J. Space Weather Space Clim.
Volume 5, 2015
Satellite mission concepts developed at the Alpbach 2013 Summer School on space weather
Article Number A5
Number of page(s) 16
Published online 17 February 2015

© J. Amaya et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2015

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Introduction

The Photospheric And Chromospheric and Coronal Magnetic field ANalyzer (PAC2MAN) mission is the result of an intensive 2-week academic exercise performed in the framework of the “ESA Alpbach Summer School 2013 – Space Weather: Science, Missions and Systems”. The main goal of our project is to understand the origin of energetic solar activity and their impact on the Earth environment. A precise forecast of the initiation of solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CME) and their impact on the Earth environment is still impossible due to the shortcomings of our current scientific knowledge and the inadequacy of the space missions in service today. We propose a new space mission that seeks to fill the gaps in our scientific understanding of space weather. The mission measures the three-dimensional structure of the magnetic field in the solar atmosphere, the propagation speed of interplanetary CME (ICME) between the Sun and the Earth, and the plasma properties at 1AU and in the near-Earth environment. The Photospheric And Chromospheric and Coronal Magnetic field ANalyzer (PAC2MAN) is a space mission dedicated to the study of eruptive solar events by analyzing the evolution of the magnetic field in these three layers of the solar atmosphere. The mission follows space weather events from their formation in the Sun to their impact on the Earth environment. All the technical and scientific solutions presented in this paper were designed and evaluated during the 2-week duration of the school.

It is impossible to forecast with precision the effects of space weather events on the Earth environment using the currently available scientific and engineering tools. The reason why some of these events have a stronger effect than others is not completely identified. The impact level of the events is measured by their geoeffectiveness, i.e. their ability to cause geomagnetic storms. These can be measured by different geomagnetic indices like the Dst or Ap indices.

Statistical analysis of observations has shown that 70% of Earth-oriented ICMEs cause geomagnetic storms. This percentage gradually reduces to 60% for limb ICMEs and 0% for back oriented CMEs (see Gopalswamy et al. 2007). Studies of the correlation between in-situ measurements and solar disk observations have shown that the majority of the Earth-oriented ICMEs originate within the 50° central meridian of the Sun (see Cane & Richardson 2003). However, their geoeffectiveness cannot be forecasted: roughly the same number of events produces quiet (Dst = −1 nT), weak (Dst = −30 nT), strong (Dst = −50 nT), and intense (Dst = −100 nT) geomagnetic storms (see Mustajab & Badruddin 2013).

Stronger magnetic storms have been associated with large north-south components of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and high solar wind speeds (see Mustajab & Badruddin 2013). However, by the time such parameters can be measured by satellites stationed at the L1 Lagrangian point, the forecast time of how geoeffective they will be is limited to less than 1 h. The situation is worse if we consider the effects of solar flare radiation traveling from the Sun to the Earth in minutes at speeds close to the speed of light (see Curto & Gaya-Piqué 2009).

To forecast space weather conditions that are hazardous to humans and technology, we need a tool to study the processes of CME initiation and acceleration in the Sun and the high energy particle acceleration and propagation towards the Earth (see Feynman & Gabriel 2000). It has been observed that magnetic energy buildup plays a major role in the initiation of the events (see Feynman & Martin 1995; Reinard et al. 2010). To understand this initiation process, we must track the evolution of magnetic structures in active regions of the solar photosphere, chromosphere, and corona (see Owens & Crooker 2006). Observations in the days previous to the events will be used to forecast the exact day of eruption. Accurate measurements of the magnetic topology and energetic conditions in the Sun will be correlated to the in-situ measurements of plasma conditions near the Earth. Improved forecasting models of ICME and flare geoeffectiveness can be derived from these observations.

A detailed description of the scientific background of the mission is presented in Section 3. The mission profile and the engineering solutions are presented in Section 4. Finally, a detailed description of the optical and in-situ instruments is given in Section 5.

2. Mission objectives

The proposed mission has the following operational and scientific objectives:

Primary objective: Understand and predict the initiation and development of potentially hazardous CMEs and flares.

Secondary objective: Determine the speed and direction of CMEs in order to forecast near realtime solar wind conditions close to Earth.

A successful mission will be characterized by the following accomplishments:

  • The new measurements of the magnetic field will lead to improved models of CME initiation and propagation (see Luhmann et al. 1998).

  • The mission will detect how likely a flare or a CME will emerge in a given region of the Sun, with high statistical significance, 2–3 days before their occurrence, improving the forecast accuracy reported by Reinard et al. (2010).

  • Improved models will correlate solar magnetic conditions with their effects on the near-Earth environment, leading to better forecasts of CME and flare geoeffectiveness.

3. Scientific background

The amount of energy released during the most intense solar events can reach 1032 erg, which makes them the most powerful events in the solar system (see Woods et al. 2006; Kretzschmar 2011; Schrijver et al. 2012; Aulanier et al. 2013; Cliver & Dietrich 2013). This magnetic energy is stored in non-potential magnetic fields associated with electric currents in the solar atmosphere. The magnetic energy available in an eruptive event is called “free energy” and is by definition the difference between the potential and the non-potential energy. Magnetic flux emergence can increase the amount of free energy available in an active region, raising the complexity of the magnetic field and its non-potentiality.

Under such circumstances, an instability can lead to magnetic reconnection and to a topology closer to the potential configuration. During the reconnection process magnetic energy is released that can trigger flares and/or CMEs. The magnetic energy is transferred in the form of particle acceleration, plasma motion (ejection of material), and plasma heating (see Emslie et al. 2004). To calculate the energy budget of an eruptive event it is necessary to measure the amount of free energy available in the active region before the event and the amount of energy effectively released during the event.

The evolution of the coronal magnetic field and electric currents in active regions is a key observable to predict eruptive events such as flares and CMEs days before their occurrence. The magnetic topology of the Sun is usually measured in the photosphere using the Zeeman effect: the spectral lines observed are split in three components of different polarization states due to the presence of the magnetic field. However, in the corona the Zeeman splitting is usually small compared to the thermal broadening.

One of the most promising methods to measure the coronal magnetic field is the interpretation of the Hanle effect in spectral lines. In the corona, the light of spectral lines formed in the lower layers is scattered, introducing a linear polarization in the 90° direction which can be observed in off-limb coronal structures. The direction and degree of the polarization are modified in the presence of a local magnetic field. These modifications depend both on the direction and the strength of the local magnetic field. In addition, the Hanle effect can be measured by integration over the whole line profile. This property can be used to observe faint spectral lines. However, the analysis of the Hanle effect in a single line cannot give complete information about the local magnetic field because only two parameters of the polarization are measured. Therefore, Hanle measurements have to be combined with other observations in order to calculate the three components of the magnetic field (see Bommier & Sahal-Brechot 1982). The Hanle sensitivity to the magnetic field strength is not the same for all lines: some lines are useful to determine strong magnetic fields, whereas other lines are adapted to probe weaker fields (see Sahal-Brechot 1981; Judge et al. 2001).

3.1. Previous work

Today only the photospheric magnetic field is continuously measured whereas the coronal field is deduced from numerical models using the former as boundary conditions. Potential and force-free models are used for the extrapolations (see Cheung & DeRosa 2012), but this method gives uncertain results due to electric currents and non-force-free conditions in the chromosphere and transition region, as well as small scale currents missing in the numerical extrapolations. The extrapolations are also sensitive to the errors in the boundary conditions (e.g. the observational errors in the measurements of the photospheric magnetic field). Reviews of the non-linear force-free extrapolation methods and discussion of their limitations can be found in Demoulin et al. (1997), Amari et al. (1997), McClymont et al. (1997).

A recent study by Sun et al. (2012) failed to quantify the magnetic free energy loss during a major flare using this technique. This example shows the limitations of coronal magnetic field extrapolations. The authors of the publication were able to study the evolution of the free energy in an active region before and after the flare. Before the X2.2 flare a progressive increase of the free energy is observed and a sudden decrease follows after the occurrence of the flare. The decrease of free energy is equal to (3.4 ± 0.4) × 1031 erg, which is of the same order of magnitude of the energy observed in accelerated electrons (5 × 1031 erg). This is intriguing since other components of the event must also be powered including the CME kinetic energy, which is usually greater than the non-thermal energy of accelerated electrons (see Emslie et al. 2004).

3.1.1. Measurements of the photospheric magnetic field

The two main instruments recording magnetograms in the photosphere are the Helioseismic Magnetic Imager (HMI) on board the Solar Dynamic Observatory (SDO) and the Spectropolarimeter in the Solar Optical Telescope (SOT) on Hinode (see Scherrer et al. 2012). They provide spectropolarimetric measurements in iron lines and their characteristics are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

The two main instruments currently providing magnetograms in the photosphere.

These spectropolarimetric measurements lead to a calculation of the vector magnetic field in each spectral line (i.e. at a given altitude), via the interpretation of the Zeeman effect for each line. The magnetic field strength and direction can be calculated from the measurement of the full Stokes parameters in one line profile.

The main difference between the two instruments is that Hinode/SOT scans an active region and thus provides two magnetograms (because two lines are observed) in 45 min (duration of scan) for one active region. Because these two lines are close together in wavelength, the magnetograms represent the magnetic field at two close altitudes in the solar photosphere. Therefore Hinode provides the spatial variation of the magnetic field not only in the plane parallel to the solar surface, but also in the direction perpendicular to it. This provides the possibility of calculating the three components of the electric current density from the curl of B.

SDO/HMI measures the vector magnetic field in only one plane. Gradients of the field cannot be obtained in the perpendicular direction to the plane, and therefore only the vertical component of the curl of B can be deduced. However, the time resolution used by the HMI instrument is high enough to follow the evolution of the magnetic structures in active regions. It also makes full-disk magnetograms so all active regions can be observed at the same time.

3.1.2. Measurements of the chromospheric magnetic field

Chromospheric magnetic fields have been successfully measured using the spectropolarimetric observations in the sodium D1/D2 doublet (at 589.59 nm and 589.00 nm) with the THEMIS Solar Telescope, a ground-based instrument producing spectropolarimetric observations of active regions. The Zeeman effect has been interpreted to produce magnetic field vector maps in the two lines and electric current density vector maps for several active regions. The use of a doublet is advantageous because it provides the three components of the current density, and not simply the vertical one.

3.1.3. Measurements of the coronal magnetic field

Measurements of the coronal magnetic field have been performed along sight lines to radio sources that allow Faraday rotation measurements (see Patzold et al. 1987; Mancuso & Spangler 1999). This technique provides information only along the line of sight between the instrument and the radio source, and only by interpolation and careful modeling is able to be used to produce 2D maps of the coronal magnetic field. Other types of measurements have been performed using the Faraday rotation of polarized solar radiation (see Alissandrakis & Chiuderi Drago 1995).

The measurement of magnetic field strength in active regions in the low corona can be inferred with the observation of radio gyrosynchrotron emission (e.g. Gary & Hurford 1994). This technique has so far been used only for active regions with strong magnetic field: the measurements are difficult to analyze because the height of the radio sources is difficult to interpret.

The most promising technique that remains is the measurement of the full Stokes parameters (I, V, U, Q) in coronal spectral lines from the interpretation of different effects (longitudinal Zeeman effect, resonance polarization, Hanle effect). These measurements can only be obtained in the corona above the solar limb with a coronagraph (see Judge et al. 2001).

One of the most promising spectral lines for Hanle effect measurements is the hydrogen Lyman α line. Bommier & Sahal-Brechot (1982) explored the theoretical potential of measurements of the coronal magnetic field using the interpretation of the Hanle effect from Lyman α. They concluded that this spectral line was a very promising way to provide Hanle effect analyses but that interpretations needed to be complemented by additional measurements in order to determine the three components of the magnetic field. One interesting option is to additionally measure the linear polarization in forbidden emission lines in the infrared range.

Raouafi et al. (2009) confirmed that Hanle effect measurements in UV spectral lines are a promising way of measuring the coronal magnetic field. They argue that the hydrogen Lyman α and β lines (121.516 nm and 102.572 nm) could be used to differentiate field strengths and make them complementary to each other.

One of the most promising infrared lines to measure the coronal magnetic field has already been used (see Lin et al. 2004). Spectropolarimetric measurements of the off-limb corona, in the emission line FeXIII (1075 nm), have been accomplished with an optical fiber-bundle imaging spectropolarimeter installed in a ground-based solar coronagraph (SOLARC). This forbidden coronal line has a high potential to determine the physical conditions of the plasma with a temperature of about 2 MK. This line is very sensitive to electron density (see Chevalier & Lambert 1969; Flower & Pineau des Forets 1973). Lin et al. (2004) measured the full Stokes linear and circular polarized intensity in this line and produced the first two-dimensional coronal magnetic field map (coronal magnetogram).

Recently, the off-limb magnetic field has been measured with a ground-based instrument, the Coronal Multi-channel Polarimeter (COMP), integrated into the Coronal One Shot coronagraph at Sacramento Peak Observatory (see Tomczyk et al. 2008). The spectropolarimetric measurements in the forbidden FeXIII emission lines at 1074.7 nm and 1079.8 nm and the chromospheric line HeI at 1083.0 nm have been used, with the interpretation of the Zeeman and Hanle effects combined in the corona to calculate the vector magnetic field, and to produce 2D maps of the magnetic field.

3.2. Scientific requirements for the PAC2MAN mission

In order to improve our analysis of the free energy buildup and release in the corona, as well as the development of instabilities in the active regions, we need to:

  • improve the extrapolation: include non-linear effects introduced by current systems in the corona using alternative models others than force-free field. This advanced modeling is still difficult to achieve (see Judge et al. 2001)

  • measure continuously the magnetic field in other layers of the Sun (chromosphere, transition region, corona) to add more constraints on the magnetic field, current systems, and magnetic energy. Perform simultaneously direct measurements of magnetic field vector and electric current density (via the curl of magnetic field) in several layers of the solar atmosphere.

Our mission fulfills the second requirement, by providing simultaneous measurements of the magnetic field in the photosphere, chromosphere, and low-corona, with a high time cadence and spatial resolution. It provides data to follow the evolution of magnetic field and magnetic free energy in the corona, and then to understand the magnetic thresholds leading to eruptive events. A continuous data recording and a constant communications link with ground stations provide the means to predict the intensity of eruptive events such as flares and CMEs days before their occurrence.

The measurements in the photosphere and in the chromosphere are performed with spectropolarimetric observations in two doublets, to provide the three components of the magnetic field and of the electric current density in these layers. These measurements use the interpretation of the Zeeman effect near the disk center where the projection effects are negligible. The measurements of the coronal field are obtained from the off-limb corona using a coronagraph interpreting the Hanle effect. A detailed three-dimensional reconstruction of the photospheric and the chromospheric magnetic fields is possible using a stereoscopic view. To attain this goal, measurements of the center of the solar disk obtained from an L1 orbit can be complemented with observations of the off-limb coronal magnetic field performed from a second spacecraft at nearly 90°.

The magnetic field reconstructions are compared against images obtained with a UV imager placed in each spacecraft. This instrument provides images of the chromospheric and coronal plasma loops that follow the 3D coronal magnetic field. White-light observations (scattered light) are also used to estimate physical properties and the global topology of the corona.

To obtain a complete picture of the full space weather system, additional measurements must be performed in the space between the Sun and the Earth. Using the stereoscopic placement of the satellites to advantage, it is possible to track Earth-directed CMEs. Observations of the scattered light of the ejections with an additional coronagraph and a Heliospheric Imager allow determination of the exact direction of propagation and velocity of ICMEs. In-situ measurements of the solar wind conditions at 1 AU provide an additional characterization of the effects of solar events in the interplanetary environment.

4. Mission profile

The PAC2MAN mission is composed of two satellites and a network of ground tracking stations that monitors the Sun and interplanetary space between Sun and Earth from two nearly orthogonal positions: the Spacecraft Earth (SCE) satellite orbits around L1 and the Spacecraft 80 (SC80) is placed in a heliocentric orbit trailing the Earth by 80°.

4.1. Orbit design

Among the constraints that guided the placement of the two spacecraft we defined:

  • Scientific constraints: a constant stereoscopic view of the interplanetary space from the Sun to the Earth, off-limb measurements of the solar atmosphere, and in-situ measurements of the solar wind at 1 AU and near the Earth.

  • Engineering constraints: data transmission rates from the spacecraft, thermal control, power supply, injection orbits, and cost of the mission.

During the design phase different orbits were considered. These considerations led to the following final selected orbits (see Fig. 1).

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Sketch of the orbits of the two spacecraft in the ecliptic plane relative to the Earth and the fields of view of the optical instruments.

4.1.1. Spacecraft 80 (SC80)

The SC80 follows the same elliptical orbit as the Earth but with a smaller True Anomaly (80° less than the Earth’s), i.e. it trails the Earth during its orbit.

To put the spacecraft in orbit, two main maneuvers need to be performed. The first one, at Earth’s apogee, using a ΔV value of 1.02 km s−1 inserts the spacecraft into an elliptical orbit with an eccentricity ϵ = 0.0678. The spacecraft makes two lapses in this transfer orbit in order to build up the required tilt. This operation requires a total time of 26.7 months.

The second maneuver applies a ΔV of 1.02 km s−1 in the opposite direction again at the apogee. This second maneuver places the spacecraft in its final orbit and is provided by the spacecraft thrusters.

4.1.2. Spacecraft Earth (SCE)

The second satellite follows a Halo Lissajous orbit around L1 (see parameters in Table 2). A Soyuz launcher provides the necessary c3 energy to enter the orbit, while 10 N thrusters provide the necessary ΔV for orbit maintenance in this unstable orbit. The estimated transfer time is 3.5 months.

Table 2.

Parameters associated to the unstable Halo Lissajous orbit of SCE around the L1 point.

Using STK1 we constructed a free non-escape orbit through velocity increments along the escape direction showing that a ΔV ≈ 13.5 m s−1 is required for orbit maintenance. Comparing those values to the ones of SOHO and Herschel of 2.4 m s−1 and 1 m s−1, respectively, a nominal value of ΔV ≈ 10 m s−1 per year was assumed for orbit maintenance. For the nominal mission lifetime of 6 years this translates to a ΔV ≈ m s−1. Corrections during orbit entrance require an additional ΔV ≈ 65 m s−1, adding to a total ΔV ≈ 125 m s−1.

4.2. Spacecraft design

3D-CAD models of the two spacecraft are shown in Figures 2 and 3. The SC80 presents a more complex design required for the telemetry, tracking, and command (TT&C) and propulsion subsystems, but the remaining subsystems are very similar.

thumbnail Fig. 2.

Two views of the SCE. Some of the plasma instruments are placed in a 6 m boom behind the spacecraft, shadowed from the Sun. Optical instruments and low energy solar wind detectors point toward the Sun.

thumbnail Fig. 3.

Two views of the SC80. Optical instruments point toward the Sun. A main thruster is used to inject the satellite in the final orbit. Only one in-situ instrument is installed on board this satellite facing the Sun.

A solar wind analyzer and optical instruments on SC80 point toward the Sun with a narrow field of view. The only instrument pointing in a different direction is the HI Instrument which has a field of view of 42° with a pointing to 29° elongation. The SCE in-situ instruments are placed following the measuring constraints, which include magnetic cleanliness, orientation in the parker spiral direction, and shadowing from the Sun.

Figure 4 shows the main components of the spacecraft. The subsystems were analyzed in detail and in the following sections we present the selected characteristics for each of them. Notice in particular the difference in the sizes of the antenna and the propellant tanks, and the inclusion of a boom in the SCE.

thumbnail Fig. 4.

Block diagram of the different spacecraft subsystems.

thumbnail Fig. 5.

Planed schedule for the construction and operation of the PAC2MAN mission.

4.2.1. Propulsion

Engine design is dictated by the ΔV necessary for orbit acquisition and represents a fine balance between fuel efficiency, thrust requirements, mass, and reliable operational time. The mission requires one primary engine for the SC80 orbit injection and several secondary engines, on both spacecraft, for attitude control and orbit corrections. Several possible propulsion systems were considered, including those with a low Technology Readiness Level (TRL) like electric propulsion, but we chose to use a standard chemical bi-propellant. All engines use monomethylhydrazine (MMH) as fuel, oxidized with dinitrogen tetroxide (N2O4). Both chemicals are stored in tanks of different volume (Astrium OST 01/X for SC80 and OST 31/0 for SCE). The volume ratio between the fuel and oxidizer is 1.65. The system consists of eight pairs of Astrium S10-21 thrusters (12 + 4) for redundancy. The SCE is outfitted with four additional 10 N thrusters, while SC80 incorporates a single primary Astrium Apogee S400 – 15.

4.2.2. Attitude control system (ACS)

The attitude control system (ACS) is used to perform attitude corrections to maintain the pointing accuracy within the required limits of the optical instruments. The sensors consist of a High Accuracy Star Tracker system (HAST) composed by two Star Sensor Heads (SSH) and one Star Sensor Electronics Unit (SSEU), an Inertial Reference Unit (IRU), and two Sun Sensors (SS). The actuators consist of four Reaction Wheels (RW) and a set of 16 Hydrazine thrusters.

The ACS was designed to fulfill the requirements of the most sensitive optical instrument, the Magnetic Imager, that requires an accuracy of 0.5 arcsec and an exposure time of 4 s during science mode. These requirements can be met by combining the HAST and IRU systems, with the first one giving a 0.1 arcsec pointing accuracy before exposure and the second giving the rate errors to interpret the data with a bias drift of 0.0005 arcsec per second. This allows for a total drift of 0.1 arcsec during exposure time. The main ACS control modes are the following:

  • Coarse Sun Acquisition: used right after the injection into orbit and during orbit maintenance operations. The SS provides the attitude and the RW slew the vehicle to the Sun. In case of saturation of the wheels, thrusters are used to offoad the stored momentum.

  • Fine Sun Acquisition: the star tracker in the HAST system provides information to the RW in order to put boresight within 0.5 arcsec from the target.

  • Science Mode: star trackers provide pitch and yaw errors while the IRU provides rate errors for data handling. The RW maintains the required pointing and stores the daily momentum buildup from environmental torques.

  • Safe Mode: only the SS and the IRU provide attitude determination to maintain a low power consumption and ensuring a coarse pointing for thermal safekeeping.

The total torque applied by external perturbations was calculated to estimate the ACS fuel consumption. In the selected orbits only two perturbations are important: magnetic torque and Solar Radiation pressure torque. Assuming the presence of a magnetic field of 1 μT (WCS), a dipolar charging for the spacecraft of 1 A m−2, a reflectivity of 0.6 mm, and a displacement of 0.5 m between the center of mass and the center of radiation pressure a value of 31.7 μNm were found (with a 50% margin). Taking this torque into account and knowing the moments of inertia we estimated that in order to keep the pointing within the accuracy threshold of 0.5 arcsec the RW needs to be used for adjustments only after 10 s. With an exposure time of 4 s the accuracy is guaranteed. Considering a thruster torque of 7.5 Nm the amount of fuel necessary for corrections is 1.12 kg per year (including a 100% margin).

4.2.3. Power

The power subsystem provides, stores, and distributes the necessary power for the spacecraft bus and payload operations. Solar arrays have been dimensioned with their end of life performance at a distance of 1 AU from the Sun. The power storage system supports each spacecraft in the worst-case scenario of control loss for up to 12 h. This also includes a power distribution unit (PDU). The overall power consumption for both spacecraft has been identified as non-critical for the final design. Table 3 shows that the main power consumer for SC80 is the communications subsystem, while payload is the main power consumer for SCE. The solar panel area is 2.2 m2 for SCE and 2.7 m2 for SC80.

Table 3.

Power budget for each spacecraft.

4.2.4. Thermal

The spacecraft are maintained at a room temperature of 20 °C. Some of the remote sensing instruments have a low operating temperature and require active cooling, but these are addressed by the relevant payload design. Both satellites are assumed to have one constantly Sun-facing side. The thermal radiation and the solar reflection from the Earth are considered negligible. Heat pipes provide an effective passive heat transfer from internal heat sources and from the Sun-facing side to the radiators.

4.2.5. Telemetry, tracking, and control

A link budget was calculated for each satellite in order to design a telemetry, tracking, and control subsystem (TT&C) which fulfills the mission requirements.

Both satellites operate at a frequency of 8500 MHz (X-Band). Even though Ka-Band provides larger antenna gains, X-Band transmissions are less demanding regarding elevation, angle, or phase shift compensation of ground stations. Three 15 m X-Band ESTRACK ground stations allow for continuous communications with the spacecraft. Each of them has an approximate relative alignment of 120°. Continuous communication reduces the necessary down-link bit rate.

Reliable communications are obtained using a code rate of 1/2. Even though this doubles the necessary data rate (−3 dB) it leads to an additional coding gain of 6 dB. BPSK modulation is used in order to minimize the bit energy to noise ratio demand to the least possible value (9.6 dB for a maximum bit error rate of 10−5).

Both satellites use high gain, narrow beam, parabolic antennas for scientific and operational data. In addition, low gain omnidirectional antennas are used in case of a failure of the main antenna. The noise at the receiving antenna at the X-Band frequency causes an additional link degradation of 15.2 dB.

The link-margin, generally required to be above 3 dB, was calculated for both satellites and is shown in Table 4.

Table 4.

Link budget calculations used for communications analysis.

4.2.6. On-Board Data Handling

The On-Board Data Handling subsystem (OBDH) consists of dedicated control units for each module. A Satellite Control Unit (SCU) handles the housekeeping, such as regular temperature and pressure measurements, as well as Failure Detection, Isolation and Recovery (FDIR) based on the derived information from other sub-control units. The SCU interprets and executes commands which are forwarded by the communication-control subsystem and handles the data before it is sent to Earth. The data is recorded on a solid-state mass memory which can store up to 70 GB.

Two separate modules for the Service (SVM) and the Payload (PLM) report back to the SCU. The PLM consists of a payload controller, a data processing unit and thermal controlling subsystem. The SVM consists of an attitude and orbit controller, a propulsion controlling unit, a communication controller as well as a controlling unit for the thermal system. A dedicated power control unit is used to manage the power source, the power storage and the power distribution. The control units belonging to the PLM are attached to a high speed SpaceWire network while the controllers of the service module use a CAN-Bus to communicate within the satellite.

4.3. Mass budget

The mass of each one of the subsystems is based on available information of past missions, published catalogs, and personal experience from expert consultants. The mass budget was calculated for each individual subsystem considering safety margins as shown in Table 5.

Table 5.

Mass budget of each spacecraft. Values are given in kg.

4.4. Launchers

The mission is designed for an operational lifetime of 6 years covering a period of maximum solar activity. The satellites will reach their final orbit 3 years before the predicted maximum of solar cycle 26. Delays of the launch date could lead to operations during solar minimum below optimal operation conditions. Operations in such case will still allow measurement of up to 0.5 CMEs/day (see Gopalswamy et al., 2003).

Two Soyuz rockets taking off from Kourou, French Guiana, are used to launch the spacecraft to the required transfer orbits. The first launcher injects SC80 into an elliptic transfer orbit through an Earth escape orbit with c3 = 1.15 km2 s−2. The second launcher injects SCE into its Lissajous orbit through an Earth escape orbit with c3 = 0.08 km2 s−2.

4.5. Cost estimation

Because we propose using two spacecraft, the Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) budget for the full mission is similar to an ESA L-class mission. Many features in the design can drive down the total cost of the mission, including a possible platform heritage from Planck/Herschel, architectural similarities between the spacecraft, size of the satellites, and a possible shared launch for the SCE. Descoping options were also evaluated, but using current technology descoping is not recommended. A 6-year mission extension with a more operational Space Weather focus will add an extra 100 M€ to the cost (Table 6).

Table 6.

The ROM cost estimation for the full PAC2MAN mission.

4.6. Risk assessment

Several scenarios representing different risks for the mission were evaluated and graded based on their likelihood (from low A, to high E) and their impact (from low 1, to high 5). A1 represent the lowest risk and E5 the highest. The most important risks are:

  • Unavailability of scientific instruments close to launch time (B3). The IR and UV coronagraph (UVIRC) and the Multi-Magnetic Imager (MMI) have a TRL of 3. To mitigate this risk we planned for a close monitoring of the instrument developments and additional options in case of mission delay.

  • Degradation of instruments due to constant solar exposure (B3). Especially a degradation of the polarimeter’s filters. We propose to include in the final design a mechanism to switch spare filters in the filter wheels.

  • Loss of SC80 spacecraft (A4). Although a critical risk, the SCE alone carries observational and in-situ instruments more capable than those on the ACE spacecraft.

  • Loss of attitude control (C1). A customized Safe Mode and redundant sensors and actuators are implemented in both systems. One common issue associated to loss of attitude control is the inability to correctly point the solar panels, reducing the available power and forcing the use of batteries designed to last 12 h. To ensure attitude control a computationally demanding algorithm must be activated using CPU time available when the non-vital systems are turned off.

  • Loss of SCE spacecraft (A3). In this scenario we will use already existing satellites at L1 to cover some measurements of SCE. SC80 provides Space Weather forecasting by measuring CMEs from Sun to Earth from that viewpoint.

5. Payload

5.1. Ultraviolet and Infrared Coronagraph (UVIRC) for spectropolarimetry in coronal lines

To calculate the three components of the magnetic field at different altitudes, for a large range of magnetic strengths, we need spectropolarimetric measurements in several lines. Our two satellites are equipped with two identical coronagraphs for spectropolarimetric measurements in infrared and ultraviolet spectral lines, as well as visible light. We detail here the choice of the lines observed to ensure a good measurement of magnetic fields in the corona, and then the design of the specialized instrument.

5.1.1. Choice of spectral lines

The hydrogen Lyman α and β are among the brightest coronal lines in the far ultraviolet spectrum. They have suitable sensitivity to determine the coronal magnetic field using the Hanle effect (see Raouafi et al. 2009). The Lα radiation comes mainly from the fluorescent scattering from the intense chromospheric underlying source (see Gabriel 1971; Bommier & Sahal-Brechot 1982), and the domain of sensitivity of this line to the Hanle effect lies in the range 12–600 Gauss. Lyman β has an important contribution from the electron collision (see Raouafi et al. 2009). It is sensitive to weaker field (maximum sensitivity around 15 G). Bommier & Sahal-Brechot (1982) suggested that a complete reconstruction of the three components of the magnetic field can be obtained using a combination of two observations: the first one is the interpretation of the Hanle effect in the Lα line, the second one is the determination of the direction of the magnetic field from the linear polarization of a forbidden line formed in the same region.

Our spectropolarimeter measures the full Stokes parameters in the two UV lines Lyman α and Lyman β, but also in three forbidden emission lines in the infrared. The infrared lines are FeXIII 1074.7 nm, FeXIII 1079.8 nm, and HeI 1083.0 nm. The two iron lines are forbidden coronal emission lines with a high potential to determine the direction of the coronal field (see Judge et al. 2001). The helium line is a forbidden chromospheric line, and provides an additional and complementary measure to the chromospheric magnetic field imager using the Zeeman effect in the sodium doublet (instrument MMI).

5.1.2. Instrument design

The design of the Ultraviolet and Infrared Coronagraph was inspired by the Visible light and IR Coronagraph (VIRCOR) proposed for the SolmeX mission (see Peter et al. 2012) and the MAGnetic Imaging Coronagraph (MAGIC) using a LYOT + concept (see Millard et al. 2004). The sketch illustrating the principles of the instrument is presented in Figure 6. The image does not contain all components of the instrument (e.g. internal baffles needed for straight light reduction are not shown for clarity). The low corona, between 1.1 R S and 2.0 R S , is observed with an internally occulted coronagraph with an aperture of 20 cm. The same aperture is used for infrared, visible and ultraviolet light, as it has already been proved to be possible in the Spectral Irradiance Monitor (SIM) instrument on the SORCE satellite (see Harder et al. 2005). The ultraviolet light is separated from the visible/infrared with a two-side-mirror, the two faces having different coatings.

thumbnail Fig. 6.

Sketch of the spectropolarimeter. Only optical elements are needed for the understanding of the principle of the measurement (e.g. internal baffles are not shown).

The pointing accuracy is constrained by the occultation (1/15 of 1.1 R S ): therefore the instrument requires a pointing accuracy of 72 arcsec. The stability of 3 arcsec has to be kept during the longer exposure time of 20 s. The infrared lines FeXIII 1074.7 nm, FeXIII 1079.8 nm, and HeI 1083.0 nm are analyzed using a Liquid Crystal Variable Retarder device for both the polarimetry and the tunable wavelength selection, and a narrow-band tunable filter.

A six-stage birefringent filter is used to select different wavelengths. It needs to be maintained at a temperature of 30 °C, with a variation of less than 5 mC in 24 h. The detector is a Teledyne imaging HgCdTe 2048 × 2048 detector with pixel size of 15 μm. Observation of the K-corona is possible by diverting the light through a beam-splitter, followed by a tunable broad-band filter and a dichroic linear polarizer. The filtered photons are captured by an APS sensor 2048 × 2048 with pixel size of 15 μm. The UV HI Lyman α line at 121.6 nm is isolated with a high reflectivity Brewster’s angle linear polarizer. An APS sensor 2048 × 2048 with pixel size of 15 μm is used to capture the filtered light.

The major issue in coronagraphic observations is the reduction of straight light. This becomes difficult when observing in the ultraviolet range, which is significantly fainter than optical and nearinfrared light. Internal baffles as well as photon traps are used to ensure the straight light reduction. The UV detectors require a special care throughout the mission. It is especially important to ensure the cleanliness of this instrument during the entire mission. The filters are replaced during the mission by a filter wheel mounted at the entrance of the instrument.

5.2. Multi-channel Magnetic Imager (MMI)

Measurements of the vector magnetic field (Stokes Vector) of the photosphere and the chromosphere are performed by imaging different spectral lines in the visible spectrum. To measure the fields in the photosphere we use the iron lines at 630.15 nm and 603.25 nm. For the chromosphere the sodium lines D1 (589.592 nm) and D2 (588.995 nm) are used. For each one of the four lines, Full-Disk images are recorded by a Multi-channel Magnetic Imager (MMI).

Figure 7 shows the design of the new instrument. It is roughly based on existing imagers such as HMI (SDO) and ASPIICS (Proba 3). The refracting telescope with a diameter of 14 cm ensures the required spatial resolution. The two lines are measured in parallel. The selection of iron and sodium lines and the protection against overheating due to sunlight are done by external filters (FWHM 5 nm) in a filter wheel. The different lines are selected using tunable liquid crystal Lyot filters which have to be heated to 300 ± 0.1 K.

thumbnail Fig. 7.

Design of the new Multi-Magnetic Imager (MMI) instrument.

Two CCD cameras (4096 × 4096 pixel) with a resolution of 0.5 arcsec/pixel allow the ability to distinguish between different important zones within an active region. These are passively cooled to 233 K and take a series of 24 pictures for two spectral lines simultaneously within 2 min, before the filter wheel switches to the alternative lines. Each of these series is then preprocessed on board to obtain images of continuum intensity, line of sight velocity, and magnetic field components. A complete set of observations is obtained every 4 min.

5.3. Photospheric Magnetic Imager (MI)

The mission can monitor active regions in the Sun for 2 weeks before they are aligned with the Earth. The Stokes vector of the photosphere is measured using the FeI line at 617.3 nm. This type of observation has been already performed in previous missions. The MI is inspired by the HMI on SDO. A set of 24 images every hour allows to monitoring of the magnetic field components, line of sight velocity, and continuum intensity of the photosphere. Details of the instrument characteristics are given in Table 7.

Table 7.

Overview of the operational characteristics of the remote-sensing instruments.

5.4. Extreme Ultraviolet Imager (EUVI)

Compared to other parts of the solar atmosphere the corona emits light in fewer spectral lines. Current observations (STEREO, SDO, PROBA2) concentrate mainly on the FeIX/X line in Extreme UV (EUV). In particular, coronal loops, which are indicators of closed magnetic field lines, are visible in this line.

In order to investigate the onset of flares and CMEs images of the whole solar disk in this EUV line are essential. Measurements of the intensity in this line are achieved with imaging devices that use a narrow-band filter. We use the SWAP EUV imager (see Seaton et al. 2013) from the PROBA2 mission (see Santandrea et al. 2013) which takes images at 17.4 nm. Due to its novel and compact Ritchey-Chrétien scheme with an aperture of 33 mm it can be built in a compact form. It uses a new CCD technology and has a low power consumption of 5 W. The time cadence can be controlled and is currently set between 110 s and 120 s in the PROBA2 mission.

The field of view (FOV) ranges up to 1.6 R S measured from the disk center. We do not need to make additional adaptations of the SWAP instrument for our mission because it exactly fulfills the requirements. This allows observation of coronal dynamics on short time scales, e.g. at the onset of a CME.

5.5. White-light coronagraph

White-light coronagraphs on SCE and SC80 are essential for this mission. They provide a view on the solar corona by blocking the much brighter light of the photosphere. This is achieved by an occulter disk.

The most important criterion for the quality of a coronagraph is its ability to suppress stray light from the lower solar atmosphere. Due to the sharp decrease in intensity of the outer corona the white-light coronagraph has to cover an intensity range of several orders of magnitude.

We decided to use the heritage of the LASCO C3 coronagraph of the SOHO mission (see Brueckner et al. 1995) in order to gain a FOV of 2 RS to 30 RS and cover a brightness range from 10−8 to 10−11 of the Mean Solar Brightness (MSB). The Cor2 Coronagraph of STEREO uses the same technology but has a smaller FOV. The LASCO C3 has now been in space for 18 years and still produces high-quality images of the outer corona and interplanetary space. The external occulter guarantees a low stray light contamination.

Due to the low density and brightness, higher exposure times are needed in comparison with other PAC2MAN mission imagers. The exposure time of LASCO C3 (about 19 s) and its time cadence (24 min) is enough to fulfill the requirements of the PAC2MAN mission. With the White Light Coronagraph we are able to observe the outer corona and the beginning of CME propagation, including their speed and their direction of propagation.

Limitations in the telemetry from SC80 will require the development of on-board processing algorithms that detect, analyze, and transmit only the sections of the image that contain the Earth directed CMEs. Such improvements should be part of subsequent mission design phases.

5.6. Heliospheric Imager

This instrument is present only in the SC80. Its design is based in the two Heliospheric Imagers installed on the STEREO spacecraft. The HI is designed for a stray light suppression of 10−14 B0 (B0 = solar disk intensity) and a wide angle field of view. For this mission the HI-1 imaging system is removed completely and the HI-2 field of view is reduced to 42° with a pointing to 29° elongation. The other main characteristics of the HI are listed in Table 7. Operational constraints of all remote-sensing instruments are presented in Table 8.

Table 8.

Constraints of the remote-sensing instruments.

5.7. In-Situ instruments

Instruments are placed on the SCE spacecraft to measure the interplanetary plasma conditions near the Earth. The prediction of solar wind conditions and IMF orientation will help to define a set of improved input parameters for magnetospheric and ionospheric models. Due to telemetry constraints on the SC80 only one in-situ instrument, measuring the low energy solar wind, is included.

For these measurements we have three main instruments: The Low Energy Solar Wind Sensors (LEWiS), the High Energy Particle Sensors (HEPS), and the Fluxgate Magnetometer (MAG). These instruments are directly inherited from the Solar Orbiter particles package (see Müller et al. 2013). They cover a large array of energies, detect different types of particles, are lightweight, and have a low power consumption.

Solar wind and high energy plasma characteristics can be accurately correlated with observations made by the optical instruments. Numerical models based on both measurements will improve our understanding of the effects of solar events on the near-Earth environment.

5.7.1. Low Energy Solar Wind Sensors (LEWiS).

The first pack of instruments, LEWiS, measures solar wind bulk properties leading to the detection of CMEs and interplanetary shocks. Solar wind properties (velocity, density, temperature, magnetic field) fluctuate constantly causing geomagnetic storms of different intensities on the Earth. The pack includes the following three instruments:

  • The Electron Analyzer System

    • The Electron Analyzer System (EAS) measures the velocity distribution function of electrons. Electrons arrive to the instrument from any direction due to their large thermal spread. To provide a full 4π sr field of view, the two sensors used have a ±45° aperture deflection and are mounted orthogonal to each other in the shadow of the spacecraft at the end of an instrument boom. Each of the orthogonal sensors consists of a pair of top-hat electrostatic analyzers with aperture deflection plates.

  • The Proton-Alpha Sensor

    • The Proton-Alpha Sensor (PAS) measures the 3D velocity distribution function of the dominant solar wind species (protons and α-particles). It consists of an electrostatic analyzer with an ion steering (IS) system at the aperture. It has an angular resolution ≤2° across a field of view of −17.5° to +47.5° by ±22.5° about the solar direction.

    • This sensor is the only in-situ instrument installed in both spacecraft.

  • The Heavy Ion Sensor

    • The Heavy Ion Sensor (HIS) analyzes the minor ion components of the solar wind, like major charge states of oxygen and iron, and 3D velocity distribution of some weakly ionized species (C+, N+, Mg+, Si+, Ne+, He+ etc). HIS measures five key properties: mass (range: 2–56 amu/q), charge, energy (0.5–100 keV/q for azimuth and 0.5–16 keV/q for elevation), and direction of incidence (θ, φ).

    • To measure these properties the LEWiS/HIS is made up of four contiguous parts: the solar faced entrance aperture and ion steering (IS) directs incoming ions from different elevations/azimuths toward the electrostatic module, followed by a time-of-flight (TOF) telescope and solid-state detectors (SSD).

    • In total it measures different energy ranges from a few eV to ~5 keV for electrons and ~0.2–100 keV/q for heavy ions and protons (Table 9). It has a total mass of ~15.9 kg. The LEWiS is inspired by similar instruments on board Solar Orbiter (see Müller et al. 2013), STEREO (see Kaiser et al. 2008), Ulysses (see Wenzel et al. 1992), and ACE (see Bernath et al. 2005).

      Table 9.

      Energy range in keV or keV/nuc for the sensors of the Low Energy Solar Wind Analyzer (LEWiS) for different energetic Particles.

5.7.2. High Energy Particle Sensor

The High Energy Particle Sensor (HEPS) measures high energy particles caused by solar energetic events (see Miralles & Almeida 2011). It measures the full composition of the energetic particles, velocity dispersion, and proton/electron intensities in various energy ranges from a few keV up to 200 MeV (see Table 10) (see Müller et al. 2013). It combines five separate sensors which share a common data processing unit. The different sensors have different FOV and are described next:

  • Supra-Thermal Electrons, Ions and Neutrals

    • The first sensor of HEPS, the Supra-Thermal Electrons, Ions and Neutrals Telescope (STEIN), is a double-ended telescope. It uses a passively cooled silicon semiconductor detector (SSD) to measure supra-thermal particles with an energy range from 3 to 100 keV. To separate ions and electrons STEIN uses an electrostatic deflection system. The ions are stopped by the system up to an energy of 40 keV and neutrals up to 10 keV. The STEIN telescope has to be mounted on a boom and covers a field-of-view of 70° × 60°. The sensor is pointing into the direction of the Parker spiral.

  • Supra-thermal Ion Spectrograph

    • The SIS detects heavy ions with an energy range of 8 keV/nuc–10 MeV/nuc, as well as ultra heavy ions in 3He-rich solar flares below 1 MeV/nuc. It uses time-of-flight mass spectrometry (see Müller et al. 2013). The two telescopes with a FOV of 22° are pointing in the sun-ward and anti-sun-ward direction, detecting the particles when they pass through the entrance foil. The SSD detectors have a large detection area of ≈12 cm2.

  • High-Energy Telescope

    • The High-Energy Telescope (HET) detects high-energy particles with energy ranges of 10–100 MeV for protons, 20–200 MeV/nuc for heavier ions, and 300 keV–20 MeV for electrons. It deals with the energy ranges of larger solar events and allows a separation of 3He/4He isotope ratio of about 1%. The sensor uses a combination of solid-state detectors and a scintillator calorimeter. This allows us to use the dE/dx vs. total E technique for particle identification and energy measurements (see Müller et al. 2013). Two double-ended sensors are used, one pointing sun-ward and the other anti-sun-ward. The HET has a FOV of 50°.

  • Low-Energy Telescope

    • The Low-Energy Telescope (LET) measures heavy ions from H to Ni with an energy range of 1.5–60 MeV/nuc. With the LET it is possible to resolve 3He and multiple heavy ion species (Ne and Mg) in order to identify particle sources. The instrument uses six small stacks of silicon detectors. To get 3D information the sensor has three telescopes with an angular separation of 60°. The LET closes the energy gap between SIS and HET for heavy ion measurements.

  • Electron Proton Telescope

    • The Electron Proton Telescope (EPT) measures electrons (energy range: 20–700 keV), protons (energy range: 20 keV–9 MeV), and their anisotropies with the magnet/foil-technique (see Müller et al. 2013). One of the two double-ended telescopes points along the Parker spiral and the other points 45° out of the ecliptic. The instrument closes the energy gap of electrons between STEIN and HET and the energy gap between STEIN and LET for proton energy ranges.

Table 10.

Energy range in MeV or MeV/nuc for the sensors of the High Energy Particle Sensor (HEPS) for different energetic particles (see Müller et al. 2013).

In total HEPS measures different energy ranges from few keV to 200 MeV for heavy ions, protons, and electrons. It has a total mass of 16.1 kg and an operation temperature of 233–333 K. The HEPS is inspired by Solar Orbiter (see Müller et al. 2013), STEREO (see Kaiser et al. 2008), SOHO (see Domingo et al. 1995), and ACE (see Bernath et al. 2005).

5.7.3. Magnetometer

The Magnetometer (MAG) measures the heliospheric magnetic field at the L1 point with a measuring range of ±500 nT. Using a dual fluxgate sensor the instrument reaches high precision of ≈4 pT (see Müller et al. 2013). Two detectors are used: one in the vicinity of the spacecraft and the second far away mounted in a boom. Interference from the spacecraft is extracted from the heliospheric magnetic field using an advanced dual sensor technique: it has been observed that beyond a certain distance, the induced magnetic field of the spacecraft can be assumed dipolar. This field can be separated from the background field by placing magnetometers at two different radial locations aligned with the center of the dipole (see Ness et al. 1971; Acuna 2002). Both detectors are mounted on the instrument boom in the shadow of the spacecraft. MAG has high time-resolution of 100 vectors/s.

6. Conclusions

The space mission presented in this paper is the result of the work performed by 15 young scientists and engineers in the framework of the ESA Alpbach Summer School 2013. All the technical and scientific solutions were developed in a time frame of 10 days.

There is currently a need for more precise measurements of the energetic content of active regions of the Sun. We propose in Section 3.2 that a continuous surveillance of the vector magnetic field at different altitudes in the solar atmosphere can be used to improve the modeling of the free magnetic energy that triggers CMEs and flares.

The objective of the mission is to identify several days in advance when eruptive events will take place on the Sun and then forecast their Earth-arrival once they erupt. Full coverage of the space weather event can be obtained by additional in-situ measurements of the plasma characteristics of the solar wind near the Earth.

To attain the objectives presented in Section 2, we place two spacecraft in different orbits: Spacecraft Earth (SCE) is located in an orbit around the Lagrangian L1 point, and Spacecraft 80 (SC80) is located in a heliosynchronous orbit at 1 AU trailing the Earth by 80°. Measurements of the vector magnetic field at different altitudes (photosphere, chromosphere and corona) are performed by a series of optical instruments. Two of the instruments were designed from scratch and are presented in Sections 5.1 and 5.2. The choice of spectral lines presented in Section 5.1.1 allows the detection of magnetic field components by interpreting the Hanle effect, never used before in a spaceborne instrument. The spectroscopic view obtained from the two spacecraft allows the instrument to perform accurate combined observations of the three-dimensional magnetic structures in the solar disk and in the off-limb region.

Plasma instruments mounted in the SCE measure the properties of the solar wind ahead of the Earth. Correlations between observations in the Sun and plasma characteristics will allow building new models for the forecasting of geoeffectiveness of space weather events. Section 5.7 shows details on the types of instruments used to detect electrons, protons, and heavy ions at different energy ranges. Fluxgate magnetometers measure the three components of the interplanetary magnetic field.

The mission profile and details about the engineering solutions proposed are presented in Section 4. We paid special attention in designing the spacecraft to include accurate constraints in terms of mass, control methods, communications, power supply, thermal balance, and cost.

For a total estimated cost of 1180 M€ we have designed a space weather mission that will track continuously, for 6 years, the evolution of eruptive events that affect human life and technology. CMEs and flares will be followed from days before their formation on the Sun to their effects in the Earth environment. This mission is a significant step forward for the forecasting of eruptive solar events and their geoeffectiveness.


The publication of the work presented in this paper received funding from the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under the grant agreement eHeroes (project 284461,

The main work for this project was performed during the ESA Summer School Alpbach 2013. We would like to thank the organizers of the summer school, the European Space Agency (ESA), the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG), the International Space Science Institute (ISSI), the Association of Austrian Space Industries (AUSTROSPACE), and the Summer School director Michaela Gitsch.

Each participant would like to acknowledge the financial support for the participation in the Alpbach Summer School 2013 to the following institutions: CNES, the LABEX ESP, and ANR for their support through the “investissement d’avenir” program (Sophie Musset), DLR (René Kiefer), the Swedish National Space Board (Viktor Andersson), and the Swiss Committee on Space Research, Swiss Academy of Sciences (Mohammad Madi).

We wish to thank our summer school tutors, Marcus Hallmann and Manuela Temmer, for their excellent supervision and support. In addition we would like to thank Peter Falkner, Margit Haberreiter, Andre Balogh, Christian Erd, Juha-Pekka Luntama, Anik de Groof, Volker Bothmer, Denis Moura, Günther Reitz, Roger Bonnet, and all the tutors for the help they provided during the summer school, their feedback, and good ideas. The editor thanks Bernard Jackson and an anonymous referee for their assistance in evaluating this paper.


Systems Tool Kit (STK) is a software package commonly used for the calculation of complex orbital dynamics.


  • Acuna, M.H. Space-based magnetometers. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 73 (11), 3717–3736, 2002, [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alissandrakis, C.A., and F. Chiuderi Drago. Coronal magnetic fields from Faraday rotation observations. Sol. Phys., 160, 171–179, 1995. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Amari, T., J.J. Aly, J.F. Luciani, T.Z. Boulmezaoud, and Z. Mikic. Reconstructing the solar coronal magnetic field as a force-free magnetic field. Sol. Phys., 174, 129–149, 1997. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Aulanier, G., P. Démoulin, C.J. Schrijver, M. Janvier, E. Pariat, and B. Schmieder. The standard flare model in three dimensions. II. Upper limit on solar flare energy. A&A, 549, A66, 2013. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Bernath, P.F., C.T. McElroy, M.C. Abrams, C.D. Boone, M. Butler, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE): mission overview. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L15S01, 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bommier, V., and S. Sahal-Brechot. The Hanle effect of the coronal L-alpha line of hydrogen – theoretical investigation. Sol. Phys., 78, 157–178, 1982. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brueckner, G.E., R.A. Howard, M.J. Koomen, C.M. Korendyke, D.J. Michels, et al. The Large Angle Spectroscopic Coronagraph (LASCO). Sol. Phys., 162, 357–402, 1995. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cane, H.V., and I.G. Richardson. Interplanetary coronal mass ejections in the near-Earth solar wind during 1996–2002. J. Geophys. Res. [Space Phys.], 108 (A4), 2003, ISSN 2156-2202. DOI: 10.1029/2002JA009817. [Google Scholar]
  • Cheung, M.C.M., and M.L. DeRosa. A method for data-driven simulations of evolving solar active regions. Astrophys. J., 757, 147, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • Chevalier, R.A., and D.L. Lambert. The excitation of the forbidden coronal lines. I: Fe XIII λλ 10747, 10798 and 3388. Sol. Phys., 10, 115–134, 1969. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cliver, E.W., and W.F. Dietrich. The 1859 space weather event revisited: limits of extreme activity. J. Space Weather Space Clim., 3 (26), A31, 2013. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Curto, J.J., and L.R. Gaya-Piqué. Geoeffectiveness of solar flares in magnetic crochet (sfe) production: I – Dependence on their spectral nature and position on the solar disk. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 71, 1695–1704, 2009, ISSN 1364-6826. [Google Scholar]
  • Demoulin, P., J.C. Henoux, C.H. Mandrini, and E.R. Priest. Can we extrapolate a magnetic field when its topology is complex? Sol. Phys., 174, 73–89, 1997. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Domingo, V., B. Fleck, and A.I. Poland. The SOHO Mission: an overview. Sol. Phys., 162, 1–37, 1995. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Emslie, A.G., H. Kucharek, B.R. Dennis, N. Gopalswamy, G.D. Holman, et al. Energy partition in two solar flare/CME events. J. Geophys. Res. [Space Phys.], 109, A10104, 2004. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Feynman, J., and S.B. Gabriel. On space weather consequences and predictions. J. Geophys. Res. [Space Phys.], 105 (A5), 10543–10564, 2000, ISSN 2156-2202. DOI: 10.1029/1999JA000141. [Google Scholar]
  • Feynman, J., and S.F. Martin. The initiation of coronal mass ejections by newly emerging magnetic flux. J. Geophys. Res. [Space Phys.], 100 (A3), 3355–3367, 1995, ISSN 2156-2202. DOI: 10.1029/94JA02591. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Flower, D.R., and G. Pineau des Forets. Excitation of the Fe XIII spectrum in the solar corona. A&A, 24, 181, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  • Gabriel, A.H. Measurements on the Lyman Alpha Corona (Papers presented at the Proceedings of the International Symposium on the 1970 Solar Eclipse, held in Seattle, U.S.A., 18–21 June, 1971.). Sol. Phys., 21, 392–400, 1971. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gary, D.E., and G.J. Hurford. Coronal temperature, density, and magnetic field maps of a solar active region using the Owens Valley Solar Array. Astrophys. J., 420, 903–912, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • Gopalswamy, N., A. Lara, S. Yashiro, S. Nunes, and R.A. Howard. Coronal mass ejection activity during solar cycle 23. In: A. Wilson, Editor. Solar Variability as an Input to the Earth’s Environment, volume 535 of ESA Special Publication, 403–414, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • Gopalswamy, N., S. Yashiro, and S. Akiyama. Geoeffectiveness of halo coronal mass ejections. J. Geophys. Res. [Space Phys.], 112, 2007, ISSN 2156-2202. DOI: 10.1029/2006JA012149. [Google Scholar]
  • Harder, J., G. Lawrence, J. Fontenla, G. Rottman, and T. Woods. The spectral irradiance monitor: scientific requirements, instrument design, and operation modes. Sol. Phys., 230, 141–167, 2005. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Judge, P.G., R. Casini, S. Tomczyk, D.P. Edwards, and E. Francis. Coronal magnetometry: a feasibility study. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N, 2, 27999, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • Kaiser, M.L., T.A. Kucera, J.M. Davila, O.C. St. Cyr, M. Guhathakurta, and E. Christian. The STEREO Mission: an introduction. Space Sci. Rev., 136, 5–16, 2008. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kretzschmar, M. The Sun as a star: observations of white-light flares. A&A, 530, A84, 2011. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Lin, H., J.R. Kuhn, and R. Coulter. Coronal magnetic field measurements. Astrophys. J., 613, L177–L180, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • Luhmann, J.G., J.T. Gosling, J.T. Hoeksema, and X. Zhao. The relationship between large-scale solar magnetic field evolution and coronal mass ejections. J. Geophys. Res. [Space Phys.], 103 (A4), 6585–6593, 1998, ISSN 2156-2202. DOI: 10.1029/97JA03727. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mancuso, S., and S.R. Spangler. Coronal Faraday rotation observations: measurements and limits on plasma inhomogeneities. Astrophys. J., 525 (1), 195, 1999, [Google Scholar]
  • McClymont, A.N., L. Jiao, and Z. Mikic. Problems and progress in computing three-dimensional coronal active region magnetic fields from boundary data. Sol. Phys., 174, 191–218, 1997. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Millard, A., P. Lemaire, and J.C. Vial. EUV imager and spectrometer for Lyot and Solar Orbiter space missions. In: B. Warmbein, Editor. 5th International Conference on Space Optics, volume 554 of ESA Special Publication, 351–354, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • Miralles, M., and J. Almeida. The Sun, the Solar Wind, and the Heliosphere, Springer, IAGA Special Sopron Book Series, ISBN: 9789048197873, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Müller, D., R.G. Marsden, O.C. St. Cyr, and H.R. Gilbert. Solar orbiter. Sol. Phys., 285 (1–2), 25–70, 2013, ISSN 0038-0938. DOI: 10.1007/s11207-012-0085-7. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mustajab, F., and Badruddin. Relative geo-effectiveness of coronal mass ejections with distinct features in interplanetary space. Planet. Space Sci., 82–83, 43–61, 2013, ISSN 0032-0633. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ness, N.F., K.W. Behannon, R.P. Lepping, and K.H. Schatten. Use of two magnetometers for magnetic field measurements on a spacecraft. J. Geophys. Res., 76 (16), 3564–3573, 1971, ISSN 2156-2202. DOI: 10.1029/JA076i016p03564. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Owens, M.J., and N.U. Crooker. Coronal mass ejections and magnetic flux buildup in the heliosphere. J. Geophys. Res. [Space Phys.], 111 (A10), 2006, ISSN 2156-2202. DOI: 10.1029/2006JA011641. [Google Scholar]
  • Patzold, M., M.K. Bird, H. Volland, G.S. Levy, B.L. Seidel, and C.T. Stelzried. The mean coronal magnetic field determined from HELIOS Faraday rotation measurements. Sol. Phys., 109, 91–105, 1987. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peter, H., L. Abbo, V. Andretta, F. Auchère, A. Bemporad, et al. Solar magnetism eXplorer (SolmeX). Exploring the magnetic field in the upper atmosphere of our closest star. Exp. Astron., 33, 271–303, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • Raouafi, N.E., S.K. Solanki, and T. Wiegelmann. Hanle effect diagnostics of the coronal magnetic field: a test using realistic magnetic field configurations. In: S.V., Berdyugina, K.N. Nagendra, and R. Ramelli, Editors. Solar Polarization 5: In Honor of Jan Stenflo, volume 405 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 429, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • Reinard, A.A., J. Henthorn, R. Komm, and F. Hill. Evidence that temporal changes in solar subsurface helicity precede active region flaring. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 710 (2), L121, 2010, [Google Scholar]
  • Sahal-Brechot, S. The Hanle effect applied to magnetic field diagnostics. Space Sci. Rev., 29, 391–401, 1981. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Santandrea, S., K. Gantois, K. Strauch, F. Teston, E. Tilmans, C. Baijot, D. Gerrits, A. De Groof, G. Schwehm, and J. Zender. PROBA2: mission and spacecraft overview. Sol. Phys., 286, 5–19, 2013. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scherrer, P.H., J. Schou, R.I. Bush, A.G. Kosovichev, R.S. Bogart, et al. The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) Investigation for the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Sol. Phys., 275, 207–227, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • Schrijver, C.J., J. Beer, U. Baltensperger, E.W. Cliver, M. Güdel, et al. Estimating the frequency of extremely energetic solar events, based on solar, stellar, lunar, and terrestrial records. J. Geophys. Res. [Space Phys.], 117, A08103, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • Seaton, D.B., D. Berghmans, B. Nicula, J.-P. Halain, A. De Groof, et al. The SWAP EUV imaging telescope part I: instrument overview and pre-flight testing. Sol. Phys., 286, 43–65, 2013. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sun, X., J.T. Hoeksema, Y. Liu, T. Wiegelmann, K. Hayashi, Q. Chen, and J. Thalmann. Evolution of magnetic field and energy in a major eruptive active region based on SDO/HMI observation. Astrophys. J., 748, 77, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • Tomczyk, S., G.L. Card, T. Darnell, D.F. Elmore, R. Lull, P.G. Nelson, K.V. Streander, J. Burkepile, R. Casini, and P.G. Judge. An instrument to measure coronal emission line polarization. Sol. Phys., 247, 411–428, 2008. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wenzel, K.P., R.G. Marsden, D.E. Page, and E.J. Smith. The ULYSSES mission. A&AS, 92, 207, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • Woods, T.N., G. Kopp, and P.C. Chamberlin. Contributions of the solar ultraviolet irradiance to the total solar irradiance during large flares. J. Geophys. Res. [Space Phys.], 111, A10S14, 2006. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Amaya J., S. Musset, V. Andersson, A. Diercke, C. Höller, et al. The PAC2MAN mission: a new tool to understand and predict solar energetic events. J. Space Weather Space Clim., 5, A5, 2015, DOI: 10.1051/swsc/2015005.

All Tables

Table 1.

The two main instruments currently providing magnetograms in the photosphere.

Table 2.

Parameters associated to the unstable Halo Lissajous orbit of SCE around the L1 point.

Table 3.

Power budget for each spacecraft.

Table 4.

Link budget calculations used for communications analysis.

Table 5.

Mass budget of each spacecraft. Values are given in kg.

Table 6.

The ROM cost estimation for the full PAC2MAN mission.

Table 7.

Overview of the operational characteristics of the remote-sensing instruments.

Table 8.

Constraints of the remote-sensing instruments.

Table 9.

Energy range in keV or keV/nuc for the sensors of the Low Energy Solar Wind Analyzer (LEWiS) for different energetic Particles.

Table 10.

Energy range in MeV or MeV/nuc for the sensors of the High Energy Particle Sensor (HEPS) for different energetic particles (see Müller et al. 2013).

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Sketch of the orbits of the two spacecraft in the ecliptic plane relative to the Earth and the fields of view of the optical instruments.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2.

Two views of the SCE. Some of the plasma instruments are placed in a 6 m boom behind the spacecraft, shadowed from the Sun. Optical instruments and low energy solar wind detectors point toward the Sun.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3.

Two views of the SC80. Optical instruments point toward the Sun. A main thruster is used to inject the satellite in the final orbit. Only one in-situ instrument is installed on board this satellite facing the Sun.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4.

Block diagram of the different spacecraft subsystems.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5.

Planed schedule for the construction and operation of the PAC2MAN mission.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6.

Sketch of the spectropolarimeter. Only optical elements are needed for the understanding of the principle of the measurement (e.g. internal baffles are not shown).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7.

Design of the new Multi-Magnetic Imager (MMI) instrument.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.