Issue
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 10, 2020
Topical Issue - Scientific Advances from the European Commission H2020 projects on Space Weather
Article Number 19
Number of page(s) 20
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020018
Published online 29 May 2020
  • Akmaev RA. 2011. Whole atmosphere modeling: Connecting terrestrial and space weather. Rev Geophys 49(4): https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000364. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Becker Erich, Vadas Sharon L. 2018. Secondary gravity waves in the winter mesosphere: Results from a high-resolution global circulation model. J Geophys Res Atmos 123(5): 2605–2627. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bruinsma Sean. 2015. The DTM-2013 thermosphere model. J Space Weather Space Clim 5: A1. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Chamberlain JW and Hunten DM. 1987. Theory of planetary atmospheres. An introduction to their physics and chemistry. Int Geophys Ser 36: 481. [Google Scholar]
  • COESA. 1976. U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1976, Vol. 40, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 56 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Cullen MJP. 1993. The unified forecast/climate model. Meteorol Mag 122(1449): 81–94. [Google Scholar]
  • Davies T, Cullen MJP, Malcolm AJ, Mawson MH, Staniforth A, White AA, Wood N. 2005. A new dynamical core for the Met Office’s global and regional modelling of the atmosphere. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc: A Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Applied Meteorology And Physical Oceanography 131(608): 1759–1782. [Google Scholar]
  • Edwards JM, Slingo A. 1996. Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 122(531): 689–719. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fleming EL, Chandra S, Barnett JJ, Corney M. 1990. Zonal mean temperature, pressure, zonal wind and geopotential height as functions of latitude. Adv Space Res 10(12): 11–59. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fomichev VI, Ogibalov VP, Beagley SR. 2004. Solar heating by the near-IR CO2 bands in the mesosphere. Geophys Res Lett 31(21). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Griffin DJ, Thuburn J. 2018. Numerical effects on vertical wave propagation in deep-atmosphere models. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 144(711): 567–580. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harry Gabriel. 2015. Stabilising and Validating the Met Office’s Unified Model with 100 and 120 km Ceilings. Master’s thesis. University of Bath. [Google Scholar]
  • Hedin AE, Biondi MA, Burnside RG, Hernandez G, Johnson RM, et al. 1991. Revised global model of thermosphere winds using satellite and ground-based observations. J Geophys Res Space Phys 96(A5): 7657–7688. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Immel TJ, Sagawa E, England SL, Henderson SB, Hagan ME, Mende SB, Frey HU, Swenson CM, Paxton LJ. 2006. Control of equatorial ionospheric morphology by atmospheric tides. Geophys Res Lett 33, (15). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ineson S, Scaife AA, Knight JR, Manners JC, Dunstone NJ, Gray LJ, Haigh JD. 2011. Solar forcing of winter climate variability in the Northern Hemisphere. Nature Geosci 4(11): 753. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson DR, Fuller-Rowell TJ, Griffin DJ, Griffith MJ, Kelly CW, Marsh DR, Walach M-T. 2019. Future directions for whole atmosphere modelling: Developments in the context of space weather. Space Weather 17: 1342–1350. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002267 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson DR, Bruinsma S, Negrin S, Stolle C, Budd CJ, et al. 2020. The Space Weather Atmosphere Models and Indices (SWAMI) Project: Overview and first results. J Space Weather Space Clim, this issue. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020019. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu H-L, Foster BT, Hagan ME, McInerney JM, Maute A, et al. 2010. Thermosphere extension of the whole atmosphere community climate model. J Geophys Res Space Phys 115: A12. [Google Scholar]
  • Marsh DR, Garcia RR, Kinnison DE, Boville BA, Sassi F, Solomon SC, Matthes K. 2007. Modeling the whole atmosphere response to solar cycle changes in radiative and geomagnetic forcing. J Geophys Res Atmos 112: D23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Morgenstern O, Braesicke P, O’Connor FM, Bushell AC, Johnson CE, Osprey SM, Pyle JA. 2009. Evaluation of the new UKCA climate-composition model – Part 1: The stratosphere. Geosci Model Dev 2(1): 43–57. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2-43-2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O’Connor FM, Johnson CE, Morgenstern O, Abraham NL, Braesicke P, et al. 2014. Evaluation of the new UKCA climate-composition model – Part 2: The Troposphere. Geosci Model Dev 7(1): 41–91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Päivärinta S-M, Seppälä A, Andersson ME, Verronen PT, Thölix L, Kyrölä E. 2013. Observed effects of solar proton events and sudden stratospheric warmings on odd nitrogen and ozone in the polar middle atmosphere. J Geophys Res Atmos 118(12): 6837–6848. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rivest C, Staniforth A, Robert A. 1994. Spurious resonant response of semi-Lagrangian discretizations to orographic forcing: Diagnosis and solution. Mon Weather Rev 122(2): 366–376. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schwartz MJ, Lambert A, Manney GL, Read WG, Livesey NJ, et al. 2008. Validation of the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder temperature and geopotential height measurements. J Geophys Res Atmos 113(D15). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Seppälä A, Randall CE, Clilverd MA, Rozanov E, Rodger CJ. 2009. Geomagnetic activity and polar surface air temperature variability. J Geophys Res Atmos 114: A10. [Google Scholar]
  • Shepherd MG, Liu G, Shepherd GG. 2006. Mesospheric semiannual oscillation in temperature and nightglow emission. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 68(3–5): 379–389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Song I-S, Chun H-Y, Jee G, Kim S-Y, Kim J, Kim Y-H, Taylor MA. 2018. Dynamic initialization for whole atmospheric global modeling. J Adv Model Earth Syst 10(9): 2096–2120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Swinbank R, Ortland DA. 2003. Compilation of wind data for the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS) reference atmosphere project. J Geophys Res Atmos 108: D19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tóth G, Sokolov IV, Gombosi TI, Chesney DR, Clauer CR, et al. 2005. Space Weather Modeling Framework: A new tool for the space science community. J Geophys Res Space Phys 110: A12. [Google Scholar]
  • Telford PJ, Braesicke P, Morgenstern O, Pyle JA. 2008. Technical Note: Description and assessment of a nudged version of the new dynamics Unified Model. Atmos Chem Phys 8(6): 1701–1712. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thuburn J, Staniforth A. 2004. Conservation and linear Rossby-mode dispersion on the spherical C grid. Mon Weather Rev 132(2): 641–653. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Walters D, Baran A, Boutle I, Brooks M, Earnshaw P, et al. 2017. The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations. Geosci Model Dev Discuss 2017: 1–78. [Google Scholar]
  • Warner CD, McIntyre ME. 2001. An ultrasimple spectral parameterization for nonorographic gravity waves. J Atmos Sci 58(14): 1837–1857. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Waters JW, Froidevaux L, Harwood RS, Jarnot Robert F, et al. 2006. The earth observing system microwave limb sounder (EOS MLS) on the Aura satellite. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 44(5): 1075–1092. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wood N, Staniforth A, White A, Allen T, Diamantakis M, et al. 2014. Mohamed and others. An inherently mass-conserving semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian discretization of the deep-atmosphere global non-hydrostatic equations. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 140(682): 1505–1520. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yue X, Schreiner WS, Pedatella NM, Kuo Y-H. 2016. Characterizing GPS radio occultation loss of lock due to ionospheric weather. Space Weather 14(4): 285–299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.