Table 5.

A comparison of the HSEs to other literatures.

Literature Test period Model Hit Miss False HRb FARc
Our system From 2007 to 2016 HAF 327 216 137 0.60 0.30
In MacNeice (2009)a From mid-2006 to mid-2008 WSA 23 30 11 0.43 0.32
In Norquist & Meeks (2010) 1997, 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005, and 2007 HAF 82 164 205 0.33 0.71
WSA 127 120 246 0.51 0.66
In Owen et al. (2010) 1995–2002 Baseline 138 95 26 0.59 0.16
WSA-ENLIL 90 142 17 0.39 0.16
CROHEL 121 114 27 0.51 0.18
a

For r cs = 5r 0 for GONG magnetogram sources in MacNeice (2009).

b

HR is calculated by Hit/(Hit + Miss).

c

FAR is calculated by False/(False + Hit).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.