Open Access
Table 5.
A comparison of the HSEs to other literatures.
Literature | Test period | Model | Hit | Miss | False | HRb | FARc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Our system | From 2007 to 2016 | HAF | 327 | 216 | 137 | 0.60 | 0.30 |
In MacNeice (2009)a | From mid-2006 to mid-2008 | WSA | 23 | 30 | 11 | 0.43 | 0.32 |
In Norquist & Meeks (2010) | 1997, 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005, and 2007 | HAF | 82 | 164 | 205 | 0.33 | 0.71 |
WSA | 127 | 120 | 246 | 0.51 | 0.66 | ||
In Owen et al. (2010) | 1995–2002 | Baseline | 138 | 95 | 26 | 0.59 | 0.16 |
WSA-ENLIL | 90 | 142 | 17 | 0.39 | 0.16 | ||
CROHEL | 121 | 114 | 27 | 0.51 | 0.18 |
a
For r cs = 5r 0 for GONG magnetogram sources in MacNeice (2009).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.