Open Access
| Issue |
J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 15, 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 9 | |
| Number of page(s) | 13 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2025003 | |
| Published online | 12 March 2025 | |
- Akasofu S-I, Kamide Y. 2005. Comment on “The extreme magnetic storm of 1–2 September 1859” by BT Tsurutani, WD Gonzalez, GS Lakhina, and S Alex. J Geophys Res Space Phys 110(A9): A09226. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011005. [Google Scholar]
- Astafyeva E, Yasyukevich Y, Maksikov A, Zhivetiev I. 2014. Geomagnetic storms, super-storms, and their impacts on GPS-based navigation systems. Space Weather 12(7): 508–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014SW001072. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Beggan C, Clarke E, Lawrence E, Eaton E, Williamson J, Matsumoto K, Hayakawa H. 2023. Digitised magnetogram data from the Carrington storm 25th August to 5th September 1859 recorded at Greenwich and Kew Gardens. https://doi.org/10.5285/C03EC758–D74D-4267–97FE-1BE409F4C366. [Google Scholar]
- Beggan C, Clarke E, Lawrence E, Eaton E, Williamson J, Matsumoto K, Hayakawa H. 2024. Digitized continuous magnetic recordings for the August/September 1859 storms from London, UK. Space Weather 22(3): e2023SW003807. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003807. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Beggan CD, Billingham L, Clarke E. 2018. Estimating external magnetic field differences at high geomagnetic latitudes from a single station. Geophys Prospect 66(6): 1227–1240. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2478.12641. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Blake SP, Pulkkinen A, Schuck PW, Nevanlinna H, Reale O, Veenadhari B, Mukherjee S. 2020. Magnetic field measurements from Rome during the August–September 1859 storms. J Geophys Res Space Phys 125(6): e2019JA027336. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell WH. 1989. An introduction to quiet daily geomagnetic fields. Pure Appl Geophys 131: 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876831. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cid C, Palacios J, Saiz E, Guerrero A, Cerrato Y. 2014. On extreme geomagnetic storms. J Space Weather Space Clim 4: A28. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014026. [Google Scholar]
- Cliver EW, Dietrich WF. 2013. The 1859 space weather event revisited: limits of extreme activity. J Space Weather Space Clim 3: A31. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2013053. [Google Scholar]
- Cliver EW, Schrijver CJ, Shibata K, Usoskin IG. 2022. Extreme solar events. Living Rev Sol Phys 19(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-022-00033-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cliver EW, Svalgaard L. 2004. The 1859 solar–terrestrial disturbance and the current limits of extreme space weather activity. Sol Phys 224: 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-005-4980-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Curto JJ, Castell J, Del Moral F. 2016. Sfe: waiting for the big one. J Space Weather Space Clim 6: A23. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2016018. [Google Scholar]
- Garland GD. 1979. The contributions of Carl Friedrich Gauss to geomagnetism. Hist Math 6(1): 5–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Green JL, Boardsen S. 2006. Duration and extent of the great auroral storm of 1859. Adv Space Res 38(2): 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.08.054. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hapgood M, Angling MJ, Attrill G, Bisi M, Cannon PS, et al. 2021. Development of space weather reasonable worst-case scenarios for the UK national risk assessment. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002593. [Google Scholar]
- Hayakawa H, Bechet S, Clette F, Hudson HS, Maehara H, Namekata K, Notsu Y. 2023. Magnitude estimates for the Carrington flare in 1859 September: as seen from the original records. Astrophys J Lett 954(1): L3. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acd853. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hayakawa H, Ebihara Y, Willis DM, Toriumi S, Iju T, et al. 2019. Temporal and spatial evolutions of a large sunspot group and great auroral storms around the Carrington event in 1859. Space Weather 17(11): 1553–1569. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hayakawa H, Nevanlinna H, Blake SP, Ebihara Y, Bhaskar AT, Miyoshi Y. 2022. Temporal variations of the three geomagnetic field components at Colaba observatory around the Carrington storm in 1859. Astrophys J 928(1): 32. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac2601. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hejda P, Valach F, Revallo M. 2021. The geomagnetic data of the Clementinum observatory in Prague since 1839. Ann Geophys 39: 439–454. Copernicus GmbH. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-439-2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hejda P, Valach F, Revallo M. 2023. Historical geomagnetic observations from Prague observatory (since 1839) and their contribution to geomagnetic research. History Geo Space Sci 14(1): 51–60. https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-14-51-2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kappenman JG. 2005. An overview of the impulsive geomagnetic field disturbances and power grid impacts associated with the violent Sun-Earth connection events of 29–31 October 2003 and a comparative evaluation with other contemporary storms. Space Weather 3(8): S08C01. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004SW000128. [Google Scholar]
- Koninklijk Nederlandsch Meteorologisch Instituut. 1854. Nederlandsch Meteorologisch Jaarboek 1853. Utrecht: Kemink en Zoon. [Google Scholar]
- Koninklijk Nederlandsch Meteorologisch Instituut. 1856. Nederlandsch Meteorologisch Jaarboek 1855. Utrecht: Kemink en Zoon. [Google Scholar]
- Koninklijk Nederlandsch Meteorologisch Instituut. 1857. Nederlandsch Meteorologisch Jaarboek 1856. Utrecht: Kemink en Zoon. [Google Scholar]
- Koninklijk Nederlandsch Meteorologisch Instituut. 1858. Nederlandsch Meteorologisch Jaarboek 1857. Utrecht: Kemink en Zoon. [Google Scholar]
- Koninklijk Nederlandsch Meteorologisch Instituut. 1860. Nederlandsch Meteorologisch Jaarboek 1859. Utrecht: Kemink en Zoon. [Google Scholar]
- Koninklijk Nederlandsch Meteorologisch Instituut. 1888. Nederlandsch Meteorologisch Jaarboek 1887. Utrecht: Kemink en Zoon. [Google Scholar]
- Koninklijk Nederlandsch Meteorologisch Instituut. 1895. Meteorologisch Jaarboek voor 1893. Utrecht: J. van Boekhoven. [Google Scholar]
- Koninklijk Nederlandsch Meteorologisch Instituut. 1896. Meteorologisch Jaarboek voor 1894. Utrecht: J. van Boekhoven. [Google Scholar]
- Krecke F. 1849. Description de l’observatoire météorologique et magnétique à Utrecht. Utrecht: Société Provinciale des Arts et des Sciences à Utrecht. Available at Utrecht Archives. [Google Scholar]
- Love JJ. 2021. Extreme-event magnetic storm probabilities derived from rank statistics of historical Dst intensities for solar cycles 14–24. Space Weather 19(4): e2020SW002579. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002579. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Malin S. 1982. Sequicentenary of Gauss’s first measurement of the absolute value of magnetic intensity. Philos Trans R Soc London Series A Math Phys Sci 306(1492): 5–8. [Google Scholar]
- Nevanlinna H. 1997. Gauss’ H-variometer at the Helsinki magnetic observatory 1844–1912. J Geomagn Geoelectr 49(10): 1209–1215. https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.49.1209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nevanlinna H. 2008. On geomagnetic variations during the August–September storms of 1859. Adv Space Res 42(1): 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2008.01.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Reay SJ, Clarke E, Dawson E, Macmillan S. 2013. Operations of the world data centre for geomagnetism, Edinburgh. Data Sci J 12: WDS47–WDS51. http://datascience.codata.org/articles/abstract/10.2481/dsj.WDS-005/. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Siscoe G, Crooker N, Clauer C. 2006. Dst of the Carrington storm of 1859. Adv Space Res 38(2): 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tsurutani BT, Gonzalez WD, Lakhina G, Alex S. 2003. The extreme magnetic storm of 1–2 September 1859. J Geophys Res Space Phys 108(A7): 1268. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009504. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- von Lamont J. 1849. Handbuch des Erdmagnetismus. Berlin: Verlag von Veit & Comp. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.