Long-term trends of ionospheric electron density related to global warming | Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate

Open Access

Issue		J. Space Weather Space Clim. Volume 15, 2025


Article Number		56
Number of page(s)		12
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2025054
Published online		10 December 2025

Akmaev, RA, Fomichev VI, Zhu X. 2006. Impact of middle-atmospheric composition changes on greenhouse cooling in the upper atmosphere. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 68 (2006): 1879–1889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2006.03.008. [Google Scholar]
Bilitza, D, Reinisch B. 2008. International Reference Ionosphere 2007: Improvements and new parameters. J Adv Space Res 42 (4): 599–609. https://doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.07.048. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bremer, J. 1992. Ionospheric trends in mid-latitudes as a possible indicator of the atmospheric greenhouse effect. J Atmos Terr Phys 54: 1505–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(92)90157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bremer, J, Damboldt T, MielichJ, Suessmann P. 2012. Comparing long-term trends in the ionospheric F2-region with two different methods. J Atmos Terr Phys 77: 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.12.017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cai, Y, Yue X, Wang W, Zhang S, Liu L, Liu H, Wan W. 2019. Long‐term trend of topside ionospheric electron density derived from DMSP data during 1995–2017. J Geophys Res Space Phys 124: 10708–10727. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027522. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Clette, F. 2021. Is the F10.7 cm – Sunspot Number relation linear and stable? J Space Weather Space Clim 11: 2. https://doi.org/10.1051/SWSC/2020071. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Cnossen, I, Franzke C. 2014. The role of the Sun in long-term change in the F2 peak ionosphere: New insights from EEMD and numerical modelling. J Geophys Res Space Phys 119: 8610–8623. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020048. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cnossen, I, Richmond AD. 2008. Modeling the effects of changes in the Earth’s magnetic field from 1957 to 1997 on the ionospheric hmF2 and fof2 parameters. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 70: 1512–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.05.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Danilov, AD, Konstantinova AV. 2013. Behavior of the ionospheric F2 layer parameters at the boundary of centuries (2013) Critical frequency. Geomagn Aeron 53: 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793213030043. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Danilov, A. 2017. New results in studying foF2 trends. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys, 163: 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.04.002. [Google Scholar]
Donaldson, JK, Wellman TJ, Oliver WL. 2010. Long‐term change in thermospheric temperature above Saint Santin. J Geophys Res 115: A11305. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015346. [Google Scholar]
Dudok De Wit, T, Bruinsma S. 2017. The 30 cm radio flux as a solar proxy for thermosphere density modelling. J Space Weather Space Clim 7: A9. https://doi.org/10.1051/SWSC/2017008. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Elias, AG, Zossi de Artigas M, De Haro Barbas BF. 2010. Trends in the solar quiet geomagnetic field variation linked to the Earth’s magnetic field secular variation and increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases. J Geophys Res 115: A08316. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA015136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Elias, AG, Zossi BS, Duran T, Medina FD, Fagre M, De Haro Barbas BF. 2024. On the long-term stability of the association between foF2 and EUV solar proxies. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 265: 106363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106363. [Google Scholar]
Emmert, JT, Picone JM, Lean JL, Knowles SH. 2004. Global change in the thermosphere: Compelling evidence of a secular decrease in density. J Geophys Res 109: A02301. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010176. [Google Scholar]
Emmert, JT. 2015. Altitude and solar activity dependence of 1967–2005 thermospheric density trends derived from orbital drag. J Geophys Res Space Phys 120: 2940–2950. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021047. [Google Scholar]
Emmert, JT, Mannucci AJ, McDonald SE, Vergados P. 2017. Attribution of interminimum changes in global and hemispheric total electron content. J Geophys Res Space Phys 122: 2424–2439. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023680. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
IPCC. 2023. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Core Writing Team, Lee H , Romero J(Eds.),IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1–34. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.001. [Google Scholar]
Jakowski, N, Hoque MM, Mielich J. 2024. Long-term relationships of ionospheric electron density with solar activity. J Space Weather Space Clim 14: 24. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2024023. [Google Scholar]
Katsuda, S, Enoto T, Lommen AN, Mori K, Motizuki Y, et al. 2023. Long-term density trend in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere from occultations of the Crab Nebula with X-ray Astronomy Satellites. J Geophys Res Space Phys 128: e2022JA030797. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030797. [Google Scholar]
Keating, GM, Tolson RH, Bradford MS. 2000. Evidence of thermospheric effects long-term global decline in the Earth’s densities apparently related to anthropogenic effects. Geophys Res Lett 27 (10): 1523–1526. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL003771. [Google Scholar]
Laštovička, J, Mikhailov AV, Ulich T, Danilov AD. 2006. Long-term trends in foF2: A comparison of various methods. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 68: 1854–1870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2006.02.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Laštovička, J, Solomon SC, Qian L. 2012. Trends in the neutral and ionized upper atmosphere. Space Sci Rev 168: 113–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9799-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Laštovička, J, Urbar J, Kozubek M. 2017. Long-term trends in the total electron content. Geophys Res Lett 44: 8168–8172. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075063. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Laštovička, J, Jelínek Š. 2019. Problems in calculating long-term trends in the upper atmosphere. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 189: 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.04.011. [Google Scholar]
Laštovička, J, Burešová D. 2023. Relationships between foF2 and various solar activity proxies. Space Weather 21: e2022SW003359. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003359. [Google Scholar]
Laštovička, J. 2024. Dependence of long-term trends in foF2 at middle latitudes on different solar activity proxies. Adv Space Res 73 (1): 685–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.09.047. [Google Scholar]
Lean JL, Meier RR, Picone JM, Sassi F, Emmert JT, Richards PG. 2016. Ionospheric total electron content: Spatial patterns of variability. J Geophys Res Space Phys 121: 10367–10402. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023210. [Google Scholar]
Mielich, J, Bremer J. 2013. Long-term trends in the ionospheric F2 region with different solar activity indices. Ann Geophys 31: 291–303. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-291-2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mikhailov, AV, Marin D. 2001. An interpretation of the foF2 and hmF2 long-term trends in the framework of the geomagnetic control concept. Ann Geophys 19: 733–748. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-19-733-2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mursula, K, Qvick T, Holappa L, Asikainen T. 2022. Magnetic storms during the space age: occurrence and relation to varying solar activity. J Geophys Res Space Phys 127 (12): e2022JA030830. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030830. [Google Scholar]
Mursula, K, Pevtsov AA, Asikainen T, Tähtinen I, Yeates AR. 2024. Transition to a weaker Sun: Changes in the solar atmosphere during the decay of the Modern Maximum. A&A 685: A170. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449231. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Nava, B, Coisson P, Radicella SM. 2008. A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model. J Atmos Terr Phys 70 (15): 1856–1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.01.015. [Google Scholar]
Ogawa, Y, Motoba T, Buchert SC, Häggström I, Nozawa S. 2014. Upper atmosphere cooling over the past 33 years. Geophys Res Lett 41: 5629–5635. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060591. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Oliver, WL, Zhang SR, Goncharenko LP. 2013. Is thermospheric global cooling caused by gravity waves? J Geophys Res Space Phys 118: 3898–3908. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Parker, WE, Brown MK, Linares R. 2025. Greenhouse gases reduce the satellite carrying capacity of low Earth orbit. Nat Sustain 8: 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01512-0. [Google Scholar]
Ptitsyna, NG, Demina IM. 2023. Influence of the Gleissberg Cycle on Variations of the 11-Year Cycle of Solar Activity in 1700–2021. Geomagn Aeron 63 (3): 248–260. [Google Scholar]
Qian, L, Roble RG, Solomon SC, Kane TJ. 2006. Calculated and observed climate change in the thermosphere, and a prediction for solar cycle 24. Geophys Res Lett 33: L23705. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027185. [Google Scholar]
Qian, L, Burns AG, Solomon SC, Roble RG. 2009. The effect of carbon dioxide cooling on trends in the F2-layer ionosphere. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 71: 1592–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.03.006. [Google Scholar]
Reinisch, BW, Galkin IA. 2011. Global ionospheric radio observatory (GIRO). Earth Planets Space 63: 377–381. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.03.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rishbeth, H. 1990. A greenhouse effect in the ionosphere? Planet Space Sci 38: 945–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(90)90061. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rishbeth, H. 1997. Long-term changes in the ionosphere. Adv Space Res 20: 2149–2155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00607-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rishbeth, H, Roble RG. 1992. Cooling of the upper atmosphere by enhanced greenhouse gases – modelling of the thermosphere. Planet Space Sci 40: 1011–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(92)90141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Roble, RG, Dickinson RE. 1989. How will changes in carbon dioxide and methane modify the mean structure of the mesosphere and thermosphere? Geophys Res Lett 16: 1441–1444. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL016i012p01441. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sivakandan, M, Mielich J, Renkwitz T, Chau JL, Jaen J, Laštovička J. 2023. Long-term variations and residual trends in the E, F, and sporadic E (Es) layer over Juliusruh, Europe. J Geophys Res Space Phys 128: e2022JA031097. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA031097. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Solomon, SC, Qian L, Roble RG. 2015. New 3-D simulations of climate change in the thermosphere. J Geophys Res Space Phys 120: 2183–2193. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020886. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Tan Jun Rios, MG, Borries C, Liu H, Mielich J. 2025. Long-term changes in the dependence of NmF2 on solar flux at Juliusruh. Ann Geophys 43: 73–89. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-73-2025. [Google Scholar]
Tapping, KF, Valdés JJ. 2011. Did the Sun change its behaviour during the decline of Cycle 23 and Into Cycle 24? Solar Phys 272: 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9827-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ulich, T, Clilverd MA, Rishbeth H. 2003. Determining long-term change in the ionosphere. EoS 84 (52): 581–585. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003EO520002. [Google Scholar]
Zhang, SR, Holt J, Kurdzo J. 2011. Millstone Hill ISR observations of upper atmospheric long-term changes: height dependency. J Geophys Res 116: A00H05. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA016414. [Google Scholar]
Zossi, BS, Medina FD, Duran T, Elias AG. 2025a. Selecting the best solar EUV proxy for long-term timescale applications. Adv Space Res 75 (1): 856–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASR.2024.07.023. [Google Scholar]
Zossi, BS, Medina FD, Duran T, de Haro Barbas BF, Elias AG. 2025b. Re-visiting sunspot number as an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) proxy for ionospheric F2 critical frequency. Ann Geophys 43: 91–98. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-91-2025. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.