Automated coronal hole identification via multi-thermal intensity segmentation | Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate

Developing New Space Weather Tools: Transitioning fundamental science to operational prediction systems

Open Access

Issue		J. Space Weather Space Clim. Volume 8, 2018 Developing New Space Weather Tools: Transitioning fundamental science to operational prediction systems


Article Number		A02
Number of page(s)		12
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017039
Published online		26 January 2018

Altschuler MD, Trotter DE, Orrall FQ. 1972. Coronal holes. Sol Phys 26: 354–365, DOI:10.1007/BF00165276. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Antonucci E, Dodero MA, Giordano S, Krishnakumar V, Noci G. 2004. Spectroscopic measurement of the plasma electron density and outflow velocity in a polar coronal hole. A&A 416: 749–758, DOI:10.1051/0004-6361:20031650. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Blake SP, Gallagher PT, McCauley J, Jones AG, Hogg C, Campanyà J, Beggan CD, Thomson AWP, Kelly GS, Bell D. 2016. Geomagnetically induced currents in the Irish power network during geomagnetic storms. Space Weather 14: 1136–1154, DOI:10.1002/2016SW001534. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Boteler DH. 2001. Space weather effects on power systems. Wash DC Am Geophys Union Geophys Monogr Ser 125: 347–352, DOI:10.1029/GM125p0347. [Google Scholar]
Boucheron LE, Valluri M, McAteer RTJ. 2016. Segmentation of coronal holes using active contours without edges. Sol Phys 291: 2353–2372, DOI:10.1007/s11207-016-0985-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cranmer SR. 2002. Coronal holes and the high-speed solar wind. Space Sci Rev 101: 229–294, DOI:10.1023/A:1020840004535. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cranmer SR. 2009. Coronal holes. Living Rev Sol Phys 6: DOI:10.12942/lrsp-2009-3. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Freeland SL, Handy BN. 1998. Data analysis with the solarsoft system. Sol Phys 182: 497–500, DOI:10.1023/A:1005038224881. [Google Scholar]
Fujiki K, Hirano M, Kojima M, Tokumaru M, Baba D, Yamashita M, Hakamada K. 2005. Relation between solar wind velocity and properties of its source region. Adv Space Res 35: 2185–2188, DOI:10.1016/j.asr.2005.05.057. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Harvey KL, Recely F. 2002. Polar coronal holes during cycles 22 and 23. Sol Phys 211: 31–52, DOI:10.1023/A:1022469023581. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Henney CJ, Harvey JW. 2005. Automated coronal hole detection using He 1083 nm spectroheliograms and photospheric magnetograms. In K. Sankarasubramanian, M. Penn, and A. Pevtsov, eds., Large-scale Structures and their Role in Solar Activity, vol. 346, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 261 p. [Google Scholar]
Huttunen KEJ, Kilpua SP, Pulkkinen A, Viljanen A, Tanskanen E. 2008. Solar wind drivers of large geomagnetically induced currents during the solar cycle 23. Space Weather 6: S10002, DOI:10.1029/2007SW000374. [Google Scholar]
Krieger AS, Timothy AF, Roelof EC. 1973. A Coronal hole and its identification as the source of a high velocity solar wind stream. Sol Phys 29: 505–525, DOI:10.1007/BF00150828. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Krista LD, Gallagher PT. 2009. Automated coronal hole detection using local intensity thresholding techniques. Sol Phys 256: 87–100, DOI:10.1007/s11207-009-9357-2. [Google Scholar]
Lemen JR, Title AM, Akin DJ, Boerner PF, Chou C, et al. 2012. The atmospheric imaging assembly (AIA) on the solar dynamics observatory (SDO). Sol Phys 275: 17–40, DOI:10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8. [Google Scholar]
Marshall RA, Dalzell M, Waters CL, Goldthorpe P, Smith EA. 2012. Geomagnetically induced currents in the New Zealand power network. Space Weather 10: S08, DOI:10.1029/2012SW000806. [Google Scholar]
Michelson AA. 1927. Studies in optics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill. [Google Scholar]
Nolte JT, Krieger AS, Timothy AF, Gold RE, Roelof EC, Vaiana G, Lazarus AJ, Sullivan JD, McIntosh PS. 1976. Coronal holes as sources of solar wind. Sol Phys 46: 303–322, DOI:10.1007/BF00149859. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pesnell WD, Thompson BJ, Chamberlin PC. 2012. The solar dynamics observatory (SDO). Sol Phys 275: 3–15, DOI:10.1007/s11207-011-9841-3. [Google Scholar]
Phillips K. 1995. Guide to the Sun, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
Reiss MA, Hofmeister SJ, De Visscher R, Temmer M, Veronig AM, Delouille V, Mampaey B, Ahammer H. 2015. Improvements on coronal hole detection in SDO/AIA images using supervised classification. J Space Weather Space Clim 5: A23, DOI:10.1051/swsc/2015025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Scherrer PH, Schou J, Bush RI, Kosovichev AG, Bogart RS, et al. 2012. The helioseismic and magnetic imager (HMI) investigation for the solar dynamics observatory (SDO). Sol Phys 275: 207–227, DOI:10.1007/s11207-011-9834-2. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Scholl IF, Habbal SR. 2008. Automatic detection and classification of coronal holes and filaments based on EUV and magnetogram observations of the solar disk. Sol Phys 248: 425–439, DOI:10.1007/s11207-007-9075-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Schou J, Scherrer PH, Bush RI, Wachter R, Couvidat S, et al. 2012. Design and ground calibration of the helioseismic and magnetic imager (HMI) instrument on the solar dynamics observatory (SDO). Sol Phys 275: 229–259, DOI:10.1007/s11207-011-9842-2. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Tsurutani BT, Gonzalez WD, Gonzalez ALC, Guarnieri FL, Gopalswamy N, et al. 2006. Corotating solar wind streams and recurrent geomagnetic activity: a review. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 111: A07S01, DOI:10.1029/2005JA011273. [Google Scholar]
Verbeeck C, Delouille V, Mampaey B, De Visscher R. 2014. The SPoCA-suite: software for extraction, characterization, and tracking of active regions and coronal holes on EUV images. A&A 561: A29, DOI:10.1051/0004-6361/201321243. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.