| Issue |
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 8, 2018
Space weather effects on GNSS and their mitigation
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A30 | |
| Number of page(s) | 23 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2018016 | |
| Published online | 13 June 2018 | |
- Armano M. et al. 2016. Sub-Femto-g Free Fall for Space-Based Gravitational Wave Observatories: LISA Pathfinder Results. Phys Rev Lett 116: 231101. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Böhm J. 2007. Tropospheric Delay Modelling at Radio Wavelengths for Space Geodetic Techniques. Habilitation Thesis at the Vienna University of Technology, Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Vienna, Austria, Geowissenschaftliche Mitteilungen, Iss. 80. [Google Scholar]
- Budnik F, Morley TA, Mackenzie RA. 2004. ESOĆs System for Interplanetary Orbit Determination: Implementation and Operational Experience, 18th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics, Munich (Germany), http://issfd.org/ISSFD_2004/papers/P0118.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Budnik F, Morley T, Croon M. 2012. Orbit Reconstruction for the GAIA mission. 23rd Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics, Pasadena, California, http://issfd.org/ISSFD_2012/ISSFD23_OD2_5.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Chao CC. 1973. A New Method to Predict Wet Zenith Range Correction from Surface Measurements. DSN Progress Report, Vol XIV, https://ipnpr.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_report2/XIV/XIVG.PDF. [Google Scholar]
- Coster AJ, Gaposchkin EM, Thornton LE. 1992. Real-Time Ionospheric Monitoring System Using the GPS. Technical Report 954, ESC-TR-91-179, AD-A256 916, Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, Massachusetts, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fd9d/527c1747b72636159ac5ee6fcf1997e01e66.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Davies K. 1990. Ionospheric Radio. IEE Electromagnetic Wave Series, 31, Peter Peregrinus Ltd., ISBN 0 86341 186 X. [Google Scholar]
- Estefan JA, Sovers OJ. 1994. A Comparative Survey of Current and Proposed Tropospheric Refraction-Delay Models for DSN Radio Metric Data Calibration. JPL Publication 94-24, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19950013586.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Feltens J. 2008. Vector methods to compute azimuth, elevation, ellipsoidal normal, and the Cartesian (X, Y, Z) to geodetic (φ, λ, h) transformation. J Geod 82: 493–504. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jakowski N, Hoque MM, Mayer C. 2011. A new global TEC model for estimating transionospheric radio wave propagation errors. J Geod 85: 965–974, DOI: 10.1007/s00190-011-0455-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- JPL. 2008. TRK- 2-23 Media Calibration Interface. 820-013, Deep Space Network (DSN), External Interface Specification, JPL D-16765, Revision C (draft), http://dawndata.igpp.ucla.edu/download.jsp?file=documents/Gravity/DATA_SET_DESCRIPTION/TRK-2-23_REVC_L5.PDF. [Google Scholar]
- Kelley MC. 1989. The Earth's Ionosphere, Plasma Physics and Electrodynamics, Academic Press Inc., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, San Diego New York Berkeley Boston London Sydney Tokyo Toronto. [Google Scholar]
- Klobuchar JA. 1975. A First-Order, Worldwide, Ionospheric, Time-Delay Algorithm. Bedford, Mass. United States Air Force, Air Force Systems Command, Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, Ionospheric Physics Laboratory. [Google Scholar]
- Komjathy A. 1997. Global Ionospheric Total Electron Content Mapping Using the Global Positioning System. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Technical Report No. 188, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada. [Google Scholar]
- Lagler K, Schindelegger M, Böhm J, Krásná H, Nilsson T. 2013. GPT2: Empirical slant delay model for radio space geodetic techniques. Geophys Res Lett 40: 1069–1073, DOI:10.1002/grl.50288. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mannucci AJ, Wilson BD, Yuan DN, Ho CH, Lindquister UJ, Runge TF. 1998. A global mapping technique for GPS-derived ionospheric total electron content measurements. Radio Sci 33: 565–582. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Moyer TD. 1971. Mathematical formulation of the Double Precision Orbit Determination Program (DPODP), NASA-JPL report JPL-TR-32-1527, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710017134.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Moyer TD. 2000. Formulation for Observed and Computed Values of Deep Space Network Data Types for Navigation, Deep Space Communications and Navigation Systems, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Publication 00-7, https://descanso.jpl.nasa.gov/monograph/series2/Descanso2_all.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Niell AE. 1996. Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelengths. J Geophys Res 101: 3227–3246. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Niell AE. 2000. Improved atmospheric mapping functions for VLBI and GPS. Earth Planets Space 52: 699–702. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ratcliffe JA. 1972. An introduction to the ionosphere and magnetosphere, Cambridge University Press, Great Britain. [Google Scholar]
- Saastamoinen JJ. 1973. Contributions to the theory of atmospheric refraction. Bulletin Géodesique 107: 13–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Schaer S. 1999. Mapping and predicting the Earth's Ionosphere using the Global Positioning System, PhD Thesis, AIUB, University of Berne, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
- Schaer S, Gurtner W, Feltens J. 1998. IONEX: The IONosphere Map Exchange Format Version 1. In: Proceedings of the IGS Analysis Centres Workshop. Darmstadt, Germany. [Google Scholar]
- Seeber G. 2003. Satellite Geodesy, 2nd edition, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sigl R. 1977. Ebene und Sphärische Trigonometrie, Hermann Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe. [Google Scholar]
- Steigenberger P, Böhm J, Tesmer V. 2009. Comparison of GMF/GPT with VMF1/ECMWF and implications for atmospheric loading. J Geod 83: 943–951, DOI: 10.1007/s00190-009-0311-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.