval: a CAWSES II overview. J. Space Weather Space Clim., 4, A02, 2014, DOI: 10.1051/swsc/2013056. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Tsyganenko, N.A. A magnetospheric field model with a warped tail current sheet. Planet. Space Sci., 37, 5–20, 1989. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  • Volwerk, M., J. Berchem, Y.V. Bogdanova, O.D. Constantinescu, M.W. Dunlop, et al. Interplanetary magnetic field rotations followed from L1 to the ground: the response of the Earth’s magnetosphere as seen by multi-spacecraft and ground-based observations. Ann. Geophys., 29, 1549–1569, 2011. [CrossRef]
  • Vorotnikov, V.S., C.W. Smith, Q. Hu, A. Szabo, R.M. Skoug, et al. Automated shock detection and analysis algorithm for space weather application. Space Weather, 6, S03002, 2008, DOI: 10.1029/2007SW000358. [CrossRef]
  • Wanliss, J.A., and K.M. Showalter. High-resolution global storm index: Dst versus YM-H. J. Geophys. Res., 111, A02202, 2006, DOI: 10.1029/2005JA011034.
  • Wilken, B., C.K. Goertz, D.N. Baker, P.R. Higbie, and T.A. Fritz. The SSC on July 29, 1977 and its propagation within the magnetosphere. J. Geosphys. Res., 87, 5901–5910, 1982. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.