Open Access
Issue |
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 13, 2023
Topical Issue - Space Climate: Long-term effects of solar variability on the Earth’s environment
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 32 | |
Number of page(s) | 13 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2023029 | |
Published online | 22 December 2023 |
- Albert C, Ferriz-Mas A, Gaia F, Ulzega S. 2021. Can stochastic resonance explain recurrence of Grand Minima? Astrophys J Lett 916(2): L9. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac0fd6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Arlt R, Weiss N. 2014. Solar activity in the past and the chaotic behaviour of the dynamo. Space Sci. Rev. 186(1–4): 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0063-5. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Babcock H. 1961. The topology of the sun’s magnetic field and the 22-year cycle. Astrophys J 133: 572–589. https://doi.org/10.1086/147060. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Beer J, Tobias SM, Weiss NO. 2018. On long-term modulation of the Sun’s magnetic cycle. Mon Notices Royal Astron Soc 473(2): 1596–1602. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Brooke J, Moss D, Phillips A. 2002. Deep minima in stellar dynamos. A&A 395: 1013–1022. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20021320. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Brun AS, Strugarek A, Noraz Q, Perri B, Varela J, Augustson K, Charbonneau P, Toomre J. 2022. Powering stellar magnetism: energy transfers in cyclic dynamos of sun-like stars. Astrophys J 926(1): 21. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac469b. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bushby P. 2006. Zonal flows and grand minima in a solar dynamo model. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 371: 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10706.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cameron RH, Schüssler M. 2017. Understanding solar cycle variability. Astrophys J 843: 111. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa767a. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Charbonneau P. 2001. Multiperiodicity, chaos, and intermittency in a reduced model of the solar cycle. Solar Phys 199: 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010387509792. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Charbonneau P. 2020. Dynamo models of the solar cycle. Living Rev in Sol Phys 17(1): 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-020-00025-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Charbonneau P, Barlet G. 2011. The dynamo basis of solar cycle precursor schemes. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 73(2–3): 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.12.020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Charbonneau P, Blais-Laurier G, St-Jean C. 2004. Intermittency and phase persistence in a Babcock-Leighton model of the solar cycle. Astrophys J 616: L183–L186. https://doi.org/10.1086/426897. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Charbonneau P, St-Jean C, Zacharias P. 2005. Fluctuations in Babcock-Leighton dynamos. I. Period doubling and transition to chaos. Astrophys J 619: 613–622. https://doi.org/10.1086/426385. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dasi-Espuig M, Solanki SK, Krivova NA, Cameron R, Peñuela T. 2010. Sunspot group tilt angles and the strength of the solar cycle. A&A 518: A7. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014301. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Dikpati M, Charbonneau P. 1999. A Babcock-Leighton flux transport dynamo with solar-like differential rotation. Astrophys J 518(1): 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1086/307269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Durney BR. 2000. On the differences between odd and even solar cycles. Solar Phys. 196: 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005285315323. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fan Y. 2021. Magnetic fields in the solar convection zone. Living Rev in Sol Phys 18(1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-021-00031-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hale GE, Ellerman F, Nicholson SB, Joy AH. 1919. The magnetic polarity of sun-spots. Astrophys J 49: 153. https://doi.org/10.1086/142452. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hoyng P, Schmitt D, Teuben LJW. 1994. The effect of random alpha-fluctuations and the global properties of the solar magnetic field. A&A 289: 265–278. [Google Scholar]
- Jha BK, Karak BB, Mandal S, Banerjee D. 2020. Magnetic field dependence of bipolar magnetic region tilts on the sun: indication of tilt quenching. Astrophys J Lett 889(1): L19. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab665c. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jouve L, Proctor MRE, Lesur G. 2010. Buoyancy-induced time delays in Babcock-Leighton flux-transport dynamo models. A&A 519: A68. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014455. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Karak BB. 2023. Models for the long-term variations of solar activity. Living Rev Sol Phys 20: 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-023-00037-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Küker M, Arlt R, Rüdiger R. 1999. The Maunder minimum as due to magnetic Λ-quenching. A&A 343: 977–982. [Google Scholar]
- Leighton R. 1964. Transport of magnetic fields on the sun. Astrophys J 140: 1547–1562. https://doi.org/10.1086/148058. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- McClintock BH, Norton AA. 2013. Recovering Joy’s law as a function of solar cycle, hemisphere, and longitude. Sol Phys 287(1–2): 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0338-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Moss D, Brandenburg A, Tavakol R, Tuominen I. 1992. Stochastic effects in mean-field dynamos. A&A 265: 843–849. [Google Scholar]
- Ossendrijver A, Hoyng P, Schmitt D. 1996. Stochastic excitation and memory of the solar dynamo. A&A 313: 938–948. [Google Scholar]
- Ossendrijver MAJH. 2000. The dynamo effect of magnetic flux tubes. A&A 359: 1205–1210. [Google Scholar]
- Schatten KH, Scherrer PH, Svalgaard L, Wilcox JM. 1978. Using dynamo theory to predict the sunspot number during solar cycle 21. Geophys Res Lett 5(5): 411–414. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL005i005p00411. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Simard C, Charbonneau P. 2020. Grand Minima in a spherical non-kinematic α2 Ω mean-field dynamo model. J Space Weather Space Clim 10: 9. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020006. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Svalgaard L, Cliver EW, Kamide Y. 2005. Sunspot cycle 24: Smallest cycle in 100 years? Geophys Res Lett 32(1): L01104. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021664. [Google Scholar]
- Tobias SM. 1997. The solar cycle: parity interactions and amplitude modulation. A&A 322: 1007–1017. [Google Scholar]
- Tobias SM, Weiss NO, Kirk V. 1995. Chaotically modulated stellar dynamos. Mon Notices Royal Astron Soc 273(4): 1150–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/273.4.1150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tripathi B, Nandy D, Banerjee S. 2021. Stellar mid-life crisis: subcritical magnetic dynamos of solar-like stars and the breakdown of gyrochronology. Mon Notices Royal Astron Soc Lett 506(1): L50–L54. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slab035. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Usoskin IG. 2023. A history of solar activity over millennia. Liv Rev Sol Phys 20(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-023-00036-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Usoskin IG, Hulot G, Gallet Y, Roth R, Licht A, Joos F, Kovaltsov GA, Thébault E, Khokhlov A. 2014. Evidence for distinct modes of solar activity. A&A 562: L10. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423391. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Usoskin IG, Sokoloff D, Moss D. 2009. Grand Minima of solar activity and the mean-field dynamo. Sol Phys 254(2): 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9293-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Weiss NO, Tobias SM. 2016. Supermodulation of the Sun’s magnetic activity: the effects of symmetry changes. Mon Notices Royal Astron Soc 456: 2654–2661. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2769. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wilmot-Smith A, Nandy D, Hornig G, Martens P. 2006. A time delay model for solar and stellar dynamos. Astrophys. J. 652: 696–708. https://doi.org/10.1086/508013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshimura H. 1978. Nonlinear astrophysical dynamos: multiple-period dynamo wave oscillations and long-term modulations of the 22 year solar cycle. Astrophys J 226: 706–719. https://doi.org/10.1086/156653. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.