Open Access
Issue |
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 11, 2021
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 52 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2021036 | |
Published online | 19 October 2021 |
- Bhowmik P, Nandy D. 2018. Prediction of the strength and timing of sunspot cycle 25 reveal decadal-scale space environmental conditions. Nat Commun 9: Article ID 5209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07690-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bushby P, Tobias S. 2007. On Predicting the solar cycle using mean-field models. Astrophys J 661: 1289–1296. https://doi.org/10.1086/516628. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cameron RH, Dikpati M, Brandenburg A. 2017. The Global Solar Dynamo. Space Sci Rev 210: 367–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0230-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Charbonneau P. 2010. Dynamo models of the solar cycle. Living Rev Sol Phys 7: Article ID 3. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2010-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Clette F, Svalgaard L, Vaquero JM, Cliver EW. 2014. Revisiting the sunspot number. A 400-year perspective on the solar cycle. Space Sci Rev 186(1–4): 35–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0074-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Diego P, Storini M, Laurenza M. 2010. Persistence in recurrent geomagnetic activity and its connection with Space Climate. J Geophys Res 115: A06103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014716. [Google Scholar]
- Dikpati M, Gilman PA, De Toma G. 2008. The Waldmeier effect: an artifact of the definition of Wolf sunspots number? Astrophys J 673: 99–101. https://doi.org/10.1086/527360. [Google Scholar]
- Feynman J. 1982. Geomagnetic and solar wind cycles, 1900–1975. J Geophys Res 87(A8): 6153–6162. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA087iA08p06153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fligge M, Solanki SK, Beer J. 1999. Determination of solar cycle length variations using the continuous wavelet transform. A&A 346: 313–321. [Google Scholar]
- Hathaway DH. 2010. The solar cycle. Living Rev Sol Phys 7(1): 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/lrsp-2015-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hathaway DH, Wilson RM. 2006. Geomagnetic activity indicates large amplitude for sunspot cycle 24. Geophys Res Lett 33: L18101. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027053. [Google Scholar]
- Hyndman RJ, Koehler AB. 2006. Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. Int J Forecast 22(4): 679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Karak BB, Choudhuri AR. 2010. The Waldmeier effect in sunspot cycles. Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. arXiv:1008.2931v1 [astro-ph.SR]. [Google Scholar]
- Karak BB, Choudhuri AR. 2011. The Waldmeier effect and the flux transport solar dynamo, Department of Physics. Mon Not R Astron Soc 410: 1503–1512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17531.x. [Google Scholar]
- Komitov B, Bonev B. 2001. Amplitude variations of the 11 year cycle and the current solar maximum 23. Astrophys J 554: L119–L122. https://doi.org/10.1086/320908. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Laurenza M, Vecchio A, Storini M, Carbone V. 2012. Quasi-biennial modulation of galactic cosmic rays. Astrophys J 749: 167 (11 pp). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Levitin AE, Obridko VN, Val’chuk TE, Golyshev SA, Dremukhina LA. 1995. Recurrence index of planetary geomagnetic activity and its connection with the solar rotation. Geomag Aeron 35: 260–263. [Google Scholar]
- Mayaud PN. 1972. The aa indices: A 100-year series characterizing the magnetic activity. J Geophys Res 77(34): 6870–6874. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA077i034p06870. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- McIntosh SW, Chapman S, Leamon RJ, Egeland R, Watkins NW, et al. 2020. Overlapping magnetic activity cycles and the sunspot number: Forecasting sunspot cycle 25 amplitude. Sol Phys 295: 163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01723-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ohl AI. 1966. Wolf’s number prediction for the maximum of the cycle20. Soln Dann 12: 84. [Google Scholar]
- Pesnell WD. 2008. Predictions of solar cycle 24. Sol Phys 252: 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9252-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pesnell WD. 2016. Predictions of solar cycle 24: How are we doing? Space Weather 14: 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015SW001304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pesnell WD. 2018. Effects of version 2 of the International Sunspot Number on naïve predictions of solar cycle 25. Space Weather 16: 1997–2003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW002080. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pesnell WD, Schatten K. 2018. An early prediction of the amplitude of solar cycle 25. Sol Phys 293: 112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1330-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Petrovay K. 2010. Solar cycle prediction. Living Rev Sol Phys 7: 59. Article ID 6. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2010-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Petrovay K. 2020. Solar cycle prediction. Living Rev Sol Phys 17: Article ID 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-020-0022-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sargent HH. 1985. Recurrent geomagnetic activity: Evidence for long-lived stability in solar wind structure. J Geophys Res 90: 1425–1428. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA090iA02p01425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Schatten K. 2005. Fair space weather for solar cycle 24. Geophys Res Lett 32: L21106. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Schatten KH, Scherrer PH, Svalgaard L, Wilcox JM. 1978. Using Dynamo Theory to predict the sunspot number during solar cycle 21. Geophys Res Lett 5: 411–414. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL005i005p00411. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- SILSO. 2019. World data center – sunspot number and long-term solar observations. Royal Observatory of Belgium, on-line sunspot number catalogue: http://www.sidc.be/SILSO/, years 1878–2020. [Google Scholar]
- Storini M, Bazilevskaya GA, Fluckiger EO, Krainev MB, Makhmutov VS, Sladkova AI. 2003. The Gnevyshev gap: A review for space weather. Adv Space Res 31: 895–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00789-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Storini M, Hofer MY, Sykora J. 2006. Towards the understanding of coronal hole occurrence during the Schwabe cycle. Adv Space Res 38: 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2006.03.024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Svalgaard L, Cliver E, Kamide Y. 2005. Sunspot Cycle 24: Smallest cycle in 100 years? Geophys Res Lett 32: 5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021664. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tobias S, Hughes D, Weiss N. 2006. Unpredictable Sun leaves researchers in the dark. Nature 442: 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/442026c. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Upton LA, Hathaway DH. 2018. An updated solar cycle 25 prediction with AFT: The modern minimum. Geophys Res Lett 45: 8091–8095. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078387. [Google Scholar]
- Usoskin I, Mursula K. 2003. Long-term solar cycle evolution: review of recent developments. Sol Phys 218: 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOLA.0000013049.27106.07. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Usoskin I, Kovaltsov G, Kiviaho W. 2021. Robustness of solar-cycle empirical rules across different series including an updated ADF sunspot group series. Sol Phys 296: Article ID 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01750-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Vecchio A, Laurenza M, Carbone V, Storini M. 2010. The quasi-biennial modulation of solar neutrino flux, solar and galactic cosmic rays by the solar cyclic activity. Astrophys J Lett 709: L1–L5. Article ID 1. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/709/1/L1. [Google Scholar]
- Vecchio A, Lepreti F, Laurenza M, Alberti T, Carbone V. 2017. Connection between solar activity cycles and grand minima generation. A&A 599: 12. Article ID A58. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629758. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Vecchio A, Lepreti F, Laurenza M, Carbone V, Alberti T. 2019. Solar activity cycles and grand minima occurrence. N. Cim. C 42: Article ID 15. https://doi.org/10.1393/ncc/i2019-19015-0. [Google Scholar]
- Waldmeier M. 1935. Neue Eigenschaften der Sonnenfleckenkurve. Astron Mitt Eidgenoss Sternwarte Zurich 14: 105–136. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.