New formulation for the topside ionosphere and plasmasphere based on NeQuick | Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate

Open Access

Issue		J. Space Weather Space Clim. Volume 15, 2025


Article Number		48
Number of page(s)		10
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2025043
Published online		06 November 2025

Bilitza, D, M Pezzopane, Truhlik V, Altadill D, Reinisch BW, Pignalberi A. 2022. The international reference ionosphere model: a review and description of an ionospheric benchmark. Rev Geophys 60 (4): 2022RG000,792. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022RG000792. [Google Scholar]
Bilitza, D, Truhlik V, Yoshihara O, Moldwin MB. 2024. Development and improvement of the international reference ionosphere with special emphasis on the topside and extension to the plasmasphere. Ann Geophys 67 (4): SA443. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-9145. [Google Scholar]
Cai, Y, Yue X, Wang W, Zhang S-R, Liu H, et al. 2022. Altitude Extension of the NCAR-TIEGCM (TIEGCM-X) and Evaluation, Space Weather, 20 (11): e2022SW003,227. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003227. [Google Scholar]
Cherniak, I, Zakharenkova I. 2016. NeQuick and IRI-Plas model performance on topside electron content representation: Spaceborne GPS measurements. Radio Sci 51 (6): 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RS005905. [Google Scholar]
Cueto, M, Coïsson P, Radicella S, Herraiz M, L Ciraolo, Brunini C. 2007. Topside ionosphere and plasmasphere: Use of NeQuick in connection with Gallagher plasmasphere model. Adv Space Res 39 (5): 739–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.01.073. [Google Scholar]
Forsythe, VV, Bilitza D, Burrell AG, Dymond KF, Fritz BA, and SE McDonald. 2024. PyIRI: whole-globe approach to the international reference ionosphere modeling implemented in Python. Space Weather, 22 (4): e2023SW003,739. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003739. [Google Scholar]
Gallagher, DL, Craven PD, Comfort RH. 2000. Global core plasma model. J Geophys Res Space Phys 105 (A8): 18819–18833. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA000241. [Google Scholar]
Gulyaeva, T, Gallagher D. 2007. Comparison of two IRI electron-density plasmasphere extensions with GPS-TEC observations. Adv Space Res 39 (5): 744–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.01.064. [Google Scholar]
Hernández-Pajares, M, Juan JM, Sanz J, Orus R, Garcia-Rigo A, Feltens J, Komjathy A, Schaer SC, Krankowski A. 2009. The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998. J Geod 83: 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1. [Google Scholar]
International Telecommunication Union, Radiocommunication Sector. 2023. Recommendation ITU-R P.371–9: Choice of indices for long-term ionospheric predictions. In: Tech. Rep. ITU-R P.371–9. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-P.371-9-202308-I/en. [Google Scholar]
Jones, WB, Gallet RM. 1962. Representation of diurnal and geographic variations of ionospheric data by numerical methods. Telecommun. JV 29: 129–149. [Google Scholar]
Kashcheyev, A, Nava B. 2019. Validation of NeQuick 2 model topside ionosphere and plasmasphere electron content using COSMIC POD TEC. J Geophys Res Space Phys 124 (11): 9525–9536. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026971. [Google Scholar]
Nava, B, Coïsson P, Radicella S. 2008. A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 70 (15): 1856–1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.01.015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ozhogin, P, Tu J, Song P, Reinisch BW. 2012. Field-aligned distribution of the plasmaspheric electron density: An empirical model derived from the IMAGE RPI measurements. J Geophys Res Space Phys 117: A6. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017330. [Google Scholar]
Pezzopane, M, Pignalberi A, Nava B. 2023. On the low-latitude NeQuick topside ionosphere mismodelling: The role of parameters H0, g, and r. Adv Space Res 72 (4): 1224–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.04.014. [Google Scholar]
Pignalberi, A, Pezzopane M, Nava B. 2022. Optimizing the NeQuick topside scale height parameters through COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 radio occultation data. IEEE Geosci Rem Sens Lett 19: 1–5. 10.1109/LGRS.2021.3096657. [Google Scholar]
Pignalberi, A, Pezzopane M, Nava B, Coïsson P. 2020. On the link between the topside ionospheric effective scale height and the plasma ambipolar diffusion, theory and preliminary results. Scientific Rep 10: 17541. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73886-4. [Google Scholar]
Prol, FdS, Hernández-Pajares M, Camargo PdO, Muella MTdAH. 2018. Spatial and temporal features of the topside ionospheric electron density by a new model based on GPS radio occultation data. J Geophys Res Space Phys 123 (3): 2104–2115. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024936. [Google Scholar]
Prol, FS, Smirnov AG, Hoque MM, Shprits YY. 2022. Combined model of topside ionosphere and plasmasphere derived from radio-occultation and Van Allen Probes data. Scientific Rep 12: 9732. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13302-1. [Google Scholar]
Rawer, K. 1963. Meteorological and Astronomical Influences on Radio Wave Propagation. In: Meteorological and astronomical influences on radio wave propagation, B, LandmarkPergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 221–250. [Google Scholar]
Richmond, AD, Ridley EC, Roble RG. 1992. A thermosphere/ionosphere general circulation model with coupled electrodynamics. Geophys Res Lett 19 (6): 601–604. https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL00401. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Servan-Schreiber, N, Aggarwal M, Huang Y, Kang M, Shaker A, Bilitza D. 2025. Validation of the IRI-2020 model for the topside-plasmasphere using GNSS TEC measurements. Adv Space Res 75 (5): 4217–4229. [Google Scholar]
Smirnov, AG, Shprits YY, Prol FS, Lühr H, Berrendorf M, Zhelavskaya I, Xiong C. 2023. A novel neural network model of Earth’s topside ionosphere. Scientific Rep 13: 1303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28034-z. [Google Scholar]
Themens, DR, Jayachandran PT, Bilitza D, Erickson PJ, Häggström I, Lyashenko MV, Reid B, Varney RH, Pustovalova L. 2018. Topside electron density representations for middle and high latitudes: a topside parameterization for E-CHAIM Based On the NeQuick. J Geophys Res Space Physics, 123 (2): 1603–1617. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024817. [Google Scholar]
van den IJssel, J, Forte B, Montenbruck O. 2016. Impact of Swarm GPS receiver updates on POD performance. Earth Planet Space 68: 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0459-4. [Google Scholar]
Yizengaw, E, Moldwin M, Galvan D, Iijima B, Komjathy A, Mannucci A. 2008. Global plasmaspheric TEC and its relative contribution to GPS TEC. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 70 (11): 1541–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.04.022. [Google Scholar]
Zhelavskaya, IS, Shprits YY, Spasojević M. 2017. Empirical modeling of the plasmasphere dynamics using neural networks. J Geophys Res Space Phys 122 (11): 11227–11244. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024406. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.