Open Access
| Issue |
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 14, 2024
Topical Issue - Swarm 10-Year Anniversary
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 30 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2024033 | |
| Published online | 15 November 2024 | |
- Alam F, Chowdhury H, Moria H, Fuss FK. 2010. A comparative study of football aerodynamics. Proc Eng 2(2): 2443–2448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bartels J, Heck N, Johnston H. 1939. The three-hour-range index measuring geomagnetic activity. Terres Magn Atmos Electr 44(4): 411–454. https://doi.org/10.1029/TE044i004p00411. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Brown WJ, Beggan CD, Cox GA, Macmillan S. 2021. The BGS candidate models for IGRF-13 with a retrospective analysis of IGRF-12 secular variation forecasts. Earth Planets Space 73: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01301-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chakraborty S, Morley SK. 2020. Probabilistic prediction of geomagnetic storms and the Kp index. J Space Weather Space Clim 10: 36. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020037. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Cox G, Brown W, Billingham L, Holme R. 2018. Magpysv: a python package for processing and denoising geomagnetic observatory data. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 19(9): 3347–3363. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007714. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dieminger W, Hartmann GK, Leitinger R. 1996. Geomagnetic activity indices, in: The upper atmosphere: data analysis and interpretation, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 887–911. Available at https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:118396726. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dimmock AP, Rosenqvist L, Hall J-O, Viljanen A, Yordanova E, Honkonen I, André M, Sjöberg E. 2019. The GIC and geomagnetic response over Fennoscandia to the 7–8 September 2017 geomagnetic storm. Space Weather 17(7): 989–1010. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW002132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Finlay CC, Kloss C, Olsen N, Hammer MD, Toffner-Clausen L, Grayver A, Kuvshinov A. 2020. The CHAOS-7 geomagnetic field model and observed changes in the South Atlantic Anomaly. Earth Planets Space 72(1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01252-9. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Friis-Christensen E, Lühr H, Knudsen D, Haagmans R. 2008. Swarm – an Earth observation mission investigating geospace. Adv Space Res 41(1): 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2006.10.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gagarinov P. 2017. SphereTri. https://github.com/pgagarinov/spheretri. [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton B. 2013. Rapid modelling of the large-scale magnetospheric field from Swarm satellite data. Earth Planets Space 65: 1295–1308. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2013.09.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hammer MD, Cox GA, Brown WJ, Beggan CD, Finlay CC. 2021. Geomagnetic virtual observatories: monitoring geomagnetic secular variation with the Swarm satellites. Earth Planets Space 73: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01357-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hulot G, Vigneron P, Léger J-M, Fratter I, Olsen N, et al. 2015. Swarm’s absolute magnetometer experimental vector mode, an innovative capability for space magnetometry. Geophys Res Lett 42(5): 1352–1359. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062700. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Matzka J, Bronkalla O, Tornow K, Elger K, Stolle C. 2021. Geomagnetic Kp index. GFZ German Res Centre Geosci 11, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5880/Kp.0001. [Google Scholar]
- Olsen N, Albini G, Bouffard J, Parrinello T, Toffner-Clausen L. 2020. Magnetic observations from CryoSat-2: calibration and processing of satellite platform magnetometer data. Earth Planets Space 72: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01171-9. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Oughton EJ, Skelton A, Horne RB, Thomson AW, Gaunt CT. 2017. Quantifying the daily economic impact of extreme space weather due to failure in electricity transmission infrastructure. Space Weather 15(1): 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016SW001491. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Owens MJ, Lockwood M, Barnard LA, Scott CJ, Haines C, Macneil A. 2021. Extreme space-weather events and the solar cycle. Sol Phys 296(5): 82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01831-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sadourny R, Arakawa A, Mintz Y. 1968. Integration of the nondivergent barotropic vorticity equation with an icosahedral-hexagonal grid for the sphere. Month Weather Rev 96(6): 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Smith A, Pačes M, Santillan D. 2024a. ESA-VirES. URL: https://vires.services. [Google Scholar]
- Smith A, Pačes M, Santillan D. 2024b. ESA-VirES/VirES-Python-Client. Dataset on Zenodo. URL: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2554162. [Google Scholar]
- Smith A, Pačes M, Swarm D. 2022. Python tools for ESA’s Swarm mission: VirES for Swarm and surrounding ecosystem. Front Astron Space Sci 9: 1002697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.1002697. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Thomson AW, Lesur V. 2007. An improved geomagnetic data selection algorithm for global geomagnetic field modelling. Geophys J Int 169(3): 951–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03354.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Toffner-Clausen L, Lesur V, Olsen N, Finlay C. 2016. In-flight scalar calibration and characterisation of the Swarm magnetometry package. Earth Planet Space 68: 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0501-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- UK Cabinet Office. 2017. National risk register of civil emergencies – 2017 edition. [Google Scholar]
- Walach M-T, Grocott A. 2019. SuperDARN observations during geomagnetic storms, geomagnetically active times, and enhanced solar wind driving. J Geophys Res Space Phys 124(7): 5828–5847. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026816. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Williamson DL. 1968. Integration of the barotropic vorticity equation on a spherical geodesic grid. Tellus 20(4): 642–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1968.tb00406.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Yamazaki Y, Matzka J, Stolle C, Kervalishvili G, Rauberg J, Bronkalla O, Morschhauser A, Bruinsma S, Shprits Y, Jackson D. 2022. Geomagnetic activity index Hpo. Geophys Res Lett 49(10): e2022GL098860. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098860. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.