| Issue |
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 15, 2025
Topical Issue - Severe space weather events of May 2024 and their impacts
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 57 | |
| Number of page(s) | 27 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2025045 | |
| Published online | 11 December 2025 | |
- Alfonsi, L, Spogli L, De Franceschi G, Romano V, Aquino M, Dodson A, Mitchell CN. 2011. Bipolar climatology of GPS ionospheric scintillation at solar minimum. Radio Sci 46 (3): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010RS004571. [Google Scholar]
- Andalsvik, YL, Jacobsen KS. 2014. Observed high-latitude GNSS disturbances during a less-than-minor geomagnetic storm. Radio Sci 49 (12): 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RS005418. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Basu, S, Basu S, MacKenzie E, Coley WR, Sharber JR, Hoegy WR. 1990. Plasma structuring by the gradient drift instability at high latitudes and comparison with velocity shear driven processes. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 95 (A6): 7799–7818. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA095iA06p07799. [Google Scholar]
- Basu, S, Weber EJ, Bullett TW, Keskinen MJ, MacKenzie E, Doherty P, Sheehan R, Kuenzler H, Ning P, Bongiolatti J. 1998. Characteristics of plasma structuring in the cusp/cleft region at Svalbard. Radio Sci 33 (6): 1885–1899. https://doi.org/10.1029/98RS01597. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Buonsanto, M. 1999. Ionospheric storms – a review. Space Sci Rev 88 (3): 563–601. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005107532631. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Burston, R, Astin I, Mitchell C, Alfonsi L, Pedersen T, Skone S. 2010.. Turbulent times in the northern polar ionosphere? J Geophys Res: Space Phys 115: A4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014813. [Google Scholar]
- Buschmann, LM, Asamura K, Clausen LBN, Jin Y, Kojima H, et al.. 2025. Plasma structuring within an expanded polar cap and cusp studied with the SS-520–3 sounding rocket, Earth Planets Space, 77 (1): 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-025-02189-7. [Google Scholar]
- Carlson, HC, Oksavik K, Moen J. 2008. On a new process for cusp irregularity production. Ann Geophys 26 (9): 2871–2885. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-26-2871-2008. [Google Scholar]
- Carlson, HC, Pedersen T, Basu S, Keskinen M, Moen J. 2007. Case for a new process, not mechanism, for cusp irregularity production. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 112: A11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012384. [Google Scholar]
- Carmo, CS, Dai L, Wrasse CM, Barros D, Takahashi H, Figueiredo CAOB, Wang C, Li H, Liu Z. 2024. Ionospheric response to the extreme 2024 Mother’s Day geomagnetic storm over the latin American sector. Space Weather 22 (12): e2024SW004,054. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW004054. [Google Scholar]
- Chisham, G, Lester M, Milan SE, Freeman MP, Bristow WA, et al. 2007. A decade of the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN): Scientific achievements, new techniques and future directions. Surv Geophys 28 (1): 33–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-007-9017-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Clausen, LBN, Moen JI, Hosokawa K, Holmes JM. 2016. GPS scintillations in the high latitudes during periods of dayside and nightside reconnection. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 121 (4): 3293–3309. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022199. [Google Scholar]
- Danilov, AD, Morozova LD. 1985. Ionospheric storms in the F2 region – Morphology and physics (Review). Geomagn Aeron 25: 705–721. [Google Scholar]
- Emmert, JT, Richmond AD, Drob DP. 2010. A computationally compact representation of Magnetic-Apex and Quasi-Dipole coordinates with smooth base vectors. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 115: A8. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015326. [Google Scholar]
- Enengl, F, Kotova D, Jin Y, Clausen LB, Miloch WJ. 2023. Ionospheric plasma structuring in relation to auroral particle precipitation. J Space Weather Space Clim 13: 1. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2022038. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Enengl, F, Spogli L, Kotova D, Jin Y, Oksavik K, Partamies N, Miloch WJ. 2024. Investigation of ionospheric small-scale plasma structures associated with particle precipitation. Space Weather 22 (1): e2023SW003,605. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003605. [Google Scholar]
- Engebretson, MJ, Hughes WJ, Alford JL, Zesta E, Cahill LJ, Jr., Arnoldy RL, Reeves GD. 1995. Magnetometer array for cusp and cleft studies observations of the spatial extent of broadband ULF magnetic pulsations at cusp/cleft latitudes. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 100 (A10): 19371–19386. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JA00768. [Google Scholar]
- Evans, JS, Correira J, Lumpe JD, Eastes RW, Gan Q, et al. 2024. GOLD Observations of the thermospheric response to the 10–12 May 2024 gannon superstorm. Geophys Res Lett 51 (16): e2024GL110,506. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110506. [Google Scholar]
- Follestad, AF, Clausen LBN, Moen JI, Jacobsen KS. 2021. Latitudinal, diurnal, and seasonal variations in the accuracy of an RTK positioning system and its relationship with ionospheric irregularities. Space Weather 19 (6): e2020SW002,625. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002625. [Google Scholar]
- Frodge, SL, Deloach SR, Remondi B, Lapucha D, Barker RA. 1994. Real-time on-the-fly kinematic GPS system results. Navigation 41 (2): 175–186. [Google Scholar]
- Fæhn Follestad, A, Herlingshaw K, Ghadjari H, Knudsen DJ, McWilliams KA, Moen JI, Spicher A, Wu J, and Oksavik K. 2020. Dayside field-aligned current impacts on ionospheric irregularities. Geophys Res Lett 47 (11): e2019GL086,722. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086722. [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalez-Esparza, JA, Sanchez-Garcia E, Sergeeva M, Corona-Romero P, Gonzalez-Mendez LX, et al. 2024. The Mother’s Day geomagnetic storm on 10 May 2024: aurora observations and low latitude space weather effects in Mexico. Space Weather 22 (11): e2024SW004,111. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW004111. [Google Scholar]
- Grandin, M, Bruus E, Ledvina VE, Partamies N, Barthelemy M, et al. 2024. The gannon storm: citizen science observations during the geomagnetic superstorm of 10 May 2024Geosci Commun 7 (4): 297–316. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-297-2024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Greenwald, RA, Baker KB, Dudeney JR, Pinnock M, Jones TB, et al. 1995. DARN/SuperDARN. Space Sci Rev 71 (1): 761–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751350. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hajra, R, Tsurutani BT, Lakhina GS, Lu Q, Du A. 2024. Interplanetary causes and impacts of the 2024 May superstorm on the geosphere: an overview. Astrophys J 974 (2): 264. https://doi.org/10.3847/15380-4357/ad7462. [Google Scholar]
- Hayakawa, H, Ebihara Y, Mishev A, Koldobskiy S, Kusano K, et al.. 2025. The solar and geomagnetic storms in 2024 May: a flash data report. Astrophys J 979 (1): 49. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9335. [Google Scholar]
- Horvath, I, Lovell BC. 2015. Positive and negative ionospheric storms occurring during the 15 May 2005 geomagnetic superstorm. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 120 (9): 7822–7837. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021206. [Google Scholar]
- Jacobsen, KS.. 2014. The impact of different sampling rates and calculation time intervals on ROTI values. J Space Weather Space Clim 4, A33. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014031. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobsen, KS, Andalsvik YL. 2016. Overview of the 2015 St. Patricks day storm and its consequences for RTK and PPP positioning in Norway. J Space Weather Space Clim 6: A9. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2016004. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobsen KS, Beeck S, Koskimaa P, Watson C. 2025. GNSS Scintillation data from Finland, Norway, Greenland and Canada for the geomagnetic storm of May 2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15045918. [Google Scholar]
- Jacobsen, KS, Dähnn M. 2014. Statistics of ionospheric disturbances and their correlation with GNSS positioning errors at high latitudes. J Space Weather Space Clim 4: A27. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014024. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobsen, KS, Schäfer S. 2012. Observed effects of a geomagnetic storm on an RTK positioning network at high latitudes. J Space Weather Space Clim 2: A13. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2012013. [Google Scholar]
- Jacobsen, KS, Sokolova N, Ouassou M, Solberg AM. 2023. Study of time- and distance-dependent degradations of network RTK performance at high latitudes in Norway. SN Appl Sci 5 (5): 126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05325-8. [Google Scholar]
- Jain, A, Trivedi R, Jain S, Choudhary R. 2025. Effects of the super intense geomagnetic storm on 10–11 May, 2024 on total electron content at Bhopal. Adv Space Res 75 (1): 953–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.09.029. [Google Scholar]
- Jayachandran, PT, Langley RB, MacDougall JW, Mushini SC, Pokhotelov D, et al. 2009. Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network (CHAIN). Radio Sci 44 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RS004046. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, Y, Kotova D, Clausen LBN, Miloch WJ. 2025. Significant plasma density depletion from high-to mid-latitude ionosphere during the super storm in May 2024. Geophys Res Lett 52 (5): e2024GL113,997. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL113997. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, Y, Moen JI, Miloch WJ. 2014. GPS scintillation effects associated with polar cap patches and substorm auroral activity: Direct comparison. J Space Weather Space Clim 4: A23. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014019. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Jin, Y, Moen JI, Miloch WJ. 2015. On the collocation of the cusp aurora and the GPS phase scintillation: A statistical study. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 120 (10): 9176–9191. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021449. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, Y, Moen JI, Miloch WJ, Clausen LBN, Oksavik K. 2016. Statistical study of the GNSS phase scintillation associated with two types of auroral blobs. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 121 (5): 4679–4697. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022613. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, Y, Moen JI, Oksavik K, Spicher A, Clausen LB, Miloch WJ. 2017. GPS scintillations associated with cusp dynamics and polar cap patches. J Space Weather Space Clim 7: A23. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017022. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Juusola, L, Viljanen A, Partamies N, Vanhamäki H, Kellinsalmi M, Walker S. 2023. Three principal components describe the spatiotemporal development of mesoscale ionospheric equivalent currents around substorm onsets. Ann Geophys 41: 483–510. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-483-2023. [Google Scholar]
- Karan, DK, Martinis CR, Daniell RE, Eastes RW, Wang W, McClintock WE, Michell RG, England S. 2024. GOLD observations of the merging of the southern crest of the equatorial ionization anomaly and aurora during the 10 and 11 May 2024 Mother’s Day super geomagnetic storm. Geophys Res Lett 51 (15): e2024GL110,632. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110632. [Google Scholar]
- Keskinen, MJ, Mitchell HG, JA Fedder, Satyanarayana P, Zalesak ST, Huba JD. 1988. Nonlinear evolution of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in the high-latitude ionosphere. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 93 (A1): 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA093iA01p00137. [Google Scholar]
- Kintner, PM, Ledvina BM, de Paula ER. 2007. GPS and ionospheric scintillations. Space Weather 5 (9): S09003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006SW000260. [Google Scholar]
- Kotova, DS, Sinevich AA, Chernyshov AA, Chugunin DV, Jin Y, Miloch WJ. 2025. Strong turbulent flow in the subauroral region in the Antarctic can deteriorate satellite-based navigation signals. Sci Rep 15 (1): 3458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86960-6. [Google Scholar]
- Kvammen, A, Spicher A, Zettergren M, Huyghebaert D, Rexer T, Gustavsson B, Vierinen J. 2025. Conditions for the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in the polar ionosphere. Geophys Res Lett 52 (5): e2025GL114,621. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL114621. [Google Scholar]
- Kwak, YS, Kim JH, Kim S, Miyashita Y, Yang T, et al. 2024. Observational overview of the May 2024 G5-Level geomagnetic storm: From solar eruptions to terrestrial consequences. J Astron Space Sci 41 (3): 171–194. https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2024.41.3.171. [Google Scholar]
- Landau, H, Vollath U, Chen X. 2002. Virtual reference station systems. J Global Position Syst 1: 137–143. https://doi.org/10.5081/jgps.1.2.137. [Google Scholar]
- Lazzús, J, Salfate I. 2024. Report on the effects of the May 2024 Mother’s day geomagnetic storm observed from Chile. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 261: 106304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106304. [Google Scholar]
- Lockwood, M, Owens MJ, Brown W, Vázquez M. 2025. The 2024 May event in the context of auroral activity over the past 375 yr. Mon Not R Astron Soc 540 (4): 3596–3624. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf827. [Google Scholar]
- Makarevich, RA, Crowley G, Azeem I, Ngwira C, Forsythe VV. 2021. Auroral E-region as a source region for ionospheric scintillation. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 126 (5): e2021JA029,212. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029212. [Google Scholar]
- Mann, IR, Milling DK, Rae IJ, Ozeke LG, Kale A, et al. 2008. The upgraded CARISMA magnetometer array in the THEMIS era. Space Sci Rev 141 (1–4): 413–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9457-6. [Google Scholar]
- Mavromichalaki, H, Papailiou M-C, Livada M, Gerontidou M, Paschalis P, et al. 2024. Unusual forbush decreases and geomagnetic storms on 24 March, 2024 and 11 May, 2024. Atmosphere 15 (9): 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15091033. [Google Scholar]
- McCaffrey, AM, Jayachandran PT. 2019. Determination of the refractive contribution to GPS phase “Scintillation”. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 124 (2): 1454–1469. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025759. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Miloch, WJ, Kotova DS, Jin Y. 2024. Ionospheric plasma irregularities over Dronning Maud Land in Antarctica and associated space weather effects. Fund Plasma Phys 12: 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpp.2024.100076. [Google Scholar]
- Mlynczak, MG, Hunt LA, Nowak N, Marshall BT, Mertens CJ. 2024. Global thermospheric infrared response to the Mother’s Day weekend extreme storm of 2024. Geophys Res Lett 51 (15): e2024GL110,701. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110701. [Google Scholar]
- Moen, J, Oksavik K, Abe T, Lester M, Saito Y, Bekkeng TA, Jacobsen KS. 2012. First in-situ measurements of HF radar echoing targets. Geophys Res Lett 39 (7): L07104. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051407. [Google Scholar]
- Moen, J, Oksavik K, Alfonsi L, Daabakk Y, Romano V, Spogli L. 2013. Space weather challenges of the polar cap ionosphere. J Space Weather Space Clim 3: A02. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2013025. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Nishitani, N, Ruohoniemi JM, Lester M, Baker JBH, Koustov AV, et al. 2019. Review of the accomplishments of mid-latitude Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) HF radars. Prog Earth Planet Sci 6 (1): 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-019-0270-5. [Google Scholar]
- Oksavik, K, Barth VL, Moen J, Lester M. 2010. On the entry and transit of high-density plasma across the polar cap. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 115: A12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015817. [Google Scholar]
- Oksavik, K, Moen J, Lester M, Bekkeng TA, Bekkeng JK. 2012. In situ measurements of plasma irregularity growth in the cusp ionosphere. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 117: A11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017835. [Google Scholar]
- Oksavik, K, van der Meeren C, Lorentzen DA, Baddeley LJ, Moen J. 2015. Scintillation and loss of signal lock from poleward moving auroral forms in the cusp ionosphere. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 120 (10): 9161–9175. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021528. [Google Scholar]
- Paziewski, J, Høeg P, Sieradzki R, Jin Y, Jarmolowski W, et al. 2022. The implications of ionospheric disturbances for precise GNSS positioning in Greenland. J Space Weather Space Clim 12: 33. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2022029. [Google Scholar]
- Pierrard, V, Winant A, Botek E, Péters de Bonhome M. 2024. The Mother’s Day solar storm of 11 May 2024 and its effect on Earth’s radiation belts. Universe 10 (10): 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10100391. [Google Scholar]
- Prikryl, P, Ghoddousi-Fard R, Kunduri BSR, Thomas EG, Coster AJ, Jayachandran PT, Spanswick E, Danskin DW. 2013. GPS phase scintillation and proxy index at high latitudes during a moderate geomagnetic storm. Ann Geophys 31 (5): 805–816. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-805-2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Prikryl, P, Ghoddousi-Fard R, Weygand JM, Viljanen A, Connors M, et al. 2016. GPS phase scintillation at high latitudes during the geomagnetic storm of 17–18 March, 2015. J Geophys Res: Space Phys, 121 (10): 10448–10465. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023171. [Google Scholar]
- Prikryl, P, Gillies RG, Themens DR, Weygand JM, Thomas EG, Chakraborty S. 2022. Multi-instrument observations of polar cap patches and traveling ionospheric disturbances generated by solar wind Alfvén waves coupling to the dayside magnetosphere. Ann Geophys 40 (6): 619–639. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-619-2022. [Google Scholar]
- Prikryl, P, Jayachandran PT, Mushini SC, Richardson IG. 2012. Toward the probabilistic forecasting of high-latitude GPS phase scintillation. Space Weather 10 (8): S08005. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012SW000800. [Google Scholar]
- Prikryl, P, Weygand J, Ghoddousi-Fard R, Jayachandran P, Themens D, McCaffrey A, Kunduri B, Nikitina L. 2021. Temporal and spatial variations of GPS TEC and phase during auroral substorms and breakups. Polar Sci 28: 100602. SuperDARN / Studies of Geospace Dynamics – Today and Future. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2020.100602. [Google Scholar]
- Richmond, AD. 1995. Ionospheric electrodynamics using magnetic apex coordinates. J Geomagn Geoelectr 47 (2): 191–212. https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.47.191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rizos, C. 2003. Network RTK research and implementation – a geodetic perspective. J Global Position Syst 1 (2): 144–150. [Google Scholar]
- Russell, CT, Chi PJ, Dearborn DJ, Ge YS, Kuo-Tiong B, Means JD, Pierce DR, Rowe KM, Snare RC. 2008. THEMIS ground-based magnetometers. Space Sci Rev 141 (1): 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9337-0. [Google Scholar]
- Skjæveland, AH, Kotova DS, Miloch WJ. 2021. Case studies of ionospheric plasma irregularities over Queen Maud Land, Antarctica. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 126 (10): e2021JA029,963. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029963. [Google Scholar]
- Sokolova, N, Morrison A, Jacobsen KS. 2023. High latitude ionospheric gradient observation results from a multi-scale network. Sensors 23 (4): 2062. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042062. [Google Scholar]
- Spicher, A, Deshpande K, Jin Y, Oksavik K, Zettergren MD, LBN Clausen, Moen JI, Hairston MR, Baddeley L. 2020. On the production of ionospheric irregularities via Kelvin-Helmholtz instability associated with cusp flow channels. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 125 (6): e2019JA027,734. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027734. [Google Scholar]
- Spogli, L, Alberti T, Bagiacchi P, Cafarella L, Cesaroni C, et al. 2024. The effects of the May 2024 Mother’s Day superstorm over the Mediterranean sector: from data to public communication. Ann Geophys 67 (2): PA218. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-9117. [Google Scholar]
- Spogli, L, Cesaroni C, Di Mauro D, Pezzopane M, Alfonsi L, et al. 2016. Formation of ionospheric irregularities over Southeast Asia during the 2015 St. Patrick’s Day storm. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 121 (12): 12211–12233. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023222. [Google Scholar]
- SuperDARN Data Analysis Working Group, Thomas E, Reimer A, Bland E, Burrell A, et al. 2022. SuperDARN Radar Software Toolkit (RST) 5.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7467337. [Google Scholar]
- Themens, DR, Elvidge S, McCaffrey A, Jayachandran PT, Coster A, et al. 2024. The high latitude ionospheric response to the major May 2024 geomagnetic storm: A synoptic view. Geophys Res Lett 51 (19): e2024GL111,677. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL111677. [Google Scholar]
- Tulasi Ram, S, Veenadhari B, Dimri AP, Bulusu J, Bagiya M, et al. 2024. Super-intense geomagnetic storm on 10–11 May 2024: Possible mechanisms and impacts. Space Weather 22 (12): e2024SW004,126. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW004126. [Google Scholar]
- van der Meeren C, Laundal KM, Burrell AG, Lamarche LL, Starr G, Reimer AS, Morschhauser A, Michaelis I, Klenzing J. 2025. aburrell/apexpy: ApexPy Version 2.1.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14610316. [Google Scholar]
- van der Meeren, C, Oksavik K, Lorentzen D, Moen JI, Romano V. 2014. GPS scintillation and irregularities at the front of an ionization tongue in the nightside polar ionosphere. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 119 (10): 8624–8636. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020114. [Google Scholar]
- van der Meeren, C, Oksavik K, Lorentzen DA, Rietveld MT, Clausen LBN. 2015. Severe and localized GNSS scintillation at the poleward edge of the nightside auroral oval during intense substorm aurora. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 120 (12): 10607–10621. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021819. [Google Scholar]
- Van Dierendonck, AJ. 1999. Eye on the ionosphere: Measuring ionospheric scintillation effects from GPS Signals. GPS Solu 2 (4): 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012769. [Google Scholar]
- Van Dierendonck, AJ, Klobuchar J, Hua Q. 1993. Ionospheric scintillation monitoring using commercial single frequency C/A code receivers. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 1993), Salt Lake City, UT, pp. 1333–1342. [Google Scholar]
- Vanhamäki, H, Juusola L. 2020. Introduction to spherical elementary current systems. In: Ionospheric Multi-Spacecraft Analysis Tools. ISSI Scientific Report Series 17, pp. 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26732-2. [Google Scholar]
- Walker, SJ, Laundal KM, Reistad JP, Hatch SM, Ohma A, Gjerloev J. 2024. The ionospheric leg of the substorm current wedge: Combining iridium and ground magnetometers. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 129: e2024JA032,414. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA032414. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, W, Lei J, Burns AG, Solomon SC, Wiltberger M, Xu J, Zhang Y, Paxton L, Coster A. 2010. Ionospheric response to the initial phase of geomagnetic storms: Common features. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 115: A7. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014461. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y, Jayachandran PT, Ma Y-Z, Zhang Q-H, Xing Z-Y, Ruohoniemi JM, Shepherd SG, Lester M. 2022. Dependencies of GPS scintillation indices on the ionospheric plasma drift and rate of change of TEC around the dawn sector of the polar ionosphere. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 127 (11): e2022JA030,870. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030870. [Google Scholar]
- Weber, EJ, Klobuchar JA, Buchau J, Carlson HC, Livingston RC, de la Beaujardiere O, McCready M, Moore JG, Bishop GJ. 1986. Polar cap F layer patches: Structure and dynamics. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 91 (A11): 12121–12129. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA091iA11p12121. [Google Scholar]
- Weygand, JM, Amm O, Viljanen A, Angelopoulos V, Murr D, Engebretson MJ, Gleisner H, Mann I. 2011. Application and validation of the spherical elementary currents systems technique for deriving ionospheric equivalent currents with the North American and Greenland ground magnetometer arrays. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 116: A3. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA016177. [Google Scholar]
- Weygand, JM, Wing S. 2016. Comparison of DMSP and SECS region-1 and region-2 ionospheric current boundary. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 143–144: 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2016.03.002. [Google Scholar]
- Wübbena, G, Bagge A, Seeber G, Boder V, Hankemeier P. 1996. Reducing distance dependent errors for real-time precise DGPS applications by establishing reference station networks. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 1996), Kansas City, MO, USA, pp. 1845–1852. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Z, Morton YTJ, Zakharenkova I, Cherniak I, Song S, Li W. 2020. Global view of ionospheric disturbance impacts on kinematic GPS positioning solutions during the 2015 St. Patrick’s Day storm. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 125 (7): e2019JA027,681. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027681. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.
