A new approach to modelling space weather impact on the aerodynamic drag of LEO objects | Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate

Open Access

Issue		J. Space Weather Space Clim. Volume 16, 2026


Article Number		10
Number of page(s)		18
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2026006
Published online		21 April 2026

Alessi, EM, Schettino G, Rossi A, Valsecchi GB. 2018. Solar radiation pressure resonances in Low Earth Orbits, Mon Not R Astron Soc 473 (2): 2407–2414. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2507. [Google Scholar]
Baker, DN. 2002. The occurrence of operational anomalies in spacecraft and their relationship to space weather. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 28 (6): 2007–2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/27.902228. [Google Scholar]
Baruah, Y, Roy S, Sinha S, Palmerio E, Pal S, et al. 2024. The loss of the Starlink satellites in February 2022: How moderate geomagnetic storms can adversely affect assets in Low-Earth orbit. Space Weather 22 (4): e2023SW003716. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003716. [Google Scholar]
Bate, RR, Mueller DD, White JE. 1971. Fundamentals of astrodynamics. Courier Dover Publications, New York. https://cmp.felk.cvut.cz/~kukelova/pajdla/Bate,%20Mueller,%20and%20White%20-%20Fundamentals%20of%20Astrodynamics.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Berger, TE, Dominique M, Lucas G, Pilinski M, Ray V, et al. 2023. The thermosphere is a drag: The 2022 Starlink incident and the threat of geomagnetic storms to low earth orbit space operations. Space Weather 21, e2022SW003330. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003330. [Google Scholar]
Bernstein, V, Pilinski M. 2022. Drag coefficient constraints for space weather observations in the upper thermosphere. Space Weather, 20: e2021SW002977. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002977. [Google Scholar]
Biesbroek, R, Innocenti L, Wolahan A, Serrano SM. 2017. e. Deorbit-ESA’s active debris removal mission. In: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Space Debris (Vol. 10), April, ESA Space Debris Office. https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/proceedings/sdc7/paper/1053/SDC7-paper1053.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Biesbroek, R, Aziz S, Wolahan A, Cipolla SF, Richard-Noca M,et al. 2021. The clearspace-1 mission: ESA and clearspace team up to remove debris. In: Proc. 8th Eur. Conf. Sp. Debris, April, pp. 1–3. https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/proceedings/sdc8/paper/320/SDC8-paper320.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Borelli, G, Gaias G, Colombo C. 2023. Rendezvous and proximity operations design of an active debris removal service to a large constellation fleet. Acta Astronautica , 205: 33–46. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.01.021. [Google Scholar]
Bruinsma, S, Dudok de Wit T, Fuller-Rowell T, Garcia-Sage K, Mehta P, et al. 2023. Thermosphere and satellite drag. Adv Space Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.05.011. [Google Scholar]
Chen, GM, Xu J, Wang W, Lei J, Burns AG. 2012. A comparison of the effects of CIR-and CME-induced geomagnetic activity on thermospheric densities and spacecraft orbits: Case studies. J Geophys Res Space Physics 117 (A8): A08315. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017782. [Google Scholar]
Chobotov, VA. 2002. Orbital mechanics. AIAA. https://doi.org/10.2514/4.862250. [Google Scholar]
Coll, GT, Webster GK, Pankiewicz OK, Schlee KL, Aranyos TJ, et al. 2020. NASA’s Exploration and In-Space Services (NExIS) Division OSAM-1 Propellant Transfer Subsystem Progress 2020. In: 2020 AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum, August. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205004116. [Google Scholar]
Colombo, C, McInnes C. 2010. Orbital dynamics of earth-orbiting’ smart dust’ spacecraft under the effects of solar radiation pressure and aerodynamic drag. In: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 7656. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-7656. [Google Scholar]
Curtis, HD. 2020. Orbital mechanics for engineering students: Revised Reprint. Butterworth-Heinemann. https://shop.elsevier.com/books/orbital-mechanics-for-engineering-students/curtis/978-0-12-824025-0. [Google Scholar]
Dang, T, Li X, Luo B, Li R, Zhang B, et al. 2022. Unveiling the space weather during the Starlink satellites destruction event on 4 February 2022. Space Weather 20, e2022SW003152. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003152. [Google Scholar]
David, L. 2009. Orbital debris cleanup takes center stage. SPACE.com. 7 October 2009. Available at: https://www.space.com/7377-orbital-debris-cleanup-takes-center-stage.html (Accessed: 10 Sept. 2023). [Google Scholar]
Denton, MH, Borovsky JE, Skoug, MF Thomsen, Lavraud B, et al. 2006. Geomagnetic storms driven by ICME-and CIR-dominated solar wind. J Geophys Res Space Physics 111, A7. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA017782. [Google Scholar]
Doornbos, E, Bruinsma S, Pilinski MD, Bowman B. 2013. The need for a standard for satellite drag computation to improve consistency between thermosphere density models and data sets. In: 6th European Conference on Space Debris, 723, p. 71. https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/proceedings/sdc6/paper/130/SDC6-paper130.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Doornbos, E. 2012. Thermospheric density and wind determination from satellite dynamics. In: Theses, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25129-0. [Google Scholar]
Doornbos, E, Klinkrad H. 2006. Modelling of space weather effects on satellite drag. Adv Space Res 37 (6): 1229–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.097. [Google Scholar]
Dreyer, H, Scharring S, Rodmann J, Riede W, Bamann C, et al. 2021. Future improvements in conjunction assessment and collision avoidance using a combined laser tracking/nudging network. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Space Debris, virtual conference, 20–23 April 2021, Paper 153, ESA Space Debris Office, Darmstadt, Germany. https://elib.dlr.de/142042/. [Google Scholar]
ENISA. 2025. Space threat landscape. Report 2025. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). https://www.enisa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2025-03/Space_Threat_Landscape_Report_fin.pdf. [Google Scholar]
ESA. 2025. ESA’s Annual Space Environment Report. GEN-DB-LOG-00288-OPS-SD. ESA Space Debris Office, Germany. https://www.sdo.esoc.esa.int/environment_report/Space_Environment_Report_latest.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Fernandez-Gomez, I, Kodikara T, Borries C, Forootan E, Goss A, et al. 2022. Improving estimates of the ionosphere during geomagnetic storm conditions through assimilation of thermospheric mass density. Earth Planets Space 74: 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01678-3. [Google Scholar]
Fiedler, H, Hackel S. 2012. The 25-year guideline: A new approach for practice. In: Proceedings of the 63rd International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2012), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, IAC-12–A6.9.4, International Astronautical Federation, Paris. https://elib.dlr.de/146871/. [Google Scholar]
Forootan, E, Kosary M, Farzaneh S, Kodikara T, Vielberg K, et al. 2022. Forecasting global and multi-level thermospheric neutral density and ionospheric electron content by tuning models against satellite-based accelerometer measurements. Sci Rep 12: 2095. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05952-y. [Google Scholar]
Fujii, G, Iizuka S, Belle C, Mukoyuki M. 2021. The world’s first commercial debris removal demonstration mission. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Small Satellite Conference, online, 6–11 August 2021, Utah State University, Small Satellite Conference, Logan, UT. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5019&context=smallsat. [Google Scholar]
Gaposchkin, EM, Coster AJ. 1988. Analysis of satellite drag. Lincoln Lab. J. 1: 203–224. https://archive.ll.mit.edu/publications/journal/pdf/vol01_no2/1.2.6.satellitedrag.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Hayakawa, H, Ebihara Y, Mishev A, Koldobskiy S, Kusano K, et al. 2025. The Solar and Geomagnetic Storms in May 2024: A Flash Data Report. Astrophys J 979 (1). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9335. [Google Scholar]
Hladczuk, NA, van den IJssel J, Kodikara T, Siemes C, Visser P. 2024. GRACE-FO radiation pressure modelling for accurate density and crosswind retrieval. Adv Space Res 73 (5): 2355–2373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.12.059. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Holzinger, MJ, Jah MK. 2018. Challenges and potential in space domain awareness. J Guid Control Dynam 41 (1): 15–18. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003483. [Google Scholar]
Huang, S, Colombo C, Alessi EM, Wang Y, Hou Z. 2022. Low-thrust de-orbiting from Low Earth Orbit through natural perturbations. Acta Astron 195: 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.02.017. [Google Scholar]
Jackson, DR, Bruinsma S, Negrin S, Stolle C, Budd CJ, et al. 2020. The Space Weather Atmosphere Models and Indices (SWAMI) project: Overview and first results. J Space Weather Space Clim 10: 18. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020019. [Google Scholar]
Jakhu, RS. 2009. Iridium-Cosmos collision and its implications for space operations. In: Yearbook on Space Policy 2008/2009, Schrogl KU, et al. (Ed.), Springer, Wien, New York, pp. 254–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0318-0_10. [Google Scholar]
Kessler DJ, Cour-Palais BG. 1978. Collision frequency of artificial satellites: The creation of a debris belt. J Geophys Res 83 (A6): 2637–2646. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA083iA06p02637. [Google Scholar]
Kessler, DJ, Johnson NL, Liou JC, Matney M. 2010.. The Kessler syndrome: implications to future space operations. Adv Astro Sci 137 (8). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=227655e022441d1379dfdc395173ed2e776d54ee. [Google Scholar]
Knipp, D, Tobiska W, Emery B. 2004. Direct and indirect thermospheric heating sources for solar cycles 21–23. Solar Phys 224: 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-005-6393-4. [Google Scholar]
Knipp, DJ, Welliver T, McHarg MG, Chun FK, Tobiska WK, Evans D. 2005. Climatology of extreme upper atmospheric heating events. Adv Space Res 36 (12): 2506–2510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2004.02.019. [Google Scholar]
Kodikara, T. 2019. Physical understanding and forecasting of the thermospheric structure and dynamics. Doctoral dissertation, RMIT University. https://doi.org/10.25439/rmt.27588945. [Google Scholar]
Kodikara, T, Zhang K, Pedatella NM, Borries C. 2021. The impact of solar activity on forecasting the upper atmosphere via assimilation of electron density data. Space Weather 19 (5): e2020SW002660. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002660. [Google Scholar]
Kutiev, I, Tsagouri I, Perrone L, Pancheva D, Mukhtarov P, et al. 2013. Solar activity impact on the Earth’s upper atmosphere. J Space Weather Space Clim 3: A06. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2013028. [Google Scholar]
Lawrence, A, Rawls ML, Jah M, Boley A, Di Vruno F, et al, 2022. The case for space environmentalism. Nature Astron 6 (4): 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01655-6. [Google Scholar]
Ledkov, A, Aslanov V. 2022. Review of contact and contactless active space debris removal approaches. Prog Aerosp Sci 134: 100858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100858. [Google Scholar]
Lu, Y, Shao Q, Yue H, Yang F. 2019. A review of the space environment effects on spacecraft in different orbits. IEEE Access 7: 93473–93488. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2927811. [Google Scholar]
Marianowski, C, Traub C, Pfeiffer M, Beyer J, Fasoulas S. 2025. Satellite design optimization for differential lift and drag applications. CEAS Space J 17 (1): 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-024-00550-2. [Google Scholar]
Mandea, M, Korte M, Yau A, Petrovsky E, (Eds.). 2019. Space Weather Effects in the Ionosphere in the Thermosphere and at Earth’s Surface. Cambridge University Press, pp. 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290135. [Google Scholar]
McLaughlin, CA, Mance S, Lichtenberg T. 2011. Drag coefficient estimation in orbit determination. J Astronaut Sci 58 (3): 513–530. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF03321183.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Nimis, PL, Scheidegger C, Wolseley PA. 2002. Monitoring with Lichens — Monitoring Lichens. In: NATO Science Series, PL, Nimis, Scheidegger C, Wolseley PA (Eds.). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0423-7_1. [Google Scholar]
Miyata, K, Kawashima R, Inamori T. 2018. Detailed analysis of aerodynamic effect on small satellites. Trans JSASS Aerospace Tech Japan, 16 (5): 432–440. https://doi.org/10.2322/tastj.16.432. [Google Scholar]
Moe, MM, Wallace SD, Moe K. 1995. Recommended drag coefficients for aeronomic satellites. In: The Upper Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere: A Review of Experiment and Theory, Vol. 87. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp. 349–356. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=c4e4e6b250b6a733a717e157897fbb23e84bd1f3. [Google Scholar]
Moe, K, Moe MM, Wallace SD. 1998. Improved satellite drag coefficient calculations from orbital measurements of energy accommodation. J. Spacecr. Rockets 35 (3): 266–272. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3350. [Google Scholar]
Moe, K, Moe MM. 2005. Gas-surface interactions and satellite drag coefficients. Planet. Space Sci. 53 (8): 793–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2005.03.005. [Google Scholar]
Nwankwo, VU, Chakrabarti SK. 2014. Theoretical model of drag force impact on a model international space station satellite due to solar activity. Trans JSASS, ATJ 12: 47–53. https://doi.org/10.2322/tastj.12.47. [Google Scholar]
Nwankwo, VUJ, Chakrabarti SK, Weigel RS. 2015. Effects of plasma drag on low Earth orbiting satellite due to solar forcing induced perturbations and heating. Adv Space Res 56: 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.03.044. [Google Scholar]
Nwankwo, VUJ, Chakrabarti SK. 2015. Analysis of planetary and solar-induced perturbations on trans-Martian trajectory of Mars missions before and after Mars orbit insertion. Ind J Phys 89: 1235–1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-015-0705-9. [Google Scholar]
Nwankwo, VUJ. 2016. Effects of Space Weather on Earth’s Ionosphere and Nominal LEO Satellites’ Aerodynamic Drag. Doctoral dissertation, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India. https://www.bose.res.in/linked-objects/academic-programmes/PhD%20Thesies/2016/Victor%20Uchenna%20Jonathan%20Nwankwo.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Nwankwo, VU, Chakrabarti SK. 2018. Effects of space weather on the ionosphere and LEO satellites’ orbital trajectory in equatorial, low and middle latitude. Adv Space Res 61 (7): 1880–1889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.12.034. [Google Scholar]
Nwankwo, VUJ, Jibiri NN, Kio MT. 2020a. The impact of space radiation environment on satellites operation in near-Earth space. In: Satellites Missions and Technologies for Geosciences, Demyanov, V, Becedas J (Eds.), InTech Open Publishing, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90115. [Google Scholar]
Nwankwo, VUJ, Chakrabarti SK, Sasmal S, Denig W, Ajakaiye MP, et al. 2020b. Radio aeronomy in Nigeria: First results from very low frequency (VLF) radio waves receiving station at Anchor University, Lagos. In: 2020 International Conference in Mathematics, Computer Engineering and Computer Science (ICMCECS), IEEE, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMCECS47690.2020.247002. [Google Scholar]
Nwankwo, VUJ, Denig W, Chakrabarti SK, Ajakaiye MP, Fatokun J, et al. 2021. Atmospheric drag effects on modelled low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites during the July 2000 Bastille Day event in contrast to an interval of geomagnetically quiet conditions. Ann Geophys 39: 397–412. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-397-2021. [Google Scholar]
Nwankwo, VUJ, Berdermann J, Heymann F, Kodikara TN, Fernandez-Gomez I. 2025. Model-driven assessment of space weather impact levels on the trajectory of floating debris in low earth orbit. In: Proceedings of the 9th ESA European Conference on Space Debris, Bonn, Germany. https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/proceedings/sdc9/paper/393. [Google Scholar]
Olabode, AO, Ariyibi EA. 2020. Geomagnetic storm main phase effect on the equatorial ionosphere over Ile-Ife as measured from GPS observations, Scientific African 9: e00472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00472. [Google Scholar]
Pardini, C, Anselmo L. 2009. Assessment of the consequences of the Fengyun-1C breakup in low Earth orbit. Adv Space Res 44 (5): 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.04.014. [Google Scholar]
Picone, JM, Hedin AE, Drob DP, Aikin AC. 2002. NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparisons and scientific issues. J Geophys Res Space Phys 107 (A12): SIA-15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009430. [Google Scholar]
Prölss, G. 2011. Density perturbations in the upper atmosphere caused by the dissipation of solar wind energy. Surv Geophys 32: 101–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-010-9104-0. [Google Scholar]
Pyrak, M, Anderson J. 2022. Performance of northrop Grumman’s mission extension vehicle (mev) rpo imagers at geo. In: Autonomous systems: Sensors, processing and security for ground, air, sea and space vehicles and infrastructure 2022, June. Vol. 12115. SPIE, pp. 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2631524. [Google Scholar]
Reintsema, D, Thaeter J, Rathke A, Naumann W, Rank P, et al. 2010. DEOS – the German robotics approach to secure and de-orbit malfunctioned satellites from low earth orbits. In: Proceedings of the i-SAIRAS, August. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Japan, pp. 244–251. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55274719. [Google Scholar]
Siemes, C, Borries C, Bruinsma S, Fernandez-Gomez I, HladczukN, et al. 2023. New thermosphere neutral mass density and crosswind datasets from CHAMP, GRACE, and GRACE-FO. J Space Weather Space Clim 13: 16. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2023014. [Google Scholar]
Stark, J, Swinerd G, Fortescue P. 2011. “Celestial Mechanics”, in Spacecraft Systems Engineering. Wiley, United Kingdom, pp. 79–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119971009.ch4. [Google Scholar]
Secure World Foundation. 2018. Space sustainability: A practical guide. Updated 2018. Secure World Foundation, Broomfield, CO. https://www.un-spider.org/news-and-events/news/space-sustainability-practical-guide-published-swf. [Google Scholar]
Von Puttkamer, J. 1969. Survey and comparative analysis of current geophysical models. Technical note, NASA TJ D-5163. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19690017591/downloads/19690017591.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Walterscheid, RL. 1989. Solar cycle effects on the upper atmosphere-Implications for satellite drag. J Spacecr Rockets 26 (6): 439–444. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/3.26089. [Google Scholar]
Wang, X, Ren T, Wang R, Luo B, Aa E, et al. 2024. Estimates of spherical satellite drag coefficients in the upper thermosphere during different geomagnetic conditions. Space Weather 22 (11): e2024SW003974. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW003974. [Google Scholar]
Washburn, AR. 2004. Earth coverage by satellites in circular orbit. Department of operations Research Naval Postgraduate School. https://hdl.handle.net/10945/38386. [Google Scholar]
Weeden, B. 2010. 2009 Iridium-Cosmos collision fact sheet. Secure World Foundation (SWF). www.swfound.org/. [Google Scholar]
Wertz, JR, Larson WJ. 1999. Space Mission Analysis and Design, Ser. Space Technology Library. Microcosm/Kluwer, El Segundo, CA. https://www.aerostudents.com/courses/aerospace-design-and-systems-engineering-elements-1/SpaceMissionAnalysisAndDesignBook.pdf. [Google Scholar]
White, C, Colombo C, Scanlon TJ, McInnes CR, Reese JM. 2013. Rarefied gas effects on the aerodynamics of high area-to-mass ratio spacecraft in orbit. Adv Space Res 51 (11): 2112–2124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.01.002. [Google Scholar]
Wu, Y, Mao D, Mao T, Chen Z, Wang J-S. 2025. A space weather approach for quasi-real-time assessment of satellite orbital decay during geomagnetic storms based on two-line element sets. Space Weather 23: e2024SW004289. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW004289. [Google Scholar]
Wu, Y, Mao T, Wang J-S, Tang W, Song Q, et al. 2024. An indexdescription of the general characteristics ofthermospheric density based on the Two-Line-Element data sets and the spectralwhitening method. J Geophys Res Space Phys 129: e2024JA032733. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA032733. [Google Scholar]
Yuan, L, Hoque MM, Kodikara T. 2023. The four-dimensional variational Neustrelitz Electron Density Assimilation Model: NEDAM. Space Weather 21 (6): e2022SW003378. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003378. [Google Scholar]
Zesta, E, Huang CY. 2016. Satellite orbital drag. In: Space weather fundamentals. CRC Press, pp. 329–351. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781315368474-20/satellite-orbital-drag-eftyhia-zesta-cheryl-huang. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.