Open Access
Issue
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 6, 2016
Article Number A37
Number of page(s) 16
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2016031
Published online 19 October 2016
  • Baker, D.N., T.I. Pulkkinen, V. Angelopoulos, W. Baumjohann, and R.L. McPherron. Neutral line model of substorms: past results and present view. J. Geophys. Res., 101, 12975–13010, 1996. [CrossRef]
  • Baumjohann, W., and R. Nakamura. Magnetospheric contributions to the terrestrial magnetic field. In: G. Schubert, Editor. Geomagnetism: Treatise on Geophysics, vol. 5, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 77–92, 2007. [CrossRef]
  • Birkeland, K. The Norwegian Aurora Polaris Expedition 1902–1903, vol. 1, 1st sect., Pitman, London, 1908.
  • Brekke, A., J.R. Doupnik, and P.M. Banks. Incoherent scatter measurements of E region conductivities and currents in the auroral zone. J. Geophys. Res., 79 (25), 3773–3790, 1974. [CrossRef]
  • Edvardsen, I., T.L. Hansen, M. Gjertsen, and H. Wilson. Improving the accuracy of directional wellbore surveying in the Norwegian Sea. SPE Drilling and Completion, 28 (2), 158–167, 2013. [CrossRef]
  • Edvardsen, I., E. Nyrnes, M.G. Johnsen, T.L. Hansen, U.P. Løvhaug, and J. Matzka. Improving the accuracy and reliability of MWD/magnetic-wellbore-directional surveying in the Barents Sea. SPE Drilling and Completion, 29 (2), 215–225, 2014. [CrossRef]
  • Ekseth, R., T. Torkildsen, A.G. Brooks, J.L. Weston, E. Nyrnes, H.F. Wilson, and K. Kovalenko. The reliability problem related to directional survey data, Paper SPE-133734, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2006, DOI: 10.2118/103734-MS.
  • Fukushima, N. Electric current systems for polar substorms and their magnetic effect below and above the ionosphere. Radio Sci., 6 (2), 269–275, 1971. [CrossRef]
  • Hunsucker, R.D., and J.K. Hargreaves. The high-latitude ionosphere and its effects on radio propagation, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 285–322, 2003.
  • Kepko, L., R.L. McPherron, O. Amm, S. Apatenkov, W. Baumjohann, et al. Substorm Current Wedge Revisited. Space Sci Rev., 190 (1), 1–46, 2014, DOI: 10.1007/s11214-014-0124-9. [CrossRef]
  • Laundal, K.M., and J.W. Gjerloev. What is the appropriate coordinate system for magnetometer data when analysing ionospheric currents? J. Geophys. Res. [Space Phys.], 119, 8637–8647, 2014. [CrossRef]
  • Lester, M. Storms and Substorms, Magnetic. In: D. Gubbins, and E. Herrero-Bervera, Editors. Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism, Paleomagnetism, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 926–927, 2007. [CrossRef]
  • Macmillan, S., and S. Grindrod. Confidence limits associated with values of the earth’s magnetic field used for directional drilling. SPE Drilling and Completion, 25 (2), 230–238, 2010. [CrossRef]
  • McPherron, R.L., C.T. Russell, and M.P. Aubry. Satellite studies of magnetospheric substorms on August 15, 1968: 9. Phenomenological model of substorms. J. Geophys. Res., 78, 3131–3149, 1973. [CrossRef]
  • Newitt, L.R. The effect of changing magnetic declination on the compass, Energy, Mines, and Resources Canada, Canada Communication Group Pub, Ottawa, Canada, 1991. [CrossRef]
  • Poedjono, B., S. Maus, and C. Manoj. Effective monitoring of auroral electrojet disturbances to enable accurate wellbore placement in the arctic, Paper OTC-24583, Offshore Technology Conference, 2014, DOI: 10.4043/24583-MS.
  • Rastogi, R.G., D.E. Winch, and M.E. James. Longitudinal effects in geomagnetic disturbances at mid-latitudes. Earth, Planets and Space, 53 (10), 969–979, 2001. [CrossRef]
  • Tanskanen, E.I., J.A. Slavin, A.J. Tanskanen, A. Viljanen, T.I. Pulkkinen, H.E.J. Koskinen, A. Pulkkinen, and J. Eastwood. Magnetospheric substorms are strongly modulated by interplanetary high-speed streams. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L16104, 2005. [CrossRef]
  • Williamson, H.S., P.A. Gurden, D.J. Kerridge, and G. Shiells. Application of interpolation in-field referencing to remote offshore locations, Paper SPE-49061, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1998, DOI: 10.2118/49061-MS.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.